AI Overview...
-
Deepika Subhash More - Involved in legal cases related to caste scrutiny and affirmative action. Notably, her case is referenced in multiple judgments, including Writ Petition No. 1953/2007, where the court examined her claim and the validity of caste certificates issued to her and her relatives Dattu s/o Namdev Thakur VS State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Department of Tribal Development - Bombay, Monika Sunil Shinde VS State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department - Bombay.
-
Court Judgments and Orders - The Bombay High Court and Full Bench judgments have discussed her case, emphasizing the verification of caste certificates and the legal validity of claims made by her and her relatives. The court's observations often rely on prior rulings, including those in Yogita Sonawane and Shilpa Thakur cases, which deal with caste validity and affirmative action eligibility Monika D/o. Satish Thakur VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
-
Legal Proceedings and Advocacy - Deepika Sheoran, Advocate, appeared in a 2021 case (WP(C)-114/2021) against the Union of India, indicating ongoing legal involvement concerning her caste or related issues IND_Delhi_WP(C)-114_2021.
-
Main Points:
- Deepika Subhash More's case has been significant in legal discussions on caste validity and affirmative action.
- Her case has been cited in various judgments, reflecting judicial scrutiny over caste certificates.
-
The courts have examined her claim in the context of caste verification, with decisions referencing her and her relatives’ certificates and their validity Dattu s/o Namdev Thakur VS State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Department of Tribal Development - Bombay, Monika Sunil Shinde VS State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department - Bombay, Monika D/o. Satish Thakur VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
-
Insights:
- The judiciary emphasizes thorough verification of caste claims to uphold the integrity of affirmative action policies.
-
Cases like Deepika More’s highlight ongoing legal debates about the authenticity of caste certificates and the criteria for eligibility.
-
Conclusion:
- Deepika Subhash More's legal cases exemplify the judicial process involved in caste verification and the importance of accurate documentation for affirmative action benefits. Her case has contributed to jurisprudence on caste validity, with courts scrutinizing the authenticity of caste certificates to ensure lawful and fair implementation of reservation policies Dattu s/o Namdev Thakur VS State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Department of Tribal Development - Bombay, Monika Sunil Shinde VS State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department - Bombay, Monika D/o. Satish Thakur VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay.
References: - Dattu s/o Namdev Thakur VS State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Department of Tribal Development - Bombay - Dinesh Ramesh Thakur VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay - Monika D/o. Satish Thakur VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay - Monika Sunil Shinde VS State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department - Bombay - DEEPIKA SUBHASH MORE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS - Bombay - IND_Delhi_WP(C)-114_2021
Search Results for "Deepika Subhash more"
2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 1719 • India - Bombay
K.U.CHANDIWAL, NARESH H.PATIL
... 24) Mr.Malte, learned Counsel appearing for the Caste Scrutiny Committee has referred to the orders in Writ Petition No.1953/2007 ( Deepika Subhash More Vs.
2012 0 Supreme(Bom) 689 • India - Bombay
B.R.GAVAI, M.T.JOSHI
In the case of "Vaibhavs/o Subhash Thakur v. The State of Maharashtra and others (Writ Petition No. 5940/2008, decided on 9th October, 2009 by a Division Bench of this Court, to which one of us (B.R.
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 666 • India - Bombay
S.V.GANGAPURWALA, A.M.DHAVALE
However, in full Bench judgments in Yogita Sonawane's case (WP No. 6103/2010) decided on 15.09.2016 and Shilpa Thakur's case (2009(3) Mh.L.J. 995) (and also in Deepika Subhash More v/s.
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1139 • India - Bombay
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, BHARATI H.DANGRE
While making the said observations, the court has placed reliance on the judgment of this court in the case of Deepika Subhash More vs. ... Thereafter, her real uncle Subhash Shinde, cousin uncle Chandrakant Shinde and another cousin uncle Ramdas Shinde, cousin brother Prasad Shinde and recently, Akash Shinde, the another cousin brother are the recipients of the certificates of validity. ... ... Almost similar view is also taken by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in order dated 22.3.2007 in Writ Petition No. 1953/2007, Dipika Subhash....
• India - Bombay High Court - Appellate Side,Bombay
Subhash More ..Petitioner Versus WRIT PETITION NO.1953 OF 2007 Deepika
• India - Appellate Side,Bombay
• India - Bombay High Court
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2842 • India - Bombay
R.M.SAVANT, K.K.SONAWANE
2014 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 4781 • India - High Court of Delhi
• India - Delhi High Court
(C) 114/2021 & CM APPL.342 /2021 EX CPL SUBHASH CHANDER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Baljeet Singh, Advocate with Ms. Deepika Sheoran, Advocate. ... Deepika Sheoran, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate with Mr.
Filter by Legal Phrase
