Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
State Rep. by Inspector of Police – Appellant
Versus
G. Senthilkumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal has been filed by CBI challenging the acquittal judgment passed in C.C.No.13 of 2010 on the file of learned II Additional District Judge for CBI Cases, Madurai.
2. Brief facts of the case:
A1 to A6 and approver P.W.3 in C.C.No. 13 of 2010 on the file of the II Additional District Court for CBI Cases, Madurai entered into conspiracy to cheat the unemployed youth on the false promise of arranging employment in the railway protection force (RPF) by preparing forged application for the post of Sub Inspector of Police, police constable in RPF and forged index card, RPF selection card, RPF Chennai permission pass, RPF call letter for written examination, RPF identity slip cum free travel authority, RPF selection list on different occasions and appointment orders and allotment of duty and demanded, accepted various amounts from various witnesses and made repayment of part of the amount to some of the witnesses and gave the forged appointment order to P.W.2 and P.W.4. P.W.2 and P.W.4 approached P.W.5 Inspector of Police, Railway Protection Post, Madurai on the basis of the forged appointment order and duty allotment order on 14.06.2009 and requested to allow them to
The court ruled that acquittals in conspiracy cases must be based on a holistic appreciation of evidence, rejecting selective readings that undermine victims' rights and public justice.
The court ruled that the trial judge's acquittal was based on irrelevant contradictions, while the evidence established a clear demand and acceptance of bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The appellate court can overturn acquittals where the trial court's findings are perverse or unsustainable based on evidence, emphasizing the need for appropriate sentencing in cases of conspiracy an....
The court held that the appellant's actions constituted cheating and forgery, emphasizing misuse of authority and intent to deceive in bank transactions.
Point of law: So far as the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act is concerned, it trite that even the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act can be drawn only if an accused person has accep....
(1) Sanction for prosecution of public servant – There must be reasonable connection between the act and discharge of official duty.(2) Conviction based upon such a person who is unworthy of credit, ....
Point of law: So far as the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act is concerned, it trite that even the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act can be drawn only after demand for and acceptanc....
The conviction for conspiracy and bank fraud under various IPC sections is upheld based on corroborative testimony despite the absence of approvers in trial due to abscondence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
