AI Overview

AI Overview...

#DivorceCourtFee, #Section13B, #HinduMarriageAct

Court Fee for 13B Hindu Marriage Divorce: Complete Guide


Disclaimer: This blog post provides general information based on legal precedents and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Court fees and procedures can vary by jurisdiction and specific circumstances. Always consult a qualified lawyer for your case.


Divorcing by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA) is often the fastest way for couples to end an irretrievably broken marriage. But one common question arises: What is the court fee for 13B Hindu Marriage petitions? While the search results don't specify exact fee amounts (as these vary by state and court), they highlight procedural aspects, waivers, and Supreme Court guidelines that indirectly touch on filing requirements. This guide breaks it down, drawing from key judgments to help you understand costs, processes, and practical tips.


Understanding Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act


Section 13B allows divorce by mutual consent if both spouses agree the marriage has broken down and file a joint petition. The process involves:
- First motion: Filing the petition with consent affidavits.
- Six-month cooling period: A statutory wait under Section 13B(2) to allow reconciliation chances.
- Second motion: Final hearing after the period, leading to the divorce decree.


Courts have clarified this period is directory, not mandatory, and can be waived in exceptional cases. For instance, The six-month waiting period prescribed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is directory and not mandatory. Padmini VS Hemant Singh - 1993 Supreme(MP) 654


Court Fee Structure for 13B Petitions


Court fees for Section 13B petitions are nominal compared to contested divorces under Section 13 HMA. Typically:
- Fixed low fee: In many family courts, it's a flat amount like Rs. 100-500 for the petition, plus affidavit fees.
- State variations: Under court fee acts (e.g., Court Fees Act, 1870 as amended), family court filings often have concessional rates. One case notes, Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act as a fixed Court fee GARIMA SINGH VS SANJAI SINGH - 1996 Supreme(All) 690, indicating simplified, low-cost filing.
- Additional costs:
- Affidavit notarization: Rs. 50-200.
- Process fees for notices: Minimal.
- Alimony/settlement stamps: If permanent alimony is part of the decree.


Pro tip: Check your state's Family Courts Rules or the district court website for exact fees. For example, in Delhi Family Courts, 13B fees are often under Rs. 200, far lower than contested cases requiring ad valorem fees.


Waiver of Six-Month Period: Saves Time and Indirect Costs


A key feature from judgments is the court's discretion to waive the 6-month wait, reducing overall expenses like repeated court visits. Factors courts consider include:
- Length of separation.
- Failed reconciliation attempts.
- No children or settled custody.
- Mutual consent without coercion.


The court held that the six-month waiting period... is directory and not mandatory. The court has the power to waive the waiting period in exceptional circumstances. Padmini VS Hemant Singh - 1993 Supreme(MP) 654 Courts list criteria: For exercise of discretion to waive statutory waiting period... Court would consider (i) length of time for which parties had been married; (ii) how long parties had stayed together... Amit Kumar VS Suman Beniwal - 2022 1 Supreme 723


In one case, parties married for 15 months, lived together only 3 days, and the Supreme Court waived the period using Article 142 powers: Court deems it appropriate to exercise its power under Article 142... waiving statutory waiting period. Amit Kumar VS Suman Beniwal - 2022 1 Supreme 723


However, not always granted: Direct Supreme Court writs to bypass family courts were dismissed. Writ Petition filed under Article 32... for waiving statutory period of six months... held incomprehensible as to under what circumstances, writ was maintainable. Poonam VS Sumit Tanwar - 2010 2 Supreme 484 POONAM VS SUMIT TANWAR - 2010 Supreme(UK) 117


Special Procedures for NRIs and Virtual Hearings


For NRIs filing 13B petitions, fees remain the same, but procedures adapt:
- Power of Attorney (PoA): Allowed for affidavits. Whether a Power of Attorney holder can be examined as a witness... Family Courts are justified in seeking assistance of any practicing lawyer to provide the necessary facility... using skype technology. Dasam Vijay Rama Rao VS M. Sai Sri - 2015 Supreme(AP) 263 Dasam Vijay Rama Rao VS M. Sai Sri
- Video conferencing: Courts now permit virtual appearances. The court affirmed that parties in divorce proceedings may appear via video conferencing. Ankit Agrawal vs Monika Agrawal - 2025 Supreme(All) 2708


This reduces travel costs, making 13B accessible globally.


Other Costs and Considerations



  • Alimony and Settlements: Often settled via consent terms, with court fees on stamped agreements (e.g., Rs. 100-500 stamp duty).

  • Appeals: If contested, higher fees apply, but mutual consent minimizes this.

  • Fraud Cases: Rare, but courts use inherent powers under CPC Section 151 to set aside decrees, potentially adding costs. A court has inherent powers to correct its own proceedings when it is misled by a fraud. GARIMA SINGH VS SANJAI SINGH - 1996 Supreme(All) 690


| Cost Component | Typical Range (Rs.) | Notes |
|---------------------|-------------------------|-----------|
| Petition Filing Fee | 100-500 | Fixed for 13B; varies by state |
| Affidavits | 50-200 | Notarization per person |
| Notices/Process | 50-100 | Minimal |
| Stamps for Settlement | 100-1000 | If alimony involved |
| Total Estimated | 300-2000 | Excludes lawyer fees |


Key Supreme Court Guidelines on 13B



  • Irretrievable Breakdown: Courts grant divorce even beyond 13B if marriage is dead. Divorce – A dead marriage must be given a decent quietus... Parties to be granted divorce on grounds of irretrievable breakdown. Gudivada Seshagiri Rao VS Gudivada Ashalatha - 2025 3 Supreme 496

  • Appellate Courts: Can directly grant 13B decrees, waiving periods. decree on mutual consent -- can be granted by appellate Court -- time of 6 months gap - not applicable to appellate Court. Mahesh Kumar VS Sunita - 1998 Supreme(MP) 290

  • No Article 32 Bypass: Family court orders enforcing 6 months don't violate fundamental rights. Relief under Article 32 can be for enforcing a right conferred by Part III... Judicial orders... are not amenable to be corrected by issuing a writ under Article 32. Poonam VS Sumit Tanwar - 2010 2 Supreme 484


Practical Steps to File 13B Petition



  1. Draft Joint Petition: Include marriage details, consent, and settlement terms.

  2. Affidavits: Both spouses affirm free consent.

  3. Pay Court Fee: At family court counter.

  4. First Motion Hearing: Court records statements.

  5. Wait or Seek Waiver: File application post-first motion.

  6. Second Motion: Decree issued.


Lawyer Fees: Separate from court fees; Rs. 10,000-50,000 typically for uncontested 13B.


Conclusion and Key Takeaways


Court fees for 13B Hindu Marriage petitions are low and fixed, making mutual consent divorce affordable. Focus on procedural compliance, waiver applications, and using tech for NRIs. While exact fees depend on your court, precedents emphasize efficiency to end dead marriages humanely.


Key Takeaways:
- Fees: Nominal (Rs. 100-500 typically); check local rules.
- Waiver Possible: If no reconciliation chance. Padmini VS Hemant Singh - 1993 Supreme(MP) 654 Amit Kumar VS Suman Beniwal - 2022 1 Supreme 723
- NRIs Welcome: Virtual/PoA options. Dasam Vijay Rama Rao VS M. Sai Sri - 2015 Supreme(AP) 263
- Avoid Shortcuts: No direct Supreme Court bypass. Poonam VS Sumit Tanwar - 2010 2 Supreme 484


For personalized guidance, contact a family law expert. Ending a marriage amicably saves not just money, but emotional trauma.


Last Updated: Based on latest available precedents.

Search Results for "Court Fee for 13B Hindu Marriage Divorce Explained"

State Of Kerala VS N. M. Thomas - 1975 Supreme(SC) 362

1975 0 Supreme(SC) 362 India - Supreme Court

H.R.KHANNA, V.R.KRISHNA IYER, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, A.N.RAY, A.C.GUPTA, K.K.MATHEW, M.H.BEG

REASONABLENESS OF RESTRICTIONS—TESTS AND GUIDELINES LAID DOWN BY SUPREME COURT TO JUDGE REASONABLENESS - CLAIMS OF MEMBERS OF SCHEDULED ... CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED IN MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO SERVICES/POSTS IN CONNECTION WITH STAFF AFFAIRS, CONSISTENT ... Section 11 not to apply in certain cases: (1) (b) Nothing contained in Section 11 or Section 12 shall operate so as to exclude from ... Pra....

Poonam VS Sumit Tanwar - 2010 2 Supreme 484

2010 2 Supreme 484 India - Supreme Court

AFTAB ALAM, B.S.CHAUHAN

Constitution of India,1950- Article 32 - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955- Section 13-B(2)- Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of Constitution ... months provided under Section 13-B(2) of Act of 1955-The citizens are entitled to appropriate relief under provisions of Article ... of the parties and/or issue directions waiving statutory period of six months provided under Section 13-#HL_....

Association for Democratic Reforms VS Union of India - 2024 2 Supreme 342

2024 2 Supreme 342 India - Supreme Court

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJIV KHANNA, B. R. GAVAI, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA

Act (as amended by Section 154 of Finance Act 2017), and Section 13A(b) (as amended by Section 11 of Finance Act 2017) are violative ... People Act, Section 182(3) of Companies Act, 2013, and Section 13A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended by Finance Act, 2017 ... Section 29C(1) of Representation of People Act, 1951 (as....

Mahesh Kumar VS Sunita - 1998 Supreme(MP) 290

1998 0 Supreme(MP) 290 India - Madhya Pradesh

S.B.SAKRIKAR

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 -- S. 13B (2) -- decree on mutual consent -- can be granted by appellate Court -- time of 6 months gap - ... - not applicable to appellate Court -- it is also procedural. ... ... fganw fookg vf/kfu;e] 1955 & /kkjk 13 ... divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'). ... under Section 13B#HL_EN....

Padmini VS Hemant Singh - 1993 Supreme(MP) 654

1993 0 Supreme(MP) 654 India - Madhya Pradesh

A.R.TIWARI

voluntarily agreed to dissolve the marriage. ... Finding of the Court: The court held that the six-month waiting period prescribed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage ... , and had mutually and voluntarily agreed to dissolve the marriage. ... They thus decided to come under the protective umbrella of Section 13B of the Act and aptly took th....

Dasam Vijay Rama Rao VS M.  Sai Sri

India - Current Civil Cases

NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

Solicitors Act, I860 — Section 26 — Family Courts Act, 1984 — Section 13 —Family Courts justified in seeking assistance of any practicing ... Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 13-B — Powers-of-Attorney Act, 1882 — Section 2 — Advocates Act, 1961 — Section 29, 32 & 33 — ... Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 13-B — Powers-of-Attorney Act, 1882 ....

Poonam VS Sumit Tanwar

2010 2 Supreme 484 India - Supreme Court

AFTAB ALAM, B.S.CHAUHAN

annulling marriage of the parties and/or issue directions waiving statutory period of six months provided under Section 13-B(2) of ... months provided under Section 13-B(2) of Act of 1955-The citizens are entitled to appropriate relief under provisions of Article ... Constitution of India,1950- Article 32 - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955- Section 13-B(2)- Writ Petitio....

Subramanian, F/O.  Deceased Geetha VS Mohandas, S/o.  Ittaman - 2020 Supreme(Ker) 258

2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 258 India - Kerala

ANIL K.NARENDRAN

of such power cannot be considered as law laid down by the Apex Court under Article 141 of the Constitution of India. ... On payment of that amount, both parties have agreed to file a joint petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for ... issued by the Apex Court in exercise of its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to do proper justice and the exercise ... Fee and Leg....

Dasam Vijay Rama Rao VS M.  Sai Sri

2015 0 Supreme(AP) 263 India - Andhra Pradesh

NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 13-B – Solicitors Act, I860 – Section 26 – Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 ... – Section 2 – Advocates Act – Section 30 and 32 – Family Courts Act, 1984 – Section 13 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order XIX ... This will enable the litigation costs to be reduced greatly and will also save precious time of the Court. ... "Power of Attorney" includes any instrument (n....

POONAM VS SUMIT TANWAR - 2010 Supreme(UK) 117

2010 0 Supreme(UK) 117 India - Uttarakhand

B.S.CHAUHAN, AFTAB ALAM

(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Sec. 13-B(1) & (2), Constitution of India, 1950, Arts. 32, 142, 12 — Dissolution of marriage — Petition ... — Both parties advised to make further efforts for reconciliation in order to save their marriageIn case they are unable to do ... (Paras 7 to 10, 20) ... (B) Legal Profession — Is different from other ... A petition for dissolution of marriage by consent being HMA No. 197/09 dated 09.09.2009 w....

Kamal VS Varsha - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1277

2021 0 Supreme(Raj) 1277 India - Rajasthan

SANDEEP MEHTA, SAMEER JAIN

Under the traditional Hindu Law, as it stood prior to the statutory law on the point, marriage is a sacrament and cannot be dissolved by consent. The Act enabled the court to dissolve marriage on statutory grounds. ... On 24.08.2021, appellant and respondent filed an application under Section 13B of the H.M.A. Act stating that their marriage was solemnized on 29.04.2016 as per Hindu rites and customs at Udaipur. ... On 23.09.2021, inspite of Section 13B#HL_E....

Ajeesh Anand VS Nil - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 1908

2021 0 Supreme(Raj) 1908 India - Rajasthan

SAMEER JAIN, SANDEEP MEHTA

Under the traditional Hindu Law, as it stood prior to the statutory law on the point, marriage is a sacrament and cannot be dissolved by consent. The Act enabled the court to dissolve marriage on statutory grounds. ... On 02.8.2021, the appellants filed an application under Section 13B of the HMA Act stating that their marriage was solemnized on 11.11.2006 as per Hindu rites and customs at Udaipur and daughter namely Anvesha was born out of their wedlock, who resides ....

SRI N. MURALI KRISHNA Vs MRS.K. NIRMALA - 2020 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 197

2020 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 197 India - High Court of Karnataka

B.V.NAGARATHNA,N S SANJAY GOWDA

this Hon’ble Court seeking to dissolve their marriage dated 16-8-2009 between them. ... > Block, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, as per the Hindu rites, and out the said wedlock there are no issue between the Appellant and Respondent herein as on this date. ... The parties have also filed an application under Section 13B(2) of the Act stating that the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down and there is no possibility of any reconciliation between them. ... WHEREFORE, the Appellant 1....

Medha Aggarwal VS Rajat Singhal - 2024 Supreme(UK) 600

2024 0 Supreme(UK) 600 India - Uttarakhand

RITU BAHRI, RAKESH THAPLIYAL

The marriage of the parties was solemnized on 19.04.2012, at Lake Garden Wedding Point, Near Raja Ram Mohan Rai Academy, Dehradun, as per Hindu rites and rituals. After the marriage the parties got separated in November 2012. ... Consequently, the petition under section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act is allowed. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent is hereby dissolved by a decree of divorce on the conditions agreed between the parties. ... The present appeal under section 19 of the Famil....

Mahesh Kumar VS Sunita

1998 0 Supreme(MP) 290 India - Madhya Pradesh

S.B.SAKRIKAR

I am disposed to hold that timetable fixed by S. 13B (2) does not apply to Appellate Court and imposes no fetters as such." ... ... Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant and respondent are husband arid wife and their marriage was solemnized according to Hindu Customs and rites on 30th May, 1991. ... The judgment and decree of the trial Court is set aside and decree for dissolution of marriage between the parties is passed on the ground of mutual consent under Se....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top