AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The death of a defendant in a money suit necessitates prompt legal action to substitute heirs or representatives to maintain the suit's validity. Courts consistently stress adherence to procedural rules (Order 22 CPC) to avoid dismissal or delays. Heirs can be held liable under the decree, and their participation is permitted once properly substituted. Proper procedural steps, including timely applications and court permissions, are crucial for the continuation of money suits after a defendant's death.

Search Results for "Death of Defendant in Money Suit"

Life Insurance Corporation of India VS Sosamma Punnan

1991 0 Supreme(Ker) 62 India - Kerala

P.K.SHAMSUDDIN

Fact of the Case: The plaintiff, widow of the insured, filed a suit for realization of money under two insurance policies ... The defendant contended that the policies lapsed due to non-payment of premiums and that the insured had given false answers regarding ... after the insured's death. ... JUDGMENT :- ... Defendant in O.S. No. 504 of 1982 on the file of the Sub Court, Kottayam is the appellant. Suit is for realisation of money under the two Insurance Policies.....

Kamala Adhikary VS Manika Das

2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 847 India - Calcutta

ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY

Fact of the Case: The original plaintiff filed a money suit for recovery of arrear rent, and after the death of the ... defendant, the heirs and legal representatives were substituted as the defendants. ... Substitution - Money Suit - The court set aside the judgment and decree passed by the trial judge due to the failure to substitute ... After the death of the original defendant, his heirs and legal representatives, being the re....

Basudeb Dey VS Swati Dey

2010 0 Supreme(Cal) 1075 India - Calcutta

PRASENJIT MANDAL

After the plaintiff's death, the defendant filed an application under Order 22 Rule 3 of the C.P.C. for substitution of the names ... Fact of the Case: The original plaintiff filed a money suit for damages for malicious prosecution and defamation. ... The learned Trial Judge was directed to take necessary steps in accordance with the law with regard to the suit. ... THIS application is at the instance of the defendant and is directed against the order no.28 dated August 13, 2008 pass....

Mahammad Mahmud Choudhry VS Behary Lal Saha

1929 0 Supreme(Cal) 103 India - Calcutta

After the death of one defendant, his minor sons were substituted as defendants. ... Fact of the Case: The appellants were plaintiffs in a money suit. ... The trial court decreed the suit, but the appellate court remanded the case, citing lack of leave from the Court for the guardian ... The fasts necessary to be set out for the purposes of the present appeal are these: The appellants were the plaintiffs in a suit for money in which there were orig....

Sarat Chandra Sarkar VS Maihar Stone and Lime Co. , Ltd.

1921 0 Supreme(Cal) 329 India - Calcutta

LANCELOT SANDERSON, RICHARDSON

Fact of the Case: The suit was filed to recover a sum of money, and due to the death of the defendant, an application ... 9, emphasizing the requirement for sufficient cause for not applying in time to bring the legal representatives of the deceased defendant ... Issues: The issues revolved around the delay in prosecuting the suit, the discovery of the defendant's death, and the requirement ... But, in my judgment, the death of the defen....

Baljinder Singh VS Gurvinder Kaur

1998 0 Supreme(P&H) 45 India - Punjab and Haryana

SAT PAL

- SUMMARY Fact of the Case: Plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of money against four defendants including Parminder ... ORDER 22 RULE 10-A CPC - CROSS-EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES - ORDER 22 RULE 4 SUB-RULE 3 CPC - EFFECT OF JUDGMENT ON DEATH OF DEFENDANT ... Issues: Whether the LRs of a deceased defendant can cross-examine the plaintiff's witnesses who have already been cross-examined ... Since the relation between deceased Parminder Singh and the learned counsel continued to subsist e....

RAMACHANDRA SAHU VS BHAGABAN SAHU

1962 0 Supreme(Ori) 88 India - Orissa

R.L.NARASIMHAM, DAS

The Defendant contended that the Plaintiff was not a registered money-lender at the time of the loan and that the suit was barred ... Fact of the Case: The Plaintiff, a member of a Hindu undivided family, advanced a loan to the Defendant on a promissory ... The Plaintiff obtained a registration certificate after his father's death. ... . - This is an appeal from the judgment of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Berhampur dismissing the Plaintiff's suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. ....

MARY JOLLY vs STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24100 India - High Court of Kerala

THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J

Fact of the Case: An original petition was filed by an additional defendant in a suit for recovery of money against ... After the husband's death, the petitioner was added as a defendant. ... Legal heirs can be held liable as per the decree's terms even when the original defendant is deceased. ... This original petition is filed by the additional second defendant in O.S.No.65 of 2008 of the Court of learned Munsiff, Kolencherry. That is a suit file....

Juthika Mulick VS Mahendra Yashwantlal

1994 0 Supreme(SC) 1083 India - Supreme Court

M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.MOHAN

still residing rein as monthly tenants- After death rent for suit premises was sent to appellant money order by defendant On his ... refusal accept same defendants have been duly depositing rent for suit premises month by month with Rent Controller –Held, Applicability ... out of Section- In this case clause lease-deed extracted above stipulates that heirs of lessee will have no right to hold after death ... After the death of Lall Behari Mullick, th....

Yerrapapareddy Polaiah VS Yerrapapareddy Ramaniah

2016 0 Supreme(AP) 149 India - Andhra Pradesh

A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

1st defendant have been jointly cultivating the suit lands – Since plaintiff is in need of money to perform marriage of his younger ... After plaintiff has grown up, he used to cultivate said lands along with 1st defendant – After death of Subbamma, the plaintiff and ... year 1998 and it clearly held that 6th defendant, who is subsequent purchaser, might have purchased item Nos. 1 to 3 of the suit ... After the death of Subbamma, the plaintiff and 1s....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top