Back
RAVI NATH TILHARI, B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Deva Bulli Venkanna, S/o. Venkateswarlu – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.
Heard Sri V. V. L. N. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Y. N. Vivekananda, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 4.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to produce the person of "A" daughter of the respondent No.5 (We have not mentioned the full particulars as in the prayer, but are referring to the alleged detenue as "A") before this Court and to set her at liberty and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
3. The petitioner's case is that the petitioner is married to one Kamala Kumari and blessed with a child. Due to some disputes between them she filed some cases against the petitioner including MC, 498-A etc. The petitioner also filed divorce OP against his wife.
4. With respect to the prayer for Writ of Habeas Corpus to produce the daughter of the respondent No.5, "A", the petitioner's case is that she is major and came to the petitioner's place in the Month of July, 2023. They have been living to
The court ruled that the right to protection under Article 21 does not extend to relationships deemed illegal or immoral, emphasizing constitutional morality over societal norms.
Live-in relationships are legally recognized, and individuals have the right to choose partners, protected under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution.
The judgment establishes the principle that consenting adults have the right to engage in a live-in-relationship without interference from external authorities, in accordance with their individual ch....
The court emphasized that the issue of custody in the context of matrimonial disputes should be addressed through the Family Court.
The court ruled that a live-in relationship cannot be protected under law if one party is a minor at its inception and no application for conversion has been filed as mandated by the Uttar Pradesh Pr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
