AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Redrawing of Select List - Main Points and Insights
  • Orders were issued to revise select lists by excluding ineligible candidates, with references to legal decisions and court orders (00300028953). The KAT directed publication of a merit list after staying earlier orders, ensuring that working candidates' positions remain undisturbed State of Karnataka VS S. D. Shashidara - Karnataka.
  • Appointment processes based on select lists are considered fortuitous and do not confer inherent rights; courts have directed that ineligible candidates, especially those who became eligible later, be excluded from the list Mahendra Pal VS State of U. P. , Thru Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Edu. - Allahabad.
  • Judicial validation of actions taken under previous laws is permissible, with oversight committees and statutory provisions providing protections and review mechanisms, especially concerning biometric and administrative decisions Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd. ) VS Union of India - Supreme Court.
  • Courts emphasize that legislative policy and statutory interpretation are paramount, and judicial intervention in redrawing statutory provisions is limited; courts cannot replace policy judgments with their own, especially in areas like classification of goods for depreciation or tax purposes M/S.LG ELECTRONICS INDIA PVT. vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU - Madras.
  • Disqualification of candidates, such as legal practitioners or municipality officials, is upheld through judicial orders and legal provisions, affirming the authority of courts to reverse or uphold such disqualifications based on legal criteria M/S.LG ELECTRONICS INDIA PVT vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU - Madras.

  • Analysis and Conclusion

  • The overarching principle from these sources indicates that the redrawing or revision of select lists involves judicial oversight primarily to ensure legality and fairness, rather than substituting policy judgments.
  • Ineligible candidates must be excluded from lists, especially when courts have stayed or overturned previous orders or when statutory provisions specify disqualifications.
  • Courts uphold the authority of legislative and administrative bodies to validate actions and make policy-based classifications, limiting judicial overreach in policy formulation.
  • Overall, the process of redrawing select lists should follow legal procedures, respect court orders, and adhere to statutory criteria to ensure fairness and legality in candidate selection.

Search Results for "Direction for Redrawing of Select List by Removing Ineligible Candidates"

State of Karnataka VS S. D.  Shashidara

2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 133 India - Karnataka

S.ABDUL NAZEER, H.S.KEMPANNA

orders were issued including those with weightage subject to decisions of KAT, High Court and Supreme Court with an undertaking from candidates ... working on their posts will not be disturbed - Division Bench stayed the order of single Judge - KAT directed publication of merit list ... The Director General and Inspector General of Police therefore issued a notification dated 5.7.2003 publishing the revised select list by redrawing the select list excluding the rural ....

Mahendra Pal VS State of U. P. , Thru Addl.  Chief Secy.  Deptt.  of Basic Edu.

2023 0 Supreme(All) 337 India - Allahabad

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

as has been directed and who had been appointed as per select list was purely fortuitous and does not entail any right in them - ... Direction is in conformity to the interim order - Court while issuing notice to affected persons directed that, in the meantime, ... ineligible for appointment on last date for submission of application and who became eligible for appointment thereafter, to participate ... forming part of the 6800 candidates as per the select list of 05.....

Justice K. S.  Puttaswamy (Retd. ) VS Union of India

2018 7 Supreme 129 India - Supreme Court

DIPAK MISRA, A. M. KHANWILKAR, ASHOK BHUSHAN, A. K. SIKRI, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD

person concerned – Sufficient protection – Section 33(2) – Order passed under – Subject to review by Oversight Committee – Such direction ... , it validates actions taken under a previous enactment – Legislature has the power to validate actions under an earlier law by removing ... UIDAI is also provided wide powers in relation to removing the biometric locking of residents. ... Section 5(3) provided that on ceasing to hold office, the Lokayukta or Up-Lokayukta shall be ineligible for further appointment. ... Between Jul....

M/S.LG ELECTRONICS INDIA PVT. vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU

2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 21234 India - High Court of Madras

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

The Estate Duty Act, no doubt since repealed, Wealth Tax Act and Gift Tax Act are all measures in the same direction. ... But abstract doctrine cannot be a ground for the Court to undertake the task of redrawing the text or context of a statutory provision. This is clearly an area of law where judicial interpretation cannot be ahead of policy-making. ... What is found in this case is that Parliament has the freedom to select and classify goods for purposes of different rates of depreciation based on certain criteria. ... It is open to the....

M/S.LG ELECTRONICS INDIA PVT vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU

India - Madras High Court

The High Court has in fact made reversed the order of the High Court whereby the ground for the Court to undertake the task of municipality and those legal practitioners are disqualified from standing as candidates ... II and Entry 47 of List III.

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top