In the realm of corporate governance, shareholders' meetings play a pivotal role in decision-making. Two primary types—Annual General Meeting (AGM) and Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM)—serve distinct purposes under Indian company law. If you're wondering about the difference between AGM and EGM, this post breaks it down with insights from landmark judgments, statutory provisions, and practical implications. Whether you're a director, shareholder, or business owner, grasping these distinctions ensures compliance and protects stakeholder interests.
Note: This article provides general information based on legal precedents and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for specific situations.
An AGM is a mandatory annual gathering of shareholders, typically held within six months from the end of the financial year, as per Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013 (earlier Section 166 of the 1956 Act). It focuses on routine statutory obligations.
Courts emphasize AGM's obligatory nature. In one case, a civil court compelled a company to hold its overdue 64th AGM within 10 weeks, ruling that companies lack suo motu authority to convene beyond prescribed periods, but courts can enforce it. Sadhan Kumar Ghosh VS Bengal Brick Field Owners' Association - 2010 Supreme(Cal) 908
The requirement of holding an AGM is an obligation or a duty cast on the company by the governing statute and not a right. Sadhan Kumar Ghosh VS Bengal Brick Field Owners' Association - 2010 Supreme(Cal) 908
Non-compliance can dissolve the board automatically, as seen under the Assam Co-operative Societies Act. BAKTAR HUSSAIN vs THE STATE OF ASSAM - 2019 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 410
An EGM, also called a Special General Meeting, is convened for urgent matters outside the regular AGM cycle. It can be called by the board, directors, or shareholders under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Section 169 of the 1956 Act).
Unlike AGMs, EGMs handle ad-hoc matters. However, notices must not be misleading, and resolutions ultra vires can be challenged. Biswanath Prasad Khaitan VS New Central Jute Mills Co Ltd - 1960 Supreme(Cal) 139
| Aspect | AGM | EGM |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Frequency | Annual, mandatory within 6 months post-FY| As required, no fixed schedule |
| Purpose | Routine: accounts, directors, dividends | Urgent/special: removals, amendments |
| Convening Authority | Company/board, enforceable by court/tribunal | Shareholders requisition, board, or court |
| Court Powers | Can compel overdue AGMs (not suo motu) | Direct EGM under Sec 186/98 |
| Consequences of Non-Holding | Board dissolution possible BAKTAR HUSSAIN vs THE STATE OF ASSAM - 2019 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 410 | No automatic penalties, but resolutions challengeable |
The court's jurisdiction to call meetings... is limited to extraordinary general meetings and does not extend to annual general meetings. IN RE: THE PASARI FLOUR MILLS LTD. VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH - 1960 Supreme(MP) 344
This table highlights why confusing the two can lead to legal pitfalls. Tribunals like NCLT wield powers under Section 97 for AGMs and Section 98 for others, ousting civil court jurisdiction in many cases. Selvarathnam VS Standard Fire Words Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Director Mr. P. Jaisankar - 2017 Supreme(Mad) 2732
Indian courts have clarified these distinctions through precedents:
There is no express or implied bar on a Civil Court... to compel the company to discharge the statutory obligation of holding its AGM. Sadhan Kumar Ghosh VS Bengal Brick Field Owners' Association - 2010 Supreme(Cal) 908
Post-2013 Act, NCLT handles most disputes (Secs 97-100, 241-242). Civil suits may be barred under Section 430 if Tribunal-empowered. Selvarathnam VS Standard Fire Words Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Director Mr. P. Jaisankar - 2017 Supreme(Mad) 2732 A suit challenging EGM notice as illegal was redirected to Tribunal.
Understanding the difference between AGM and EGM prevents governance lapses. For tailored advice, engage a corporate lawyer. Stay compliant!
III AND DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY CONTAINED IN PART IV WHICH ARE DECLARED BY ARTICLE #& TO BE FUNDAMENTAL TO GOVERNANCE ... It is nothing but the Government operating behind a corporate veil, carrying out a governmental activity and governmental functions ... of an instrumentality or agency of the State. ... 30, 1972, and further raised to rupees twenty crores by a special resolution passed at the Annual General #HL_START....
Between two private parties the right to take any such decision is absolute and untrammelled by any constraints whatsoever. ... 31 and 32 of the tender document. ... may have committed acts of omission and commission or frauds including misrepresentations, falsification of records and other breaches ... antitrust statutes, including those proscribing price fixing between competitors, allocation of customers #HL_STA....
of 1st petitioner on the premise that no concluded contract was reached between the parties—Order of the Board terminating the contract ... Bank of Travancore and agreed to abide by the terms and conditions of offer in response to a draft letter of intent—Writ petition ... Singh and H.K. Sema, JJ.) ... While doing so the courts did not lose sight of the difference between the Sta....
application was filed with a prayer to the effect that Annual General Meeting be conducted under the Chairmanship of a retired Supreme ... one dayers’ which were to be played between South Africa and India and one day cricket between India and Pakistan. ... It inter alia enjoys benefits by way of tax exemption and right to use stadia at nominal annual rent. ... only to ....
INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IS #19;OTHER AUTHORITY#20; WITHIN MEANING OF ARTICLE 12. ... accounts of the Society along with the auditors report there shall be placed before the Society at the Annual General Meeting and ... were put in the revised scale of Rs. 1100-1606 both having the designation of Professor and there is no appreciable difference in ... And let it be....
The principal challenge was to an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) of the company held on August 18, 2007, and an AGM of the company ... BENGAL BRICK FIELD OWNERS' ASSOCIATION CASE - COMPANIES ACT, 1956 - ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING - AUTHORITY OF COMPANY TO HOLD AGM ... Meeting (AGM) of the Association on July 21, 2008. ... BY ....
COMPANIES ACT - SECTIONS 166, 167, 173, 186, 210, 224, 255, 256 - ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING - EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING - APPOINTMENT ... election at an annual general meeting. ... was an election at an annual general meeting. ... In the case of an extraordinary general meeting all business, irrespective #HL....
that an annual general meeting (AGM) held on August 31, 2007, and the decisions taken therein were illegal, void, and not binding ... ACTION - A suit challenging a resolution passed in an annual general meeting of a company as ultra vires and illegal can be maintained ... The plaintiff also sought a declaration that a proposed extraordinary general meeting was illegal and an injunction restraining....
(A) Companies Act, 2013 - Section 97 - Company petition for convening Annual General Meeting (AGM) - The petitioner sought directions ... to hold AGM due to internal differences among shareholders - Tribunal ordered the AGM to be called and determined that present shareholders ... constitute quorum - Tribunal required due procedure for AGM calling to be followed. ... difference among the #HL_START....
Whether the notice of the extraordinary general meeting was misleading?Ratio Decidendi: 1. ... COMPANY LAW - DIVIDEND - DECLARATION - EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING - POWER - ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION - INTERPRETATION - COMPANIES ... Additionally, the court found that the notice of the extraordinary general meeting was misleading as it did not disclose the facts ... of#HL_....
In so far as the matter relating to EGM or AGM is concerned, the statue prescribes procedures under Sections 96 to 100 of the Act. ... The plaint averment is that the defendants are attempting to capture the management by calling for EGM in violation of Section 100 of the Act and hence, to declare the EGM notice illegal and injunction restraining the defendants from convening AGM of the plaintiff company. ... There is a mandate prescribed under the statute that AGM should be conducted ....
2.5 The Petitioner filed an interim Application, CM 33552/2023 seeking a restraint against the Respondent No.1/EFI from conducting the AGM on 09.07.2023 [hereinafter, called "AGM of 09.07.2023"] during the pendency has been issued unilaterally by Col. ... 12.1 It is further directed that the minutes of EGM shall be drawn up and filed by Respondent No.1/EFI within 10 days of the EGM. 13. ... 2.6 A Coordinate Bench of this Court directed that the AGM be held as scheduled on 09.07.2023. ... (v)....
AGM. ... BY a notice of July 23, 2007 an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) of the company was convened to be held on August 18, 2007 for amending the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the company. The primary grievance of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff received no notice of the EGM. ... They suggest that the present action has been brought a few days before the AGM for the year ended March 31, 2007 had been convened to be held on July 21, 2008 with a false charge of the plaintiff having been kept in the da....
AGM. ... The primary grievance of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff received no notice of the EGM. ... They suggest that the present action has been brought a few days before the AGM for the year ended March 31, 2007 had been convened to be held on July 21, 2008 with a false charge of the plaintiff having been kept in the dark in the matter of the EGM and the amendments proposed and passed thereat. ... The contesting defendants say that notices for the EGM were duly issued to all members and the #HL_S....
Any shareholders meeting requires 5 (five) members to be physically present to constitute quorum at any AGM or EGM. ... Counsel for the respondents would contend that, this Tribunal, in its orders dated 26.10.2017 inter alia, directed the Respondents in CP.No. 50/HDB/2016 to convene and conduct EGM within 60 days from the date of the order (i.e., 26.10.2017) but no EGM nor any AGM were convened and conducted so far even ... This Tribunal, in its orders dated 26.10.2017 inter alia, directed the Responde....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.