Corroboration Requirement - Courts emphasize that the evidence of an approver (a person who admits to involvement in a crime in exchange for pardon) must be corroborated by independent evidence to be deemed reliable and valid for conviction (Paras 8, 9 State Rep. by Inspector of Police vs G. Senthilkumar - Madras; 01400018790 Rakesh Kumar Singh VS State of Assam - Gauhati; 02300051891 Lachhi Ram VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana; 00100012938 Lachhi Ram VS State Of Punjab - Supreme Court; 00900019090 BIRENDRA NATH SHARMA VS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ACU- II, NEW DELHI - Calcutta).
Reliability and Inherent Probabilities - The approver's testimony should not contain inherent improbabilities or falsehoods. The court assesses whether the approver's evidence is consistent, credible, and free from improbability (02300051891 Lachhi Ram VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana; 00100012938 Lachhi Ram VS State Of Punjab - Supreme Court).
Corroboration on Material Particulars - Evidence from approvers must be corroborated on significant details of the case. Courts scrutinize whether the evidence aligns with other independent evidence to prevent reliance solely on approver testimony (01400018790 Rakesh Kumar Singh VS State of Assam - Gauhati; 02300051891 Lachhi Ram VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana).
Legal Validity of Proceedings and Pardon - The admissibility of approver evidence depends on lawful proceedings, including proper granting of pardon and adherence to legal procedures. Any irregularity in proceedings may affect the validity of the evidence (01500029671 Kilimanni Abu VS State of Kerala - Kerala; 02300020048 State VS Hans Raj - Punjab and Haryana).
Influence of Psychiatric Factors - Courts have considered whether psychiatric influences or factors affect the credibility of approver testimony. When such influences are established, courts may view the evidence with caution, requiring corroboration (IND_HC_KLHC010112732004 PRAKASH @ AJAYAN, S/O.CHAKRAPANI C.8264 Vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala).
Legal Precedents - Courts generally hold that the evidence of an approver alone cannot be the sole basis for conviction unless corroborated, especially given the potential for false testimony or undue influence (00900019090 BIRENDRA NATH SHARMA VS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ACU- II, NEW DELHI - Calcutta; 01400018790 Rakesh Kumar Singh VS State of Assam - Gauhati).
The validity of approver evidence hinges on proper legal procedures, the absence of improbabilities, and corroboration by independent evidence. While approver testimony can be a significant piece of evidence, courts exercise caution, requiring corroboration to mitigate risks of false or unreliable statements. The courts also scrutinize the circumstances under which the pardon was granted and whether the approver's testimony was influenced by external factors, including psychiatric conditions. Overall, approver evidence is admissible and valid when supported by independent evidence and obtained through lawful proceedings, but it cannot be solely relied upon for conviction without corroboration.
References: - Paras 8, 9 State Rep. by Inspector of Police vs G. Senthilkumar - Madras - Kilimanni Abu VS State of Kerala - Kerala - BIRENDRA NATH SHARMA VS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ACU- II, NEW DELHI - Calcutta - Lachhi Ram VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana - Lachhi Ram VS State Of Punjab - Supreme Court - State VS Hans Raj - Punjab and Haryana - Rakesh Kumar Singh VS State of Assam - Gauhati - Abdul Majid VS Emperor - Calcutta - THADIYANTEVIDA NAZEER @ UMMER HAJI @ HAJI,SIDHIQUE, NASER vs STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, NEW DELHI - Kerala - PRAKASH @ AJAYAN, S/O.CHAKRAPANI C.8264 Vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala
(Paras 8, 9) ... ... (C) Admission of approver evidence - Validity when corroborated by independent ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The appeal found the trial court's judgment to be perverse, underscoring the overwhelming evidence ... ... ... Issues: Main issues addressed included the sufficiency of evidence against the accused, the quality of the trial court's ... The prosecution proved the charge against the A1, A4 and A5 under section 468 of I.P.C. through the evidence of ....
of evidence and the validity of proceedings granting pardon to the approver. ... The court also addressed objections regarding the admissibility of evidence and the validity of proceedings granting pardon to the ... The court also addressed objections related to the admissibility of evidence and the validity of proceedings granting pardon to the ... Before I take up the evidence of the approver it may be convenient at this stage to ....
OF STATEMENT OF ACCUSED - EVIDENCE OF ACCOMPLICE OR APPROVER - CORROBORATION - SUMMARY DISMISSAL OF REVISIONAL APPLICATION. ... Whether the evidence of an accomplice or approver can be the base for the conviction of any accused? Ratio Decidendi: 1. ... The court further observed that the evidence of an accomplice or approver could not be the base for the conviction of any accused ... The prosecution case will not depend upon the evidence of approver ....
- CONVICTION BASED ON APPROVER'S EVIDENCE - VALIDITY. ... CRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE - APPROVER - CORROBORATION - TEST - RELIABILITY OF APPROVER'S EVIDENCE - CORROBORATION ON MATERIAL PARTICULARS ... of an approver. ... The test obviously means that the Court should find that there is nothing inherent or improbable in the evidence given by the approver, and that there is no finding that the approver has given false evidence#H....
- CONVICTION BASED ON APPROVER'S EVIDENCE - VALIDITY. ... CRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE - APPROVER - CORROBORATION - TEST - RELIABILITY OF APPROVER'S EVIDENCE - CORROBORATION ON MATERIAL PARTICULARS ... The approver delivered the peras and other sweets to Devi Ram's wife, who consumed them along with her family members. ... The test obviously means that the Court should find that there is nothing inherent or improbable in the evidence given by the approver....
referred three questions of law to the High Court under Section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, relating to the validity ... the admissibility of the evidence of the approver and the validity of the partion tendered by the Chief Judicial Magistrate would not arise. ... Of course, the tender of a fresh pardon in compliance with the requirements of law would again place Dhian Singh on the pedestal of an approver and a witness as such. Question No. 3 is answered in these terms. ... Thereaft....
of the evidence of an accomplice or approver. ... It highlighted the definition of 'accomplice' and 'approver' and analyzed the evidence of the witness in detail. ... The court emphasized the need for corroboration of the evidence of an accomplice or approver and the caution required in relying ... Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the law is well settled that the evidence of an accomplice or approver cannot be accepted unless it i....
Issues: The issues involved the credibility of the approver's testimony, the connection of the accused to the conspiracy, and the validity ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the appellants were known to the approver and the approver to them, and ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellants' vague excuses were unsupported by evidence, and the corroborated evidence ... Unless therefore we were to bold that no approver could ever give evidence b....
linking the accused with the bomb blasts, and the validity of the conspiracy claims made by the prosecution. ... The prosecution's reliance on the testimony of an approver and disclosure statements was scrutinized. ... identified by any witnesses - Defense argued that no proper identification was made, pointing to lack of corroboration from the approver ... A6 died and A7 was declared an approver, who gave evidence as PW1. A5 was not charge-sheeted. ... The only evidence before Court w....
Issues: Whether the evidence of the approver, influenced by psychiatric factors, could be deemed credible for the convictions ... Indian Penal Code - Sections 302, 376, 394, 404, 201, 34 - The court upheld the application of Sections 306 and 164, emphasizing the validity ... of accomplice evidence when corroborated, leading to the conviction of the accused. ... They contended that the evidence of the other witnesses did not corroborate the evidence of the approver. .....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.