AI Overview

AI Overview...

References: - Rasala Surya Prakasarao VS Rasala Venkateswararao - Andhra Pradesh - Assia VS Ayidru - Kerala - Pathima Sultan Animal (died) VS S. Hamed Oli - Madras - Sukhraji W/o Puran Prasad VS Puran Prasad S/o Dhuldhul Ram - Chhattisgarh - Dharmeshbhai Dolatrai Desai VS Hetal @ Doli Dharmeshbhai Desai W/O Dharmesh Dolatbhai Desai - Gujarat - Manoj Kumar S/o Rangila Baitha vs Sushma Dey, W/o Manoj Kumar, D/o Ram Sewak Dey - Jharkhand - Deva Bulli Venkanna, S/o. Venkateswarlu VS State of A. P. , Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat - Andhra Pradesh

Search Results for "Child Inheritence can t be Ended just because of Divorce of Parents"

Assia  VS Ayidru

1974 0 Supreme(Ker) 197 India - Kerala

V.KHALID

Claim - Evidence Act, Section 112 Fact of the Case: The petitioner filed an application claiming maintenance for her child ... Finding of the Court: The court ordered a blood test, and the report excluded the respondent as the father of the child ... Decision: The criminal revision petition was dismissed, and the blood test results ruled out the respondent's paternity of the child ... The marriage ended in divorce on 17th May 1972, by mediation, and the respondent agreed to pay a monthly allowance of....

Sukhraji W/o Puran Prasad VS Puran Prasad S/o Dhuldhul Ram

2017 0 Supreme(Chh) 50 India - Chhattisgarh

DEEPAK GUPTA

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 125 – Dismissal of grant of maintenance - Order for maintenance of wives, children and parents ... to maintain and I do hope that he would not claim that this third lady is not his wife and that child is not his child - Amount ... (not being a married daughter) who has attained majority, where such child is, by reason of any physical or mental abnormality or ... Order for maintenance of wives, children and parents. ... It is true as urged by Shri Tiwari, learne....

Pathima Sultan Animal (died) VS S.  Hamed Oli

1997 0 Supreme(Mad) 1369 India - Madras

K.SAMPATH

The doctrine of acknowledgment is based on the assumption of a lawful union between the parents of the acknowledged child. ... As I have already pointed out, the mere fact that Rahmatia was married once before does not necessarily show that the subsequent marriage was not legal, because the former marriage may have legally ended either by divorce or death.” ... The acknowledgment of legitimacy proceeds upon the basis of a prior lawful relationship between the parents. ... The doctrine, however, is not a....

Reeta Bharat Arora (Smt. ) and others and Lajrani Yashodanandan Dhingra VS Bharat Yasodanandan Arora @ Dhingra and others

2001 0 Supreme(Bom) 519 India - Bombay

UPASANI PRATIBHA, T.K.CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS

HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 ... Sections 13 and 15- Ex parte decree of divorce ... - Where ex parte decree of divorce passed against wife, the husband giving undertaking for not remarrying for 30 days from the date ... - Where ex parte decree of divorce passed against wife, the husband giving undertaking for not remarrying for 30 days from the date ... Both Rajendra Kumar and Sarla Gupta filed suit against each other praying for a decree of divorce. These suits ended in a decree of divorce#HL_END....

Rasala Surya Prakasarao VS Rasala Venkateswararao

1992 0 Supreme(AP) 104 India - Andhra Pradesh

D.JAGANNADHA RAJU, V.SIVARAMAN NAIR

A child of void marriage is related to its parents within the meaning of Sec. 3 (i) (j) of the Hindu Succession. ... Such a child is also entitled to rights of succession under the Hindu Succession Act. ... The proviso forbids conferment of any right on the legitimatized child in the property of any person other than the parents, where, but for the passing of the Act, such child could have been incapable of possession or acquiring any such rights by reason of his not being the legitima....

Dharmeshbhai Dolatrai Desai VS Hetal @ Doli Dharmeshbhai Desai W/O Dharmesh Dolatbhai Desai

2011 0 Supreme(Guj) 443 India - Gujarat

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.B.PARDIWALA

He submitted that on the other hand respondent-wife has no means of income as both the parents, who were serving, have now retired. ... We may only mention that till the amount is not paid, the petition for divorce cannot be disposed of and the petition for divorce will remain pending. Dharmeshbhai Dolatrai Desai (husband) will be liable to pay the monthly maintenance as ordered by this Court. ... Due to persuasion of their well-wishers, friends, etc., they intend to settle the dispute by converting the 'petition for divorce#HL_....

Manoj Kumar S/o Rangila Baitha vs Sushma Dey, W/o Manoj Kumar, D/o Ram Sewak Dey

2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1556 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR

(A) Family Courts Act, 1984 - Section 19(1) - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) - Appeal against dismissal of divorce ... claims of cruelty and abandonment by wife - The court found insufficient evidence to support allegations and dismissed the suit for divorce ... High Court had the power to reassess findings of fact and law, affirming the Family Court's lack of discretion in dismissing the divorce ... Submission has been made that though education and upbringing of the son is responsibility of both the parents#....

Deva Bulli Venkanna, S/o.  Venkateswarlu VS State of A. P. , Rep.  by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat

2023 0 Supreme(AP) 1113 India - Andhra Pradesh

RAVI NATH TILHARI, B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI

A marriage is deemed to have ended only after a formal divorce is declared by a Court of law. ... The petitioner's case is that the petitioner is married to one Kamala Kumari and blessed with a child. Due to some disputes between them she filed some cases against the petitioner including MC, 498-A etc. The petitioner also filed divorce OP against his wife. ... They did not claim for protection of the marital relationship which was allegedly being interfered with by their parents or relatives. ... There ....

Kumari Baghyavathi VS Smt. Lakshmikanthammal (Deceased) and Others, Defendants

1992 0 Supreme(Mad) 220 India - Madras

THANGAMANI

The parents-in-law of Gajalakshmi did not permit her to join in the suit. We cannot say that this is a satisfactory explanation for the non-joinder of the 4th defendant initially in this action. ... Since the Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act 6 of 1949 came into force on 29-3-1949 there could not have been any impediment to the parties contracting a valid marriage. ... 25. ... Srinivasulu Naidu and Rajalakshmi the parents of the plaintiff is given as No.12, Sambier street in the year 1951. Ex In P8 T.V. Licence for the peri....

Upendra Rai S/o Late Brahmdeo Rai VS State of Bihar

2017 0 Supreme(Pat) 12 India - Patna

ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI

The alleged divorce suit ended in a judgment on 23.08.1996, as stated in paragraph-9 of the quashing application so apparently divorce suit ended in a decree in favour of the petitioners of this quashing application. ... the parents house. ... paving a way of inheritance. ... It has been further stated that when she was living at her parents house the petitioners insisted on their demand for Rs. one lac failing which she will have to remain at her parents#HL....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top