AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Convictions for outraging modesty can be based solely on the prosecutrix's testimony if her account is credible, consistent, and inspires confidence. While corroboration is desirable, it is not an absolute requirement. The courts recognize that even minimal acts or gestures can constitute outraging modesty under Section 354 IPC. Therefore, the sole testimony of the complainant can be sufficient for conviction, provided it meets the standards of credibility and reliability Ravinder Kumar alias Kala VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, Chandra Mohan Sarkar VS State of Tripura - Tripura, Kanubhai Bhikhabhai Raval VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat.

References:
- Ravinder Kumar alias Kala VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana
- SALEEM PASHA v/s STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka
- JEEWAN VS STATE OF (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI - Delhi
- SATHIAN vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala
- Bidhi Chand VS State Of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh
- PARASHURAMAPPA vs STATE BY - Karnataka
- Kanubhai Bhikhabhai Raval VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat
- Satyanarayan Yadav vs State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh
- Chandra Mohan Sarkar VS State of Tripura - Tripura
- Tarachand VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan

Search Results for "Conviction can be Based on Sole Testimony of Complainant in Case of Outraging Modesty"

Ravinder Kumar alias Kala VS State of Punjab

2019 0 Supreme(P&H) 1550 India - Punjab and Haryana

RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI

(D) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.154--Delay in lodging FIR--Outraging modesty of woman--Sole testimony ... Case based on sole testimony of prosecutrix which is not corroborated by any evidence--There was unexplained delay of 22 days in ... of Prosecutrix--When there is no corroboration and the case is based on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix and the explanation ... Ses....

SALEEM PASHA v/s STATE OF KARNATAKA

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 10056 India - High Court of Karnataka

MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH, J

(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 342 and 354 - Conviction for offences of wrongful confinement and outraging modesty - Concurrent ... testimony and the adequacy of corroborative evidence for conviction. ... and convincing, and the absence of corroboration in this case raised doubts about the conviction. ... It is further submitted that except the evidence of PW.2, none of the witnesses have supported the case in respect of the alleged molestation and....

JEEWAN VS STATE OF (GOVT.  OF NCT) DELHI

2016 0 Supreme(Del) 3561 India - Delhi

S.P.GARG

testimony to base a conviction solely on it. ... The prosecution's case was based on the testimony of the prosecutrix and other witnesses. ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner was convicted under Section 354 IPC for outraging the modesty of the prosecutrix at ... Conviction recorded by the Courts below is solely based upon the sole testimony of the prosecutrix ‘X’. Needless to ....

SATHIAN vs STATE OF KERALA

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15065 India - High Court of Kerala

G. GIRISH, J

testimony, rendering the conviction unsafe. ... The reliance on the sole oral testimony was deemed insufficient. ... for trespassing and assaulting a complainant. ... The prosecution case is that on 30.04.2000, at about 7.30 p.m, the petitioner along with the first accused in the crime, criminally trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant at Edathala Panchayat and subjected her and her mother to physical assault, in addition to outraging....

Bidhi Chand VS State Of Himachal Pradesh

2018 0 Supreme(HP) 1349 India - Himachal Pradesh

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN

Section 354 IPC - Outraging Modesty - 354 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 354 IPC - The court discussed the meaning of ... Issues: The issues revolved around the allegations of outraging the modesty of the victim, the use of criminal force, and ... The court emphasized that the essence of a woman's modesty is her sex and that the ultimate test for ascertaining whether modesty ... and would further argue that this fact duly stands supported in the testimony of....

PARASHURAMAPPA vs STATE BY

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 10842 India - Karnataka High Court

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 376 and 448 - Conviction for rape and criminal trespass - Accused found guilty of outraging ... modesty under Section 354 IPC instead of rape due to lack of evidence; conviction for criminal trespass under Section 448 IPC upheld ... but did indicate an attempt to outrage modesty. ... Even accused had committed criminal trespass into the house of the complainant and was found sleeping on the person of PW.5, thereby, committed offence of o....

Kanubhai Bhikhabhai Raval VS State of Gujarat

2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 353 India - Gujarat

RAJESH H.SHUKLA

Indian Penal Code, 1860—Section 354, 509—Present appeal arises from conviction under Sec. 354 and 509—Sec. 354 refers to 'assault ... force—It is a well-settled law that for attracting the provisions of Sec. 354 even the gesture is sufficient for the purpose of outraging ... the modesty—Essence of a woman's modesty is her sex—Alternate submission about modification and reduction of sentence also cannot ... In any view of the matter, it is also well-settled that on such issues like rape or outraging the ....

Satyanarayan Yadav vs State of Chhattisgarh

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 7074 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

Rajani Dubey, J

(Paras 19, 20) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The appellant was convicted for raping the complainant ... The court emphasized that the sole testimony of the prosecutrix must inspire confidence and not be improbable. ... for rape - The trial court convicted the appellant based on the victim's testimony; however, the appeal court found substantial ... Officer (PW-11) that first he lodged the report only for outraging her modesty and after 20 days of....

Chandra Mohan Sarkar VS State of Tripura

2022 0 Supreme(Tri) 323 India - Tripura

S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY

Principles for conviction based on sole eyewitness account - Conviction supported by prosecutrix's consistent testimony despite absence ... IPC for outraging the modesty of a woman - Petitioners convicted with inadequate sentence contrary to minimum prescribed terms, ... that a solitary witness's testimony can support a conviction if it is credible, and the sentence below statutory minima was declared ... In the said judgment Hon'bl....

Tarachand VS State of Rajasthan

2001 0 Supreme(Raj) 293 India - Rajasthan

ARUN MADAN

served Fact of the Case: The petitioner, a teacher, was convicted under Section 354, IPC for outraging the modesty ... U.P. - Legal principles discussed: Admissibility of hearsay evidence, competency of child witnesses, scrutiny of child witness testimony ... on the testimonies of the victim girls, citing legal principles related to the competency of child witnesses, scrutiny of their testimony ... It was a case where the evidence of child witness lacked corroboration of other prosecu....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top