Mobile phones and social media enable communication but also pose risks such as illicit relationships, coercion, and exploitation. For instance, technology facilitates clandestine interactions leading to legal issues like sexual offenses and forced relationships MANU @ EDWARD Vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala, R. Thiagarajan VS Superintendent of Police, Trichy District - Madras.
Legal and Forensic Aspects Involving Technology
DNA testing, often facilitated by bio-technology centers, is crucial in establishing paternity and verifying relationships affected by digital evidence. Courts rely on DNA reports to determine legitimacy, paternity, and support claims, especially in cases of illegitimate children or disputed relationships RAJEEVAN vs LIJI - Kerala, Babu VS R Sunil Kumar - Kerala, K K JAIPAL vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala.
Child Welfare and Legal Protections
Laws such as the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and provisions under the Indian Evidence Act emphasize safeguarding children's rights and establishing the truth through technological evidence like DNA tests. Courts have addressed issues like child marriage, minors' age, and the validity of relationships in the context of technological evidence R. Thiagarajan VS Superintendent of Police, Trichy District - Madras, Babu VS R Sunil Kumar - Kerala.
Risks and Challenges
Technology significantly influences children's relationships, offering both benefits and challenges. While it facilitates communication and evidence collection, it also introduces risks such as exploitation and false claims. Legal systems increasingly rely on technological evidence like DNA tests to resolve disputes related to paternity, legitimacy, and abuse. Ensuring children's safety and rights requires a balanced approach that leverages technology responsibly and enforces protective laws effectively.
References: - Senjuti Pal VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta - ANU SHANTHI vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala - MANU @ EDWARD Vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala - RAJEEVAN vs LIJI - Kerala - CHATHAN POOZHIKUTHU vs KALLIANI - Kerala - Ms. X vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) through SHO, PS Saket - Delhi - K K JAIPAL vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala - Babu VS R Sunil Kumar - Kerala - R. Thiagarajan VS Superintendent of Police, Trichy District - Madras - P. Gopalakrishnan @ Dileep VS State of Kerala - Kerala
A void marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, does not dissolve the legal matrimonial relationship between the parties until ... There is no provision in the Rules that debars a widower from receiving family pension due to the existence of a void marriage relationship ... Court: The Court held that the respondent's second marriage was void under the Hindu Marriage Act, but his legal matrimonial relationship ... The respondent no.8 was employed at Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur and from her matrimonial #....
Information Technology Act requires no interference. Information Technology Act , 2000 and therefore, his evidence is not legally admissible. Information Technology Act , 2000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. 9.
The victim claimed coercion into an illicit relationship through threats of exposure. ... Procedure - Cr.P.C Section 439; IPC Section 376; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Sections 3 and 4; Information Technology ... Fact of the Case: The applicant was accused of sexual offenses against a married woman and her child. ... Their relationship continued unabated. Later, she mended her relationship with her husband and they started staying together. Even thereafter, the victim continued her ....
In order to find out the paternity of the child they were referred to the Rajeev Gandhi Centre for Bio-technology, Thiruvananthapuram and the report was in her favour of the first petitioner to the effect that the revision petitioner is the father of the child. ... So it is clear that the father was not in good relationship with the son. It is also seen that father had deposed about a marriage karar in that suit. ... The first petitioner was admitted in the General Hospital at Thalassery and she gave birth to the #HL_ST....
The mother claimed the father failed to provide support, while the father denied the relationship. ... Fact of the Case: The appeal was against a family court order awarding maintenance to a minor child. ... Issues: The main issues were the legitimacy of the marriage and the establishment of paternity for the minor child to determine ... So Ext.P1 and P2 coupled with evidence of PW1 indicates about the premarital relationship between the revision petitioner and Kallyani and also the child born to the....
It is only after the separation that the Prosecutrix allegedly became friendly with the Respondent and a child was begotten from their relationship. ... It is in that context that the Application for DNA test was filed to establish that the child so born was not from the relationship of the Petitioner and the Respondent. ... There can be no better evidence than the DNA Test, to support the assertions of the Prosecutrix that it is the forcible sexual relationship between her and the Respondent that had m....
Fact of the Case: The petitioner, accused under Section 498A IPC, was sued by the third respondent citing cruelty in their relationship ... illicit relationship with another person prior to the marriage of third respondent with the petitioner. ... Annexure-3 judgment also shows that report of examination of DNA test, both by Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Bio-Technology and CDFC, Hyderabad establish that petitioner is not the biological father of the child born to third respondent, which justifies the case of the petitioner....
Section 125(1)(b) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Section 112 According to Section 125(1)(b) of Criminal Procedure Code,- The illegitimate child ... The petitioner herein filed objection to the above Crl.M.P. contending that the respondent was born at the time when the valid marital relationship between the mother of the child, and Jayaprasad was subsisting. ... The court below, after considering the rival contentions, passed the impugned order allowing the petition by directing the respondent to undergo DNA test in Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Bio-....
Habeas Corpus - Detention of Alleged Detenue - Majority Act, 1875, Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 - The court discussed the ... The court highlighted the provisions of the Majority Act, 1875 and the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 in this context. ... age of majority, and the issue of marriage of minors in the context of the legal provisions under the Majority Act, 1875 and the Child ... Technology, social media, particularly, mobile phones, though enabled many, to reach out and communicate, but at the same time, ....
Conspiracy - IPC, IT Act - 120(B), 342, 366, 376(D), 411, 506(1), 201, 212 & 34 IPC and sections 66 (E) & 67(A) of the Information Technology ... The petitioner herein had married a leading actress and a child was born in the matrimonial relationship. Subsequently, matrimonial disputes arose in their family, ultimately leading to a judicial separation. ... The 11th accused in Crime No.297/2017 of Nedumbassery Police station for offences punishable under sections 120(B), 342,366,376(D),411,506(1),201,212 & 34 IPC and sections 66 (E) & 67(A....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.