AI Overview...
-
Haryana & Supreme Court Decisions - The Supreme Court (2025 INSC 162) has addressed issues related to criminal proceedings and the interpretation of legal provisions, emphasizing adherence to procedural correctness and the importance of following established legal standards Bava Bagurudeen @ Bagurudeen vs The State of Tamil Nadu - Madras.
-
Criminal Law & Procedure - The Court has reinforced that in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, the legal approach should align with the principles laid out in prior rulings, such as in Kashif (2024 INSC 1045). It also highlighted that the registration and investigation processes, including complaint lodging and production before magistrates, are crucial steps in ensuring fair trials AMAR BAHADUR vs STATE OF HP - Himachal Pradesh, Mohd. Abdul Ayaz vs State of Telangana - Telangana.
-
Judicial Precedents & Interpretation - Several recent judgments, including Sambasiva Rao (2025 INSC 868), Sunil Kumar K. (2025 INSC 1463), and Madan Lal (2025 INSC 1045), underscore the Court's reliance on precedents for interpreting criminal procedure and evidentiary standards, especially concerning statements under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC P.V.Mathew vs State, Rep. By Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam - Kerala.
-
Preventive Detention & Legal Framework - The Court clarified the scope of preventive detention laws (2025 INSC 239), emphasizing that the legal provisions must be strictly interpreted, and that supporting citations do not bolster unsupported arguments. The case references include A.K. Roy and other landmark judgments Anil Baburao Baile vs Union of India - Bombay.
-
Case Management & Procedural Developments - The Court noted procedural undertakings by parties to ensure court appearances and compliance with directions, exemplified by the Madurai High Court order dated 04.03.2025, reflecting ongoing efforts to uphold judicial process integrity Additional Superintendent of Police, CBI:ACB:Chennai vs G. Elangovan S/o.S.K.Gopal - Madras.
-
Offense Cognizance & Jurisdiction - The Court reiterated that cognizance of offenses is a one-time process (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1606), and procedural irregularities, such as missing committal orders, can impact trial validity, emphasizing the importance of jurisdictional correctness State Of Kerala vs Jithakumar K., S/o. Kamalasanan Nair - Kerala.
-
Legal Interpretations & Statutory Analysis - The Supreme Court's analysis of the Copyright Act, 1957, in Engineering Analysis Center (2021 INSC 137), and other tax-related cases like MOL Corporation (2024), demonstrates the Court's approach to statutory interpretation and the importance of precise legal reasoning in complex statutory frameworks Arista Networks Limited vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The 2025 INSC 162 judgment consolidates principles of procedural fidelity, adherence to precedents, and statutory interpretation within criminal and civil law contexts. It underscores the Court's commitment to ensuring justice through proper procedural conduct, correct application of legal standards, and reliance on authoritative precedents. The decision reflects a broader judicial trend towards meticulous legal scrutiny and procedural correctness in complex cases.
Search Results for "Citation 2025 Insc 162"
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67428 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUNDER MOHAN, J
State of Haryana and another , Neutral Citation: 2025 INSC 162, and the recent judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mihir Rajesh Shah vs. State of Maharashtra and another , Neutral Citation: 2025 INSC 1288 . 5. It is seen that the petitioners in Crl.O.P. ... [renumbered as Crime No.7 of 2025, on the file of NIB-CID, Sivagangai] dated 10.01.2025 and 12.01.2025, respectively. ... (MD) No.10346 of 2025#....
2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 5756 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
State of Haryana & Anr’, Neutral Citation No.2025 INSC 162, decided on 07.02.2025. 9. ... The view of this Court is being guided by the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.5544 of 2024, titled as ‘Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif’, Neutral Citation No.2024 INSC 1045, wherein, it has been held that in case of commercial quantity of the contraband, the accused ... CrMP(M) No.1305 of 2025 Reserved on : 19.06.2025....
2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 949 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
09.04.2025 at 1130 AMComplaint was lodged at PS09.04.2025 at 1130 AM10.04.2025 at 0030 AMThe accused were produced before Hon’ble Magistrate Upon perusal of the above entries
2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 3012 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
Another decision of the Apex Court reported in [2025 KHC 6618 : 2025 INSC 868 : 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1463], Sambasiva Rao M. v. ... Following the said decision as well as the decision of the Apex Court reported in [(2025) 4 SCC 624], Madan Lal v. ... In this context, it is relevant to refer the decision of this Court reported in [2025 KHC OnLine 983], Sunil Kumar K. v. State of Kerala, in Crl.Appeal No.323/2020, dated 12.9.2025, wherein in paragraph No. 12, it was held ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 10214 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J. C. DOSHI, J
Satish Atmaram Talekar & others, bearing neutral citation 2020 INSC 433, more particularly in para 7, which reads as under:- “7. The restoration of the complaint by the Additional Sessions Judge was undoubtedly to the prejudice of the appellant. ... ORAL ORDER ORDER IN BOTH CR.M.A.s (FOR AMENDMENT) NO.1 of 2025 Amendment by way of Civil Application No.1 of 2025 in both the matters is allowed. Amendment in the respective matters to be carried out forthwith. ... Application No.162 of 2012 before the Chief....
2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1757 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, P. M. RAVAL
CitationParty nameParticulars1(2022) 7 SCC 581Ravinder Singh Alias Kaku Vs State of PunjabFailure to produce 65-B certificate.2(2014) 10 SCC 473 Anvar P.V. Vs P.K.Basheer & Ors. ... A statement under Section 164 CrPC is not subjected to the constraints attached with a statement under Section 161 CrPC and the vigour of Section 162 CrPC does not apply to a statement under Section 164 CrPC. Therefore, it must be considered on a better footing. ... Shambhubhai Gandubhai Kotadia Patel has expired pending the appeal on 8.2.2025 and photocopy of....
2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 1056 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S.GADKARI, NEELA GOKHALE
2024 INSC 239 has explained the meaning of the concept ‘Preventive Detention’. ... Time was granted and the matter was listed on 24th June 2025. Mr. Anil Singh, learned ASG appeared in the matter and made submissions on our queries. ... The citations and the decisions cited by the Petitioner do not lend any strength or support to the arguments canvassed by the Petitioner. III) A Five Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in its decision in the case of A.K.Roy v. ... He also submitted additional Written Submissions dated 4th July 20....
2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 2331 • India - BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
They also undertook to appear before this Court on 07.04.2025. 2024 INSC 503 ( MIR Mustafa Ali Hasmi Vs. The State of A.P. , Crl.Appeal.No.1904 of 2014 (RooP.W.anti Vs. State of Haryana) 19.4. ... that the order dated 04.03.2025, passed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in Crl.A. ... Sequence of events from 04.03.2025:- After the pronouncement of the order of conviction on 04.03.2025, all the counsel on record undertook to ensure the appearance of respondents before this Court to answer the q....
2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2612 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
State of U.P. and Another , [2025 SCC OnLine SC 1606] Cognizance of an offence can only be taken once. ... Bhooraji And Others, 2001 INSC 393 the Apex Court had occasion to delve into the question as regards irregular proceedings. The question raised was whether the absence of a committal order to the Special Court would vitiate the entire trial as one conducted without jurisdiction. ... In RC 5 18.08.2010 (Ext. 203)For Crime 703/2005 Before JFCM V Thiruvananthapuram on 25/08/2009 Ext.P 32In RC 5 30.09.2010 Ext.P 19718.8.2010 Ext.204Examined as PW 16 on 8/....
2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 3298 • India - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Bangalore Bench)
Prashant Maharishi, VP, Soundararajan K., J
Honorable Supreme court in Engineering Analysis Center of excellence ( P ) Ltd v CIT 125 taxmann.com 42 (sc) Neutral Citation: 2021 INSC 137 [MANU/SC/0137/2021] has considered the provision of the Copyright Act ,1957 and has held as under :- "34. ... Pronounced in the open court on this 23rd day of June, 2025. ... We have also been shown the decision of Honourable supreme court in case of MOL Corporation [2024] 162 taxmann.com 198 (SC)/ [2024] 299 Taxman 506 (SC) [2024] 167 taxmann.com 45 (SC)/ [2024] 301 Taxman 402 (S....
Filter by Legal Phrase
