SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI., SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HIMA KOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JJ.
Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty and Another – Petitioners
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 1011, 1020, 1105, 1141, 1142, 1150 of 2022, Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 93, 129, 159, 260, 319, 478 of 2023, T.C. (Civil) Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 of 2023
Decided On : 17-10-2023
Key Points: - The Constitution does not expressly recognize a fundamental right to marry, but facets of marital relationships reflect constitutional values like dignity and liberty (!) . - The Special Marriage Act, 1954 and the Foreign Marriage Act, 1969, as currently enacted, do not provide for same-sex marriages and cannot be interpreted to include them due to institutional limitations and the need to avoid judicial legislation (!) . - Queerness is a natural phenomenon known in India since ancient times and is not urban or elite (!) . - The right to enter into a union or an abiding cohabitational relationship is protected under Part III of the Constitution, and this right extends to persons in queer relationships (!) . - Discrimination based on sexual orientation violates Article 15 of the Constitution (!) . - Transgender persons in heterosexual relationships have the right to marry under existing laws, including personal laws (!) . - Regulation 5(3) of the Adoption Regulations, 2022, which requires a stable marital relationship for joint adoption, is ultra vires the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and violates Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution by discriminating against unmarried couples, including queer couples (!) . - The CARA Circular, which excludes single prospective adoptive parents in live-in relationships, disproportionately impacts the queer community and violates Article 15 (!) . - The Union Government is directed to form a committee to examine and recommend entitlements for queer couples in unions, covering aspects like ration cards, joint bank accounts, medical decisions, jail visitation rights, access to deceased partner's body, and legal consequences such as succession and maintenance (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) . - The State must ensure that queer persons are not discriminated against and are protected from violence and coercion, including involuntary medical treatments aimed at changing gender identity or sexual orientation (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .
JUDGMENT :
DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI.
| Table of Contents | |
| Background | |
| The decision of this Court in Navtej Singh Johar | |
| Societal violence against the queer community | |
| Submissions | |
| Reliefs sought in the proceedings | |
| Analysis | |
| This Court is vested with the authority to hear this case | |
| Article 32 vests this Court with the power to enforce the rights in Part III of the Constitution | |
| Judicial review and separation of powers | |
| The power of this Court to enforce rights under Article 32 is different from the power of the legislature to enact laws | |
| The power of judicial review must be construed in terms of the Constitution of India and not in terms of the position of law in other jurisdictions | |
| The role of courts in the democratic process | |
| Is queerness ‘un-Indian’? Who is an Indian? What practices are Indian? | |
| Queerness is a natural phenomenon which is known to India since ancient times | |
| Queerness is not urban or elite | |
| The rise of Victorian morality in colonial India and the reasons for the re-assertion of the queer identity | |
| Who is an Indian and what practices are Indian? | |
| Understanding the institution of marriage | |
| There is no universal conception of marriage | |
| The conception of marriage is not static | |
| Sati | |
| Widow remarriage | |
| Child marriage and the age of consent | |
| Other violence in marriage | |
| Inter-caste and interfaith marriage | |
| Divorce | |
| The implications of the discussion in this segment | |
| The implications of this discussion for the right of queer persons to marry | |
| The significance of marriage as a socio-legal institution | |
| The nature of fundamental rights: positive and negative postulates | |
| Approaches to identifying un-enumerated rights | |
| The scope of the State’s regulation of the ‘intimate zone’ | |
| The right to marry | |
| Have the courts recognised the right to marry? | |
| There is no fundamental right to marry | |
| The challenge to the SMA | |
| The scheme of the SMA | |
| The decision of the South African Constitutional Court in Fourie | |
| The decision of the UK House of Lords in Ghaidan | |
| Institutional limitations with respect to the interpretation of SMA | |
| The challenge to the FMA | |
| The right to enter into a union | |
| The goal of self-development and what it means to be human | |
| The rights under Article 19 | |
| The right to freedom of speech and expression and to form intimate associations | |
| The right to settle in any part of India | |
| Facets of the right to life and liberty under Article 21 | |
| The atypical family | |
| The right to dignity, autonomy, and privacy | |
| The right to health | |
| The right to freedom of conscience under Article 25 | |
| Restrictions on the right to enter into a union | |
| The right to enter into a union cannot be restricted based on sexual orientation | |
| Recognizing the right of queer persons to enter into a union will not lead to social chaos | |
| The right of transgender persons to marry | |
| Sex, gender, sexual orientation | |
| The judgment of this Court in NALSA and the Transgender Persons Act | |
| Transgender persons in heterosexual relationships can marry under existing law | |
| The right against discrimination under the Transgender Persons Act | |
| Remedies for the infringement of Section 3 | |
| Harmonious interpretation of the laws governing marriage and the Transgender Persons Act | |
| The conditions for the exercise of the rights of LGBTQ persons | |
| The right of queer persons under the Mental Healthcare Act | |
| The right of LGBTQ persons to freedom from coercion from their families, the | |
(1) Same sex marriage – There is no unqualified right to marriage guaranteed by Constitution – Marriage is a social institution and in our country, it is conditioned by culture, religion, customs and....
A law which encroaches upon privacy will have to withstand the touchstone of permissible restrictions on fundamental rights. In the context of Article 21 an invasion of privacy must be justified on t....
The right to live together in an interfaith relationship is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution, guarding personal liberty against familial and societal coercion.
Point of Law : Any person of any religion who performs any act of conversion to another religion would fall within the ambit of ‘religion convertor’, and such conversion not performed in accordance w....
Live-in-relationships are recognized as part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21, but lack specific legal recognition, necessitating legislative action for protection.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.