AI Overview...
-
Daughter Not Shown on Mutation - The mutation was sanctioned based on a registered Will of late Smt. Maya Devi (19.08.1980), but the plaintiff was not disclosed as her daughter. The court observed that the mutation was not proven to be fraudulent but was not necessarily indicative of the plaintiff's daughter status. Bindo @ Bimla VS Bachan Gir And Others - Punjab and Haryana
-
Mutation Validation and Disputes - Court held that even if a mutation is validated by revenue authorities, it does not preclude further investigation or legal challenge. In a case involving Shingara Singh, mutation was in his favor ignoring the daughter, leading to a dispute. Jagdish Kaur VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana
-
Daughter's Inclusion in Mutation Records - In the case of Bhura’s land, the mutation only listed his four sons, and no mention was made of a daughter. The mutation records did not refer to any daughter, and her inclusion was not supported by the record or the Tehsildar’s report. Farookh VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan
-
Mutation Without Notice and Daughter's Rights - Land was mutated in favor of the mother and her son without notice to all heirs, excluding the daughter. Mutation proceedings do not permit partition, and the absence of her name indicates her exclusion from the mutation process. Ravindra Singh VS Harsh Kumari - Madhya Pradesh
-
Adoption and Mutation Dispute - Petitioner Sharda Devi claimed to be adopted daughter of Ramlal and obtained mutation; however, this was contested as fraudulent. The court considered her claim of adoption and the legitimacy of her mutation entry, highlighting allegations of fraud and the need for further investigation. Sharda Devi VS State of Raj. - Crimes, SHARDA DEVI VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan
-
Mutation and Title Rights - Mutation reflects ownership but does not confer title. In a case involving a daughter’s entitlement, the mutation did not state her as an adopted daughter, and her opportunity to be heard was not provided. The court upheld the original rights of the natural heirs. Hangami VS Sodara - Rajasthan
-
Evidence and Mutation - The court relied on evidence such as mutation records, which showed inheritance and ownership, and noted that unchallenged depositions could be deemed admissions. Delay in challenging mutation was viewed as unjustified, emphasizing the importance of timely legal action. Sheona VS Maro - Punjab and Haryana, Jabar Malik VS State Of J&K - Jammu and Kashmir
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively highlight that mutation entries alone do not establish daughterhood or ownership rights, especially when the daughter is not shown or her inclusion is disputed. The records must be supported by proper notices, hearings, and evidence of relationship or adoption. Fraudulent mutations are subject to legal scrutiny, and courts emphasize that mutation is a record of possession, not title. In cases of dispute regarding daughter's status, the absence of her name in mutation records, lack of notice, or failure to prove adoption can lead to her exclusion from inheritance or property rights.
Search Results for "Daughter Not Shown on Mutation"
2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 3526 • India - Punjab and Haryana
ANIL KSHETARPAL
No doubt, in the mutation, the plaintiff has not been shown to be the daughter of late Smt. Maya Devi but at the same time the mutation has been sanctioned on the basis of registered Will executed by late Smt. Maya Devi dated 19.08.1980. ... Maya Devi was sanctioned on the basis of registered Will dated 19.08.1980, the plaintiff has not been disclosed to be daughter of Maya Devi. Hence, he submits that the mutation dated 24.08.1994 is result of fraud....
2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 958 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RAJAN GUPTA
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the mere validation of the mutation by a revenue authority did not bar the investigating ... Quashing of FIR - Mutation Dispute - IPC 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(1)(3) and ... 11.7.2009, registered against the petitioners under various sections of IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, related to a mutation ... Mutation was sanctioned in favour of Shingara Singh son of Labh Singh ignoring daughter#HL_....
2005 0 Supreme(Raj) 1743 • India - Rajasthan
DINESH MAHESHWARI
However, this fact of impleadment of the daughter of Bhura as party has not been shown to be referable to any particular proceeding in the record. Even the mutation entry on the death of Bhura as effected on 05.03.1970 show that the land was mutated only in the name of the four sons of Bhura. ... Coming to the question of the daughter of Bhura, it is found from the declaration that no such daughter was mentioned at all. The Tehsildar in his report has also not found a....
2024 0 Supreme(MP) 495 • India - Madhya Pradesh
ASHWINI KUMAR RAI, B. R. PATIL
shown in mutation register -- without notice to all interested persons, on basis of noting of mother on mutation register, 70 acres ... of land mutated in name of mother and 30 acres of land mutated in name of her son -- leaving nothing to her daughter -- under section ... 110, all heirs are entitled for mutation -- partition is not permissible in mutation proceeding -- mutation-cum-partition order ... , was not shown#HL_E....
• India - Crimes
R.S.VERMA
Petitioner trying to argue merits of the case that she was the adopted daughter and hence genuinely got the mutation entered Petition ... the mutation entered. ... The petitioner wants me to enter into the merits of the case and give a finding at this stage that the petitioner has been adopted by Ram Lal as a daughter and hence she had genuinely got the mutation entered and had no intention to defraud any body. ... Sharda Devi and her other close relatives taking advantage of the fact that Sharda Devi w....
1994 0 Supreme(Raj) 48 • India - Rajasthan
R.S.VERMA
A complaint was filed alleging that the petitioner, Sharda Devi, fraudulently claimed to be the daughter of Ramlal and got ... a mutation entered to deprive the real heirs of Ramlal from his agricultural land. ... CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - SECTION 482 - QUASHING OF FIR - ADOPTION - FRAUDULENT MUTATION - INHERENT POWERS OF HIGH COURT ... the mutation entered. ... The petitioner wants me to enter into the merits of the case and give a finding at this stage that the petitioner has been adopted by Ram Lal as a #HL_STA....
2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 874 • India - Punjab and Haryana
SURYAKANT, AMOL RATTAN SINGH
The respondents contended that the petitioner's daughter, a student at the time, had also been allotted a flat under the same scheme ... , and the petitioner was not entitled to another dwelling unit due to her ownership. ... Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was not entitled to possession of the dwelling unit. ... ... No doubt, mutation does not confer title but only reflects the same in the record, nevertheless, no `khasra girdwari' has been shown, pro....
2009 0 Supreme(Raj) 979 • India - Rajasthan
A.K.PUROHIT, G.K.TIWARI
decleration of khatedari rights — Trial Court decreed the suit and first appellate Court upheld the same — Respondent plaintiff is daughter ... The mutation does not even state that Kana was an adopted son to Nanda. This mutation was carried out on 16.6.1992 when daughter of Nanda, Sodra was also alive butno opportunity of hearing seems to have been given to Sodra before attesting of the mutation. ... The deceased Nanda had no other successor except his daughter Sodra....
2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 15 • India - Punjab and Haryana
MAHAVIR S.CHAUHAN
(A) Evidence Act, 1872--Admission by conduct--If a witness is not cross-examined in respect of her deposition on a particular fact ... and is not confronted with a plea to the contrary, the fact so stated by the witness is deemed to have been admitted as correct ... Plaintiff has also proved on record copy of mutation No. 634 of 23.03.1987, Exhibit PX, whereby Maro is shown to have inherited property of Giani, alongwith daughters of Giani, named Jiwni, Mehma, Bharto and Patasho daughter#HL_END....
2018 0 Supreme(J&K) 891 • India - Jammu and Kashmir
MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY
It also emphasized that the order of mutation did not bar the aggrieved party from seeking other available remedies. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the delay in challenging the mutation was unjustified and not condonable ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the delay in challenging the mutation was not acceptable, and the adherence to the mandate ... It is also relevant to mention here that when mutation No. 13 was attested, at that time another....
Filter by Legal Phrase
