AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Correction of Kharsa Girdwari - Summary Proceedings & Evidence Requirements
  • Main Points & Insights:
    • Correction of khasra girdwari entries is governed by specific rules (e.g., Rule 66) under the Land Revenue Act, requiring proper procedures for amendments (01800012537).
    • Summary proceedings for correction are limited in scope; they do not permit the Revenue Officers to change entries based solely on summary procedures without proper evidence or reasons (01800031061, 01800001868).
    • Courts have emphasized that such corrections cannot be made in summary without proper evaluation of evidence and adherence to legal procedures (01800031061, 01800001868, 02300071507).
    • Evidence is crucial in correction cases; mere entries or allegations without supporting proof are insufficient for rectification (01800031061, 02300074762).
    • Revisional authorities exceeded their jurisdiction by re-evaluating evidence without proper basis, indicating that corrections should follow prescribed legal channels and evidentiary standards (01800020769).
  • Need for Evidence & Legal Procedure:
  • Main Points & Insights:
    • Courts consistently held that corrections require substantive evidence; summary proceedings are not a substitute for proper proof (01800031061, 02300074762).
    • Unauthorized collection or evaluation of evidence by authorities beyond their jurisdiction invalidates correction orders (01800001868).
    • In cases where no evidence supports correction, the entries in revenue records should be maintained as they are (01800001868).
  • Conclusion:
  • Corrections to Kharsa Girdwari in summary proceedings are limited and require adherence to legal procedures and evidence standards. Authorities cannot arbitrarily or summarily alter revenue entries without proper proof, and courts emphasize the importance of following due process to ensure the integrity of land records (01800031061, 01800001868, 02300071507).

Search Results for "Correction of Kharsa Girdwari is Summary Proceeding no Need of Evidence"

Kahan Singh VS Radha Singh

2014 0 Supreme(HP) 2036 India - Himachal Pradesh

NARINDER CHAUHAN

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the petitioners' claim lacked legal basis as they failed to provide evidence of the ... Finding of the Court: The court upheld the orders of the revenue authorities, stating that the petitioners failed to provide evidence ... Land Revenue Act - Correction of Revenue Entries - Section 35 of the H.P. ... the latest and subsequent jamabandi cannot be changed by Revenue Officers, in summary#HL_E....

Kunj Lal VS Union Of India

2005 0 Supreme(J&K) 188 India - Jammu and Kashmir

PERMOD KOHLI

Injunction - Possession Dispute - Land Revenue Act - [KEYWORD] - [SUBJECT] - [Land Revenue Act] - [Summary of the court's discussion ... on possession dispute, documentary evidence, and the legal principles governing injunction and possession rights.] ... Ratio Decidendi: The possession dispute required evidence, and the refusal of injunction without establishing lack of possession ... This communication, however, clearly admits the entrie....

Charan Dass deceased through LRs VS Subhadra Devi

2016 0 Supreme(HP) 1911 India - Himachal Pradesh

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, SANDEEP SHARMA

had exceeded its revisional powers by upsetting the concurrent findings of the revenue authorities without proper evaluation of evidence ... Appeals) had exceeded its revisional powers and emphasized the limitations of revisional jurisdiction, particularly in re-evaluating evidence ... officers cannot change them in summary proceedings under the provisions of Punjab Land Revenue Act and in such case only course ... Record ....

Kuldeep Singh VS Rajinder Singh

2019 0 Supreme(P&H) 2410 India - Punjab and Haryana

AMOL RATTAN SINGH

Issues: The issues revolved around the correction of the khasra numbers in the agreement and whether the amendment should ... Amendment - Specific Relief Act - 26 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Summary of the acts and sections referenced and discussed ... However, the court found that the correction in the revenue record was not existent at the time the application seeking amendment ... led in evidence#HL_EN....

HIRA SINGH THAKUR VS BALI RAM

1996 0 Supreme(HP) 88 India - Himachal Pradesh

A.L.VAIDYA

without reasons and that he has gone beyond his authorised and legitimate revisional jurisdiction as he had no authority to collect evidence ... It has been brought to the notice of this Court that application for correction of Khasra Girdawari entry though filed in the year ... which are summary in nature, the entries in the record of right had to prevail. ... is to be ignored and, secondly, within the r....

Bahadur VS Mohinder Kumar

2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 196 India - Punjab and Haryana

ANIL KSHETARPAL

Punjab Courts Act, 1918, Section 41 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 100 - The judgment discussed the relevant facts and evidence ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the plaintiffs failed to prove adverse possession and that the defendants provided evidence ... The court emphasized the need to thoroughly examine adverse possession claims and highlighted key legal principles from Saroop Singh ... On the careful perusal of....

BALBIR SINGH VS A. D. M. (REVENUE)

1995 0 Supreme(Del) 13 India - Delhi

D.P.WADHWA, DEVENDER GUPTA

Girdwari. ... Rule 56 onwards deal with the entries to be made in the Khasra girdwari. ... Rule 66 is concerned with changes to be made in the Khasra Girdwari. As noted earlier.

NATHU RAM VS KALLAN DEVI

1997 0 Supreme(HP) 223 India - Himachal Pradesh

ARUN KUMAR GOEL

POSSESSION GRANTED TO OWNERS IN ABSENCE OF SPECIFIC PRAYER - TENANCY NOT ESTABLISHED - WRONGFUL ENTRY IN REVENUE RECORDS - VOID CORRECTION ... There was no evidence to show how and in what circumstances the tenancy was created in favor of defendant No. 1. b. ... The High Court held that the plaintiff and defendant No. 2 were the owners of the suit land based on the following evidence: a. ... Need-less to point out here t....

Simrat Randhawa VS State Of Punjab

2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 5 India - Punjab and Haryana

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

The application for correction of khasra girdawari of property at villages Bir Bahadurgarh, Nasirpur and Sultanwind is also pending ... It also comes out from the order of the appellate Court that an application for correction of khasra girdawari was moved by the plaintiffs ... to a person against whom proceedings for maintenance have been initiated as the latter would ....

Narain Dass (Through His L. R. S. ) VS Jai Kishan

2000 0 Supreme(P&H) 773 India - Punjab and Haryana

M.L.SINGHAL

Displaced Persons - Land Allotment - Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, Section 33 - Summary of Acts ... The court emphasized the need for the defendant to seek relief through the Tribunal or civil court for possession of the land. ... The court highlighted that the Act categorically excludes claims of mortgagees and emphasized the need for mortgagees to seek relief ... He also relied on Fard Taqsim and K....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top