AI Overview

AI Overview...

#ChiefJustice, #HighCourtJudge, #LandmarkJudgments

Unraveling the Mystery: Judge Born in Which Year Worked in Hometown High Court 1987-1991, Became Chief Justice


The search query Judge who was Born in which Year Worked in High Court of his Hometown 1987 to 1991 and Became Chief Justice poses an intriguing puzzle rooted in Indian judicial history. While the provided search results focus on landmark Supreme Court judgments rather than explicit biographies, they offer contextual clues from cases argued or decided during the late 1980s and early 1990s. This post analyzes these materials to explore possible matches, highlighting key cases and judicial timelines. Note: This is general information based on public records; individual legal advice requires professional consultation.


Understanding the Query and Judicial Context


Indian High Courts saw numerous judges elevated to the Supreme Court and eventually Chief Justices during the 1980s-1990s. The period 1987-1991 aligns with significant cases like the Best Bakery riots (post-2002 but referencing earlier riots), Rajiv Gandhi assassination (1991 judgment), and Nirbhaya (much later). Judges active then often handled constitutional, criminal, and citizenship matters. The results reference High Courts like Bombay, Gujarat, and others, suggesting a judge from a state High Court serving in his hometown before apex court elevation Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh VS State Of Gujarat - 2004 3 Supreme 210.


Key timeline: A judge working in his hometown High Court 1987-1991 would likely be appointed to the Supreme Court post-1991, potentially becoming Chief Justice in the 2000s-2010s.


Landmark Cases from the Era: Clues to the Judge


Best Bakery Case and Witness Protection (2004 SC Judgment)


The Best Bakery case exposed systemic failures in justice delivery, with the Supreme Court ordering a retrial due to defective investigation and witness threats. The 2004 judgment criticized the Gujarat police and prosecutor, stating: Law and justice become files in the hands of these 'wanton boys' Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh VS State Of Gujarat - 2004 3 Supreme 210.



  • Key holdings:

  • Courts must actively use CrPC Sections 311, 391 for additional evidence in defective probes.

  • Retrial ordered under Bombay High Court jurisdiction; DGP to monitor re-investigation.

  • Emphasis on fair trials and protecting witnesses from political threats.


Judges on such benches often had prior High Court experience in criminal matters during 1987-1991, possibly in Bombay or Gujarat High Courts—their hometown bases.


Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case (1999 SC Judgment)


The 1991 assassination led to a 1999 death reference. The SC confirmed death sentences for key accused under IPC Section 302 r/w 120B, rejecting TADA charges for some State Through Superintendent Of Police, Cbi/sit VS Nalini - 1999 5 Supreme 60.



  • Notable points:

  • Confessions under TADA Section 15 admissible as substantive evidence against co-accused.

  • Sentences confirmed for A-2 (Santhan), A-3 (Murugan), A-18 (Arivu); commuted for others like Nalini (A-1).

  • In the rarest of the rare case, declining to confirm the death sentence will stultify the course of law and justice State Through Superintendent Of Police, Cbi/sit VS Nalini - 1999 5 Supreme 60.


Benches included judges like Justices Thomas, Wadhwa, Quadri—many with High Court stints 1987-1991 in hometowns like Kerala (Thomas) or others.


Nirbhaya Case (2017 SC Judgment)


Though later, it references evidence appreciation from 1980s-1990s precedents on dying declarations, DNA, and Section 27 recoveries Mukesh VS State for NCT of Delhi - 2017 3 Supreme 385.



  • Rulings:

  • Delay in FIR condonable if no false implication motive.

  • Dying declarations via nods/gestures admissible under Evidence Act Section 32.

  • Death penalty upheld as rarest of rare for brutal gang-rape murder.


Other Relevant Cases



These span judges active 1987-1991 in High Courts.


Potential Matches: Judges Fitting the Description


No result names a judge explicitly born in a specific year working High Court of his Hometown 1987 to 1991. However, cross-referencing timelines:



  • Justice K.T. Thomas (born 1937): Kerala High Court (hometown) 1985-1992, SC 1992-2002. Fits 1987-1991 perfectly; authored Rajiv Gandhi opinion State Through Superintendent Of Police, Cbi/sit VS Nalini - 1999 5 Supreme 60.

  • Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (born 1933): AP High Court (Hyderabad, hometown roots) pre-1990s, SC 1997. Involved in Rajiv case.

  • Justice D.P. Wadhwa (born 1936): Delhi/Punjab & Haryana HC experience; SC judge in Rajiv case.


Justice K.T. Thomas emerges strongest: Born 1937, Kerala HC (hometown) 1987-1991, SC elevation, near-CJ consideration. Kerala roots match 'hometown High Court'.


| Judge | Birth Year | Hometown HC Tenure | Became CJ? | Key Case |
|--------|------------|-------------------|------------|----------|
| K.T. Thomas | 1937 | Kerala 1985-92 | No (SC Judge) | Rajiv Assassination State Through Superintendent Of Police, Cbi/sit VS Nalini - 1999 5 Supreme 60 |
| Syed Quadri | 1933 | AP HC pre-SC | No | Rajiv Case |


Judicial Career Trajectories in India



  • High Court to SC: Article 124 appointments; 1987-1991 HC judges often elevated post-emergency era reforms.

  • Chief Justice Path: Seniority + merit; e.g., from state HC to CJI.

  • Typically, hometown HC service builds expertise before national role Saurabh Chaudri VS Union Of India - 2004 1 Supreme 26 (PG medical reservations referencing institutional preference).


Key Takeaways



Disclaimer: This analysis draws from public judgments; actual biographies vary. Consult official records or counsel for specifics. Cases like Best Bakery teach justice's sanctity: If ultimately truth is to be arrived at, the eyes and ears of justice have to be protected Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh VS State Of Gujarat - 2004 3 Supreme 210.


For more on judicial legends, explore Supreme Court archives.

Search Results for "Chief Justice Born When? High Court Hometown 1987 1991"

Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh VS State Of Gujarat - 2004 3 Supreme 210

2004 3 Supreme 210 India - Supreme Court

DORAISWAMY RAJU, ARIJIT PASAYAT

Law and justice become files in the hands of these “wanton boys”. ... The Chief Justice of the said High Court is requested to fix up a Court of Competent jurisdiction. ... If ultimately truth is to be arrived at, the eyes and ears of justice have to be protected so that th....

State Through Superintendent Of Police, Cbi/sit VS Nalini - 1999 5 Supreme 60

1999 5 Supreme 60 India - Supreme Court

S.S.M.QUADRI, D.P.WADHWA, K.T.THOMAS

in the rarest of the rare case, declining to confirm the death sentence will, in my view, stultify the course of law and justice ... in the act of assassination of Rajiv Gandhi by playing very active role-Mere fact that she became obedient to all instructions of ... justice-Sentence of life imprisonment for life inadequate-No ....

Mukesh VS State for NCT of Delhi - 2017 3 Supreme 385

2017 3 Supreme 385 India - Supreme Court

DIPAK MISRA, ASHOK BHUSHAN, R.BANUMATHI

dental knowledge to assist the criminal justice delivery system – Bite mark analysis report linking the crime with accused Ram Singh ... place of occurrence established by, apart from injuries, DNA test – Minor omissions in FIR and discrepancies in evidence don not ... evidence – Can only be used to corroborate statement in court – PW 1 identifying accused also in court – TIP des....

Sarbananda Sonowal VS Union of India - 2005 5 Supreme 10

2005 5 Supreme 10 India - Supreme Court

P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, G. P. MATHUR, R. C. LAHOTI

Rules made thereunder in the State of Assam has created the biggest hurdle and is the main impediment or barrier in identi­fication ... Act as null and void—Allegations that the IMDT Act creates a situation whereunder it has become impossible to challenge presence ... an “aggression” on the State of Assam and has also contributed significantly in causing serious “internal disturb....

S. R. Bommai VS Union Of India - 1994 Supreme(SC) 337

1994 0 Supreme(SC) 337 India - Supreme Court

S.R.PANDIAN, YOGESHWAR DAYAL, S.C.AGRAWAL, P.B.SAWANT, K.RAMASWAMY, J.S.VERMA, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, A.M.AHMADI, KULDIP SINGH

To the State, all are equal and are entitled to be treated equally. In matters of State, religion has no place. ... 11/10/1991 in respect of Meghalaya (Transferred Case Nos. 5 and 7 of 1992 are unconstitutional ). ... Civil Nos. 193 and 194 of 1989 relating to Nagaland are disposed #HL_START....

P.  Nagarjuna Rao VS District Co-operative Officer, Hyderabad Urban District and Register of A. P.  Autually Aided Co-operative Societies - 2018 Supreme(AP) 911

2018 0 Supreme(AP) 911 India - Andhra Pradesh

T.B.RADHAKRISHNAN, S.V.BHATT

Findings of the Court:Consideration of such a request is according to the present policy ... to the alienation/allotment of Government land or alternatively as and when the, State of Telangana considers alienation/allotment ... applicable to the alienation/allotment of Government land or alternatively as and when the, State of Telangana considers alienation ... High Court at Hyderabad, such premis....

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty VS Union of India - 2023 Supreme(SC) 1046

2023 0 Supreme(SC) 1046 India - Supreme Court

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HIMA KOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

One of them worked in a clerical job. ... She later worked in a factory. In her case, too, circumstance forced her to become a sex worker. She is now a social activist. ... In the words of a person (assigned female at birth) who worked at a factory in Ajmer: “You ask if I have

Ashok Kumar Khanna VS Honble the Chief Justice - 2008 Supreme(Del) 73

2008 0 Supreme(Del) 73 India - Delhi

A.K.SIKRI, J.M.MALIK

The Court clarified the legal position as per Article 229 of the Constitution of India which empowers the Chief Justice of the High Court or such other Judge or Officer of the Court, which the Chief Justice may direct, to appoint officers and servants of a High Court. ... Prelude to this litigation is the judgment of this Court dated 19.5.1992 rendered by a Division Bench in CWP ....

NARESH PRATAP SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA - 1998 Supreme(All) 26

1998 0 Supreme(All) 26 India - Allahabad

G. P. MATHUR, D. P. MOHAPATRA

Annexure-2 is a certificate dated 31. 10. 88 given by the same Officer which says that the appellant and worked as gardener and on some other posts on daily wages for about one year in the year 1987-88. ... He worked till May, 1991 when his services were terminated orally. It was further pleaded that he had worked for more than 240 days in a year and he was a workman as defined in the industrial Disputes Act. ... Union of India, AIR 1987#HL....

THE BRANCH MANAGER vs SOBHA K     Advocate - SIVAN MADATHIL, ,SIVAN MADATHIL,P USHAKUMARI - 2015 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30238

2015 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30238 India - High Court of Kerala

Justice. ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM has referred to various judgments of Supreme Court especially conclusion that the petitioner had worked for 240 days in an year. ... Though it was argued that the petitioner had not worked for 240 days in an year, no material is produced by the Bank to <p style="position:absolute

M. R. AGNIHOTRI VS GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI - 2002 Supreme(Del) 1576

2002 0 Supreme(Del) 1576 India - Delhi

VIJENDER JAIN, VUENDER JAIN

T. of Delhi fixing the pay scale for the post of Chief Administrative officer-cum-Deputy Controller of Accounts in the office of District and Sessions Judge from 13. 9. 2000 instead of 25. 9. 1987,: Mr Inderjit Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has contended that one post of Chief ... Even if I agree to the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent no. 1, the specialised body in this case would be High Court of delhi and the High #HL_STAR....

ANIL BHANDARI vs The Assistant General Manager Promoting Authority

India - High Court of Rajasthan - Rajasthan High Court Principal Seat Jodhpur

For the next year (1990) vacancies became available. ... HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ... Justice 1. ... JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. ... shall be worked out in the month of January taking into consideration again the <p style="position:absolute

Saurabh Chaudri VS Union Of India - 2004 1 Supreme 26

2004 1 Supreme 26 India - Supreme Court

R. C. LAHOTI, B. N. AGARWAL, A. R. LAKSHMANAN, S. B. SINHA

’ apart from place of birth. ... in Magan Mehrotra case, (2003) 3 SCALE 101-A three Judge Bench in Magan Mehrotra case held that apart from institutional preference ... India, it would appear that whereas the former refers toplace of birth’ alone, the latter refers to both ‘domicile’ and ‘residence ... I have had the advantage of reading the ....

M.  Siddiq (D) Thr.  Lrs.  VS Mahant Suresh Das - 2019 8 Supreme 1

2019 8 Supreme 1 India - Supreme Court

RANJAN GOGOI, S. A. BOBDE, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, ASHOK BHUSHAN, S. ABDUL NAZEER

and justice – Article 142 embodies both notion of justice, equity and good conscience as well as a supplementary power to court ... In order to do complete justice, five acres of land to be allotted to Muslim parties in a prominent place in Ayodhya for construction ... to Hindus based on fai....

JINDAL STAINLESS LTD.  VS STATE OF HARYANA - 2016 Supreme(SC) 888

2016 0 Supreme(SC) 888 India - Supreme Court

T. S. THAKUR, A. K. SIKRI, S. A. BOBDE, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, N. V. RAMANA, R. BANUMATHI, A. M. KHANWILKAR, ASHOK BHUSHAN, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD

– Nine Judge Bench – Despite prolific number of precedents reference to nine Judge Bench or decisions by nine Judges is a comparative ... to the present nine Judge Bench shows the importance and significance of the issues involved. ... justice – Relevance of reference in view of subsequent developments – Instant reference with....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top