DNA Profile Match on Underwear - Several sources indicate that DNA analysis of semen found on the victim's underwear was used as key evidence. In some cases, the DNA profile from semen on underwear matched the accused's DNA (e.g., 01800028956, 01800027024), supporting the prosecution's case. Conversely, other reports found no match; for instance, 01100061192 and 02300052458 noted that DNA profiles from semen did not match the accused's DNA, casting doubt on the evidence. 01800028956, 01800027024, 01100061192, 02300052458
Reliability and Admissibility of DNA Evidence - The credibility of DNA evidence varies across sources. Some reports, like 01400035248, affirm that DNA evidence linked the accused to the crime, supporting conviction. Others, such as 01100058428 and 00100082432, highlight issues with reliability, admissibility, or scientific sufficiency, leading to doubts or acquittals. For example, 00100082432 states that DNA evidence was ultimately found insufficient, resulting in acquittal. 01400035248, 01100058428, 00100082432
Discrepancies and Challenges in DNA Evidence - Several sources mention discrepancies or procedural issues. For example, 01100058428 questions the reliability of the DNA fingerprint report, citing unexplained rapid profile generation. 02300058417 reports that DNA profiles from underwear and pyjami did not match the accused, undermining prosecution efforts. These inconsistencies highlight challenges in forensic analysis and interpretation. 01100058428, 02300058417
Corroboration with Other Evidence - DNA evidence is often corroborated with medical or circumstantial evidence. In 01400035248, DNA matched semen samples supported witness testimony. Conversely, in 01100049779, DNA evidence was part of circumstantial proof leading to conviction. The strength of DNA evidence depends on its consistency with other evidence types. 01400035248, 01100049779
Summary: The use of DNA profiling from underwear as evidence is pivotal but contentious. When DNA from semen on underwear matches the accused, it supports conviction; when it does not, or when the evidence is deemed unreliable, it can lead to doubts or acquittals. The credibility of such evidence depends on proper collection, testing procedures, and corroboration with other evidence.
The doctor has taken into possession the underwear and pyjami of the prosecutrix. But, the DNA profile of source of pyjami and underwear of the prosecutrix did not match with the DNA profile of accused Ved Parkash. So, this effort of the prosecution to create evidence has also gone futile. ... The doctor took possession her underwear, pyjami, swabs and pubic hairs vide memo Ex.P6. On the next day, police came to her house and on her demarcation, prep....
The DNA evidence linked the appellant to the crime, supporting the conviction. ... minor discrepancies do not undermine the overall credibility of a witness, especially when corroborated by medical evidence and DNA ... The two blood samples were sent to the Forensics Science Laboratory (FSL) for DNA profiling and to match it with the DNA profile of the semen in the victim's underwear. It was found that the DNA profile of the semen i....
No, the DNA fingerprint report was not reliable and admissible as evidence. ... Whether the DNA fingerprint report was reliable and admissible as evidence? 3. ... The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence, including the last seen evidence, medical evidence, and DNA fingerprint ... How, within less than a month thereafter, the same FSL was able to generate a DNA profile that could match the DNA profile of A-2 is unexplained. ... PW-2....
Of these two DNA profiles; the DNA profile pertaining to a male individual Showed complete match with the autosomal STR DNA profile obtained from Exhibit-11 (blood on FTA, Vicky Kumar Takia), while the other Partial DNA profile pertaining to a female individual showed match at 16 loci with the autosomal ... Two autosomal STR DNA profiles, pertaining to a male individual and a fem....
The scientific evidence, including DNA findings, was found insufficient and problematic, ultimately leading to the acquittal. ... Crucially, the profile of the DNA extracted from these exhibits was an exact match with the DNA profile obtained from the blood sample of accused-appellant No.1-Akhtar Ali, conclusively proving his physical involvement in the crime. ... (iii) Scientific Evidence (including DNA and FSL Reports), i.e., to say that the scientific analysis of ....
FSL 2013/DNA-8323, DNA No. 1411/13, dated 15.05.2014, suggested that the DNA profile generated from the semen found on the underwear of the prosecutrix did not match the DNA profile generated from the blood sample of the accused. ... CW-1/A was generated, semen was found on the underwear of the prosecutrix. However, the male profile of the DNA generated from the semen on the underwear#HL....
The samples obtained from the underwear of the victim and piece of cloth recovered from the car completely matched with the DNA profile obtained from Avinash. Similarly, the samples collected from the seat cover wholly matched with the DNA profile of Anil Kumar, the bail petitioner. ... j) The Forensic Science Laboratory also conducted a test to match the DNA Profile of samples taken from the accused with the semen recovered from victim and seat c....
Finding of the Court: The court found the appellant guilty based on the DNA report, which showed a match between the ... arguments against the DNA analysis. ... with his minor daughter based on DNA evidence. ... as were lifted from the person of Ujjala or her underwear to DNA analysis, if the micro slide from the vaginal slide and vaginal swab yielded DNA and it matched with that of Pappu, save and except Ex.1g because it was the rectal swab and if human semen match....
C., 1973 -- S. 313 -- DNA profile generated from blood sample and clothes of accused Satish recovered at his behest -- consistent ... The DNA profile generated from the slides of deceased matched with DNA profile generated from the blood sample of Satish, blood stained dhoti , underwear recovered at his behest. ... However, the DNA profile of accused Bhagwani did not match with the DNA p....
It is also submitted that place of occurrence was pathway where commission of such an offence was not possible in the day time at 12.00 noon and as per Section 53-A of the Cr.P.C., it was incumbent upon the prosecution to match DNA profile of the semen of appellant with that of the victim. ... He further submits that underwear of the appellant was also sent for forensic test but, as per the report Ex.PJ, human semen was not detected on his underwear. ... Moreover, as per report from the Forensic Science....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.