Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Additional Superintendent of Police, CBI:ACB:Chennai – Appellant
Versus
G. Elangovan S/o.S.K.Gopal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The CBI filed the appeal challenging the acquittal judgment passed by the learned II Additional District Judge for CBI Cases, Madurai, in C.C.No.1 of 2007 dated 06.06.2016.
2.The Respondents Nos.1 to 4 had been ranked as A1 to A4 respectively before the trial Court.
3. For the sake of convenience, the rank followed by the court below is taken herein for better appreciation of this case.
4. A1 was working as the Superintendent of the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Appeals, Trichy. A2 was the Commissioner of the State Office. A3 was another Superintendent of the State Office. They conspired together during the year 2006 in Trichy and other places to demand and accept illegal gratification and in pursuance of the said conspiracy, A1 demanded Rs.20,000/- as illegal gratification, as a reward from Mr.Sathyamurthy, Managing Partner of Balaji Steel, Pudukottai, for having the appellate order passed by A2 revised by reducing the penalty from Rs.4,87,292 to Rs.1,00,000. The said demand was reiterated on 20.02.2006. Therefore, P.W.10, made a complaint to P.W.20. Upon verification of the complaint, P.W.20 registered the case and arranged a trap by calling official witnesses P
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
