AI Overview...
- Effect of Remand Orders - Generally, remanding a case involves returning it to a lower authority or court for reconsideration, often due to procedural issues, insufficient findings, or new evidence. Courts emphasize that remand orders aim to ensure proper evaluation of evidence, correct legal errors, or clarify factual findings. For example, in RAUNAQ ALI VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad, the order was quashed and the matter remanded because the appellate authority failed to consider oral evidence and legal changes; the remand aimed to secure a proper factual and legal determination. Similarly, in Rangasami Naidu VS Virasami Chetti - Madras, the case was remanded for disposal after legal considerations and law came into effect post-purchase, highlighting the importance of legal context in remand decisions.
- Clarification of Findings and Evidence - Courts often remand cases when the initial findings are inconsistent with evidence or lack clarity. For instance, in Baleswar Rangpi VS Bahar Ali (Md. ) - Gauhati, the matter was remanded due to lack of exercise in assessing the extent of disability, requiring expert input. In Didar Singh VS Joint Director Panchayat - Punjab and Haryana, the court remanded to determine the effect of revenue records on ownership, emphasizing the necessity for clear, evidence-based findings.
- Legal and Procedural Errors - Remand is also used when orders are based on material not properly considered or when jurisdictional errors are identified. As in Nityanand Chaudhary VS Braj Kishore Chaudhary - Patna, the order was set aside and remanded due to jurisdictional errors and improper findings regarding minors’ signatures. In RAVINDRA VS LAND TRIBUNAL, ATHANI, BELGAUM DISTRICT - Karnataka, the order was remanded because it was not based on the material before the court.
- Specific Contexts of Remand - Cases involving title, possession, or legal rights often require detailed factual findings, prompting remands. For example, in Ganta Bangarigadu VS Paltheru Atchutaramayya - Madras, the case was remanded to establish adverse possession, and in Sarvesh Kumar Shukla VS Distt. & Sessions Judge Kanpur - Allahabad, orders were remanded for considering the effect of documents and legal consequences.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Remanding a case serves as a procedural tool to rectify legal or factual deficiencies, ensure thorough evaluation of evidence, and uphold procedural fairness. Courts use remand orders to secure accurate, comprehensive findings, especially when initial judgments lack clarity, evidence consideration, or involve legal errors. The main insight is that remand signifies a court’s recognition of incomplete or flawed determinations, emphasizing the importance of proper factual and legal analysis before final judgment.
References: - RAUNAQ ALI VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad
- Rangasami Naidu VS Virasami Chetti - Madras
- Baleswar Rangpi VS Bahar Ali (Md. ) - Gauhati
- Nityanand Chaudhary VS Braj Kishore Chaudhary - Patna
- Didar Singh VS Joint Director Panchayat - Punjab and Haryana
- Sudhakar Laxman Shewale VS Madhukar Laxman Shewale - Bombay
- Sarvesh Kumar Shukla VS Distt. & Sessions Judge Kanpur - Allahabad
- RAVINDRA VS LAND TRIBUNAL, ATHANI, BELGAUM DISTRICT - Karnataka
- Ganta Bangarigadu VS Paltheru Atchutaramayya - Madras
- K. Doraiswami Chetty VS The Official Assignee Of Madras - Madras
Search Results for "Effect of the Finding in the Order of Remanded"
2007 0 Supreme(All) 2913 • India - Allahabad
SHISHIR KUMAR
to that effect was not recorded by it regarding bona fide purchase of land, impugned order quashed and set aside—Matter remanded ... to Appellate Authority—Which partly affirmed order of Prescribed Authority—But remanded matter for decision by Prescribed Authority ... appeal, due to change of law without considering evidence—Held, as Appellate Authority has not considered oral evidence, and a finding ... If no such finding is recorded the judgment passed by the Appell....
1895 0 Supreme(Mad) 67 • India - Madras
SHEPHARD, BEST
Finding of the Court: The court reversed the order of the Judge and remanded the matter for disposal. ... The Act V of 1894 came into effect before the purchase was made, and there was no purchaser in existence at that time. ... In our opinion there is in this case no question of a retrospective effect being given to a new provision of law. When the Act V of 1894 came into effect there was no purchaser in existence. The new law was passed before the purchase was made and the purchas....
2017 0 Supreme(Gau) 1400 • India - Gauhati
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
person without undergoing exercise to determine extent and intensity of disability is unsustainable and Accordingly this matter is remanded ... Government which would consist of at least one expert in field of physical disability as claimed by petitioner and on matter being remanded ... and interim order passed earlier stands vacated - Writ petition dismissed ... Accordingly, by the judgment and order dated 14.03.1997, the learned Board of Revenue remanded back the matter to the Deputy Commissioner, Ka....
2017 0 Supreme(Pat) 806 • India - Patna
MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
below recorded finding that signatures are not signatures of minors but what will be effect of fact that their father, mother and ... suffers from jurisdictional error – Impugned order set aside and matter remanded to Munsif for passing a fresh order. ... court that wrongly it is mentioned that petition to grant leave to compromise was placed on behalf of all minors – Nowhere any finding ... From perusal of the impugned order, it becomes clear that the court below rec....
2002 0 Supreme(P&H) 1190 • India - Punjab and Haryana
SWATANTER KUMAR
The court emphasized the need for a clear finding based on documentary evidence and the determination of the effect of revenue records ... The matter was remanded for a proper determination of the ownership. ... the effect of revenue records on the question of title. ... The Appellate Authority ought to have determined what is the effect of the revenue records which have been produced on record on the question of title. ... Question of title/ownership is a serious question and is a finding#HL_....
2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1095 • India - Bombay
SANDEEP K.SHINDE
Issues: Consistency of finding with evidence, substantial effect on plaintiff's rights Ratio Decidendi: The finding ... Erroneous judgments can be quashed and set aside, and the case can be remanded for a fresh trial under Order 41 Rule 21A of the Code ... Finding of Fact - Joint Family Property - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 41 Rule 21A Fact of the Case: Plaintiff ... That once, the finding is recorded that the impugned judgment and #HL_S....
2013 0 Supreme(All) 3194 • India - Allahabad
SUDHIR AGARWAL
Finding of the Court: The court found that the authorities below had not considered the effect and consequence of the ... The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. ... As a result, the impugned orders were quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. ... Matter is remanded to Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Kanpur to consider the matter afresh and after considering relevant documents, pass a fresh order in accordance wit....
2006 0 Supreme(Kar) 396 • India - Karnataka
V.JAGANNATHAN
on the same - Hence, order is not based on material placed before it - Matter remanded. ... on the same - Hence, order is not based on material placed before it - Matter remanded. ... Jagannathan, J]: Having borne in mind the submissions made to the above effect and on a careful perusal of the impugned order, what ... Yet, it has not chosen to give its finding as to whether the signatures in the Entries 6613 and 6614 are forged or not. ... The writ petition is, theref....
1940 0 Supreme(Mad) 461 • India - Madras
ALFRED HENRY LIONEL LEACH
Finding of the Court: The court found that the first respondent was entitled to possession of the land based on the ... As the result, the case was remanded to the Subordinate Court for a finding as to whether the appellants had been in adverse possession of the property for twelve years. ... His appeal was heard by King, J, who decided that the second respondent, as the landholder, should be made a party to the suit and passed an order to this effect. ... This decision is binding on....
1926 0 Supreme(Mad) 65 • India - Madras
The court held that the debtor, who knew about the adjudication, must be taken as a person who had in effect had service of the order ... The case was ordered to be remanded and dealt with on the merits. ... Final Decision: The case was remanded and to be dealt with on the merits. ... Had it been so intended words such as "or after the order had been brought to his knowledge" after service of the order" could easily have been added, and no such words are found. We therefore ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
