AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Cross-Examination of Insurance Underwriters -
    Main Points & Insights:
  • Underwriters' promises are generally regarded as contracts of indemnity, meaning the insured can only recover to the extent of actual loss, not profit (00200011874).
  • During cross-examination, insurers may challenge claims by probing the validity of the loss, the accuracy of declarations, or the existence of material facts (01200018455, 01200038352).
  • Oral testimony can be used to dispute facts, such as the insured's claims about the condition or existence of goods or the insured's conduct (01300028206).
  • The insurer's right to scrutinize and interpret policy clauses, including conditions and warranties, is critical during cross-examination to establish or refute liability (01200003437, 01100059640).
  • Experts like surveyors' reports are not binding but are examined during cross-examination to assess the validity of the claim (IND_HC_HCGA010009842006).
  • In cases involving non-disclosure or misrepresentation, insurers may question the insured's honesty and knowledge, especially regarding material facts like health conditions or prior claims (01200023449).

  • Key Strategies in Cross-Examination:

  • Challenging the credibility of the insured's statements or evidence.
  • Examining the consistency of declarations with policy terms and factual circumstances.
  • Highlighting discrepancies or suppression of material facts to justify repudiation or denial of claims (01200027149).
  • Using expert testimony to undermine the insured's version or to support insurer's position.

  • Analysis & Conclusion:
    Cross-examining an insurance underwriter involves scrutinizing the contractual obligations, the validity of the claim, and the insured's conduct or disclosures. It aims to establish whether the insurer's denial or repudiation is justified based on policy interpretation, factual accuracy, and material facts. Effective cross-examination can reveal inconsistencies, challenge the credibility of evidence, and clarify the insurer's grounds for denying a claim, ultimately influencing the outcome of insurance disputes.

Search Results for "Cross Examining a Insurance Underwriter"

Regional Manager, Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company, Madras VS Savoy Solvent Oil Extractions Ltd. , Nizamabad

1997 0 Supreme(AP) 1016 India - Andhra Pradesh

NEELAM SANJIVA REDDY, S.PARVATHA RAO

any material to disprove same also states that smaller go down had been completely repaired by time of our second visit on in his cross-examination ... The mortgage Insurance Corporation (1894) 1 queen s Bench 54 at page 61 as follows:"by the law of insurance, though the underwriter directly promises to pay on a certain event, the contract is treated as one of indemnity; and it follows that, if the assured, who has been indemnified by the underwriters ... in order to obtain such salvage, he is bound to ....

Toshnival Sensors Pvt. Ltd.  VS Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

India - Consumer

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 12 r/ws 17 (a)(i) - Complaint under, against repudiation of insurance claim - Complainant ... obtained an insurance cover from the insurer to cover transit risks of an overseas consignment - Cover notes were issued to the ... in respect of the consignment - When the goods reached Bombay, the liability of the insurance company ceased on the basis of the ... He left the office and promised to the complainant to deliver the cover notes to him after preparing them and after counter signature of the #HL_....

DEEPAK INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

India - Consumer

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, BASANTI DEVI, S.KULWANT SINGH

INSURANCE - TRANSIT INSURANCE - REPUDIATION OF CLAIM - INSURANCE ACT, 1938, SECTION 64-VB - INTERPRETATION - INSURANCE POLICY ... Interpretation of Section 64-VB of the Insurance Act, 1938. 3. Interpretation of Clause 8.2 of the insurance policy. 4. ... The court interpreted Section 64-VB of the Insurance Act, 1938, and Clause 8.2 of the insurance policy and held that the insurer ... of the loss and the underwriter was not. ... Mere....

United India Insurance Company Ltd.  VS Kishore L. Tolani

2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 1213 India - Bombay

U.V.BAKRE

... [United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shri Kishore L. ... In terms of clause 9.1.2 and 13.6 of the Insurance Policy which is at Exhibit PW 1/A, the defendant No. 1 is obliged to indemnify ... Policy - Plaintiff has right to sue for specific performance of Insurance Policy which is contract of indemnity - Impugned judgment ... He submitted though no bank guarantee was furnished by the plaintiff, however, by letter dated 4th January 1990 (Exhibit D-2/A), the plaintiff has given this Insurance Guarantee, to settle the bil....

National Insurance Co.  Ltd.  VS National Co-Operative Consumer Federation of India Ltd.

2009 0 Supreme(Del) 1392 India - Delhi

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Insurance - Dispute over loss of goods due to unprecedented rain at Kandla Port - Insurance Policy coverage during transit and ... storage - Sections 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938 - Open Marine Insurance Policy - Declarations and warranties under the policy ... Policy issued by the appellant-Insurance Company. ... the insurance company. ... Clause 2 of this Memorandum attached provides as a condition of the contract that the assured are bound to declare every consignment without exce....

Kavabhai Khemaji Katara VS Akbarbhai Abdul Hamid Kharodia

2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 1041 India - Gujarat

S.G.SHAH

However, when such fact is tried to be proved during oral evidence by cross examining the claimant on behalf of the insurance company, it is clear and certain that the claimant has in categorical terms denied that his son was working in the stone quarry. ... Provided always that:- ... (1) This endorsement does not indemnify that Insured in respect of any liability in cases where the Insured holds or subsequently effects with any Insurance Company or group of Underwriters a policy of Insurance#....

MOHD.  AZAM VS BIRLA SUNLIFE INSURANCE CO.  LTD.

India - Consumer

D.APPA RAO, M.SHREESHA, G.BHOOPATHI REDDY

Insurance Policies - Consumer Protection Act - Sections 12, 16, and 17 - The court discussed various insurance policies taken ... The insurance companies resisted the claims, citing discrepancies and suppression of material facts by the deceased. ... insurance companies resisted the claims, citing discrepancies and suppression of material facts by the deceased. ... It is true that normally the expression underwrite is used in Marine Insurance but the expression used in Chapter III of t....

M/s. United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs Shri Kishore L. Tolani

India - Bombay High Court - Bench at Goa

U. V. BAKRE, J

Insurance Act, 1938 any licensed surveyor can assess the loss but his report is not binding on the Insurance Company. He therefore contended that the report or recommendations of PW2 are not binding on the defendant no. 1. ... By letter dated 03/08/1992, the defendant no. 1 wrote to the plaintiff that that it was examining the claim for 'sue and labour'. Thereafter, the plaintiff gave final notice dated 20/02/1993 to the defendant no.1. By reply dated 4/5/1993, the defendant no. 1 denied the liability. ... According to him, the said quest....

Life Insurance Corporation of India South Zone, Madras VS Bhogadi Chandravathamma

1970 0 Supreme(AP) 53 India - Andhra Pradesh

P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU, S.OBUL REDDY

LIFE INSURANCE - AVOIDANCE OF POLICY - NON-DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL FACT - BURDEN OF PROOF - SECTION 45 OF THE INSURANCE ACT, 1938 ... The cross-objections filed by the respondent, seeking costs, were also dismissed. ... Whether the insured fraudulently suppressed the material fact of his diabetes, thereby avoiding the insurance policies. 2. ... J:"in policies of Insurance. whether marine insurance or life insurance, there is an understanding that the contract is uber....

Patel Shanabhai Darubhai & Co.  VS Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

India - Consumer

R.K.BATTA, VINAY KUMAR

Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Section 21—Marine Insurance Act, 1963— Section 51— Insurance—Loss of cargo—Competent authority repudiated ... entered into High Sea Sale agreement—Objections relating to locus standi of Complainant and relating to his interest in claim of insurance ... rejected—Respondent has not been able to establish with evidence the ground for repudiation of claim—Claim has been repudiated unjustly— Insurance ... He informed the insurance and made a claim under the policy. Ins....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top