SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Rajiv Narain Raina, J.
Simrat Randhawa - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. - Respondents
CWP No. 4744 of 2018
Decided On : 23-01-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Bhavnik Mehta, Mr. Ashok Kumar, Mr. Gautam Pathania, Ms. Gurneet Sagoo and Ms. Harmanjit Kaur, Advocates, for the petitioner.; Mr. Atul Nanda, Senior Advocate & Advocate General, Punjab with Ms. Anu Pal, DAG, Punjab, for the State of Punjab.; Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.S.Momi, Advocate, for the Respondent; Mr. Baldev Raj Mahajan, Senior Advocate & Advocate General, Haryana, with Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG Haryana, for the State of Haryana.; Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Senior Advocate & Additional Solicitor General of India, with Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the UOI.

Headnote:(A) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 22 - Punjab Action Plan, 2014 - Eviction order against daughter-in-law challenged as ultra vires - Court held the provisions for eviction are not encompassed within the Act's intent to ensure senior citizens' maintenance and welfare. The Plan, lacking legislative backing, is arbitrary, oppressive, and unconstitutional. (Paras 1-119)

Facts of the case:
The respondent mother-in-law filed for eviction of her daughter-in-law under the MWPSC Act, asserting unauthorized occupation of property. The eviction was granted without full consideration of ongoing civil litigation contesting property rights. (Paras 5-8)

Findings of Court:
The Action Plan does not establish lawful authority for eviction, lacking provisions in the Act and Rules designed to protect senior citizens effectively. The eviction violated principles of natural justice, lacking adequate procedures for adjudication of property rights. (Paras 104-120)

Issues: The primary issue was whether the District Magistrate had the authority to order eviction under the Punjab Action Plan, which was found to be beyond the scope of the MWPSC Act. (Paras 1, 116)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined the Action Plan introduced concepts inconsistent with the MWPSC Act's purpose, violating the rule of law and separation of powers, rendering the eviction order invalid. (Paras 104-120)

Result: The petition was allowed and the eviction order was set aside.

JUDGMENTRajiv Narain Raina, J. - Questions of considerable public importance have been raised in this petition which have the potential to affect a large number of cases arising out of 'The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007' (for short 'the MWPSC Act' or 'the Act') in the matter of "eviction" by the Maintenance Tribunals set up under section 7 of the MWPSC Act. The Act provides for more effective provisions for the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens guaranteed and recognised under the Constitution and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

2. The validity of the Punjab Action Plan - 2014 is the centre stage of this case to examine whether it can pass judicial scrutiny tested on several grounds raised by the petitioner which are adverted to below and discussed with the help of precedents and a large number of legal principles addressed to determine the issue/s on a larger canvas which is not judicially travelled before past precedents, as Mr. Anupam Gupta puts it, on the question of eviction and dispossession under the Action Plan, the legal validity of which is challenged on the ground of it being manifestly arbitrary and ultra vires the Act itself and the Rules framed there under as they are inconsistent with the scheme, objects and purposes of the MWPSC Act which was to establish only a Maintenance Tribunal to carry out the purposes of the Act in which eviction was not part of the enacted social policy.

3. The mischief sought to be tackled by parliament due to withering of the joint family system gave birth to the MWPSC Act is contained in the Statement of Objects and Reasons in the Bill. It would be useful to revisit those declarations as the backdrop for the determination of a limited issue raised by the petitioner regarding the validity of the Punjab Action Plan, 2014 notified under the Act and rules introducing the concept of eviction for the first time outside the common law. They are reproduced:-

"Traditional norms and values of the Indian society laid stress on providing care for the elderly. However, due to withering of the joint family system, a large number of elderly are not being looked after by their family. Consequently, many older persons, particularly widowed women are now forced to spend their twilight years all alone and are exposed to emotional neglect and to lack of physical and financial support. This clearly reveals that ageing has become a major social challenge and there is a need to give more attention to the care and protection for the older persons. Though the parents can claim maintenance under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the procedure is both time-consuming as well as expensive. Hence, there is need to have simple, inexpensive and speedy provisions to claim maintenance for parents.

2. The Bill proposes to cast an obligation on the persons who inherit the property of their aged relatives to maintain such aged relatives and also proposes to make provisions for setting up old age homes for providing maintenance to the indigent older persons.

The Bill further proposes to provide better medical facilities to the senior citizens and provisions for protection of their life and property.

3. The Bill, therefore, proposes to provide for:-

(a) appropriate mechanism to be set up to provide need-based maintenance to the parents and senior citizens

(b) providing better medical facilities to senior citizens

(c) for institutionalization of a suitable mechanism for protection of life and property of older persons.

(d) setting up of old age homes in every district.

4. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives."

4. Section 2(b) of the MWPSC Act defines "maintenance" to include provision for food, clothing, residence and medical attendance and treatment. Section 2(f) defines "property" to mean property of any kind, whether movable

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top