AI Overview...
-
Final Decree Petition - The plaintiffs filed a petition for a final decree; however, the court refused to pass a final decree against minor defendants and did not sign the compromise petition on their behalf. The prayer portion of the compromise petition indicated the intended relief, but its treatment as a decree against minors was questioned. Ram Swarup Singh VS Kamala Prasad Singh - Patna
-
Prayer Portion Clarification - The prayer portion in legal documents often requires correction to accurately reflect the intended relief. For instance, in a civil revision petition, the prayer was amended for clarity and proper legal effect, especially under Rule 13 and Article 227 of the Constitution. A.Arumugam vs S.Manimaran - Madras
-
Misleading Prayer in Petition - A respondent misrepresented or moulded the prayer seeking possession, which influenced the court's decision. Ultimately, the revision petition was allowed, recognizing the right to apply for a final decree for sale of mortgaged lands. Nagamma VS S. P. Mabipal Reddy - Andhra Pradesh
-
Arbitration and Prayer Clauses - In arbitration cases, the prayer clause (excluding certain portions) determined the outcome. Some petitions were dismissed while others were granted based on the specific prayer clauses, leading to passing of decrees in accordance with awards. JAGDISH R. VORA VS ASIT C. MEHTA - Bombay
-
Amendments and Final Decree Challenges - An original petition challenging an amendment was dismissed when the court found the amendment necessary for just decision. Decrees and injunctions are granted based on the final prayer, but amendments can be contested if they do not serve the purpose. SOMANATHAN Versus SARADAMANI - Kerala
-
Implementation of Final Decree - Orders requiring impleading all parties from a final decree are scrutinized; the reliefs sought in the prayer portion must be clear and from the proper parties. Courts examine whether the prayer in the execution petition aligns with the decree parties. KUTTIYIL THODUVAYIL vs KAMALAKSHI AMMA - Kerala
-
Permission to Amend Prayer - Orders dated 29th November, 2008, highlight issues regarding the non-granting of permission to amend the prayer column in petitions for final decree. Rejection of such amendments impacts the proceedings and final reliefs. K. THIPPANNA @ THIPPENSWAMY VS VARALAKSHMI - Uttarakhand, K. Thippanna @ Thippeswamy VS Varalakshmi - Madhya Pradesh, K. Thippanna @ Thippeswamy. VS Varalakshmi - Supreme Court
-
Co-sharer Rights Post-Sale - Under the Partition Act, a co-sharer who sells a portion of joint family property without informing other co-sharers may still have rights to re-purchase or claim over the property, especially in cases involving joint family dwelling houses. The court emphasized the importance of proper notice and opportunity for co-sharers. Purna Chandra Mallik VS Renuka Jena - Orissa
Analysis and Conclusion:
The prayer portion in legal petitions is crucial as it defines the relief sought and guides the court's final orders. Proper drafting, amendments, and clarity in the prayer clause are essential for effective adjudication and enforcement of decrees. Courts have emphasized the importance of aligning the prayer with the parties' rights and the decree's scope, especially in complex matters like final decrees, amendments, and co-sharer rights. Misleading or improperly drafted prayer clauses can lead to challenges, amendments, or dismissals, underscoring the need for precise legal drafting and adherence to procedural requirements.
Search Results for "Final Decree Petition Prayer Portion"
1950 0 Supreme(Pat) 68 • India - Patna
NARAYAN, V.RAMASWAMI
The plaintiffs filed a petition for a final decree, but the court refused to pass a final decree against the minor defendants and ... their natural guardian and did not sign the compromise petition on their behalf. 2. ... Whether the compromise decree could be treated as a decree against the minor defendants? 2. ... The prayer portion of the compromise petition clearly shows that the dec....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 44973 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
The final directive includes correcting the prayer portion of the order to accurately reflect the intended request. ... Rule 13 to set aside an ex parte decree. ... The Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenges the dismissal of an application under Order 9 ... The prayer portion in the Order in CRP.SR.No.82552 of 2025 shall be read as follows : “PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under 227 of....
1990 0 Supreme(AP) 219 • India - Andhra Pradesh
J.ESWARA PRASAD
The respondent misled the court by moulding the prayer - portion in the petition by seeking delivery of possession which he never ... Final Decision: The revision petition was allowed. ... entitled to apply for a final decree for sale of the mortgaged lands. ... The respondent himself was quite alive to the fact that he would be entitled to have the mortgaged property sold, as seen from his affidavit filed in support of IA No. 441/80 for passing a final#HL_....
1999 0 Supreme(Bom) 862 • India - Bombay
D.K.DESHMUKH
terms of prayer Clause (a) excluding the bracketed portion. ... Final Decision: Arbitration Petition No. 236 of 1996 was dismissed, and Arbitration Petition No. 5 of 1997 was granted in ... Decree in terms of award No. 78 of 1996 was passed. ... In the result therefore, Arbitration Petition No. 236 of 1996 is dismissed where Arbitration Petition No. 5 of 1997 is granted in terms of prayer Clause (a) excluding the bracketed #HL_STA....
2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 26401 • India - High Court of Kerala
Kauser Edappagath, J
Final Decision: The original petition filed by the defendant challenging the order allowing the amendment is dismissed. ... court found that the amendment sought was necessary for the just decision of the case, as the Commissioner had reported that a portion ... Granting the decree of declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction alone would not serve any purpose if the plaintiffs ultimately ... Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed. ... The Commissioner reported that a gate and some oth....
2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24434 • India - High Court of Kerala
K.HARILAL, J
decree parties. ... Fact of the Case: The petitioners challenged an order that required them to implead all parties from a final decree ... Issues: Whether the Execution Court could require the petitioners to implead all parties from the final decree in their Execution ... Going by the prayer portion of the Execution Petition, as rightly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the reliefs sought for are not from the parties, who are....
2012 0 Supreme(UK) 63 • India - Uttarakhand
P.SATHASIVAM, J.CHELAMESWAR
The operative portion of the same is follows: ... “The impugned order dated 29th November, 2008 insofar as it relates to the non-granting of permission to the petitioner to amend the prayer column of the petition filed for drawing up of final decree pursuant to the order of this Court ... In the meanwhile, the Trial Court by its order dated 29.11.2008, rejected the prayer of the respondent for amendment of the application for final decree. ... The ....
2012 0 Supreme(MP) 137 • India - Madhya Pradesh
J.CHELAMESWAR, P.SATHASIVAM
CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE., 1908 -- O.20 R.18 and S.54 -- suit for partition of suit property was decreed -- co-sharer is not entitled ... The operative portion of the same is follows: ... “The impugned order dated 29th November, 2008 insofar as it relates to the non-granting of permission to the petitioner to amend the prayer column of the petition filed for drawing up of final decree pursuant to the order of this Court ... In the meanwhile, the Trial Court by its order dated 29-11-2008, r....
2012 2 Supreme 268 • India - Supreme Court
P.SATHASIVAM, J.CHELAMESWAR
The operative portion of the same is follows: ... “The impugned order dated 29th November, 2008 insofar as it relates to the non-granting of permission to the petitioner to amend the prayer column of the petition filed for drawing up of final decree pursuant to the order of this Court ... In the meanwhile, the Trial Court by its order dated 29-11-2008, rejected the prayer of the respondent for amendment of the application for final decree. ... The op....
2007 0 Supreme(Ori) 65 • India - Orissa
A.S.NAIDU
PARTITION ACT, 1893 - Secs. 3 and 4 - Whether a co-sharer of a joint family property after alienating a portion thereof in favour ... - Held, a co-sharer who has sold away a portion of a joint family dwelling house without intimation to other co-sharers and thereby ... have a right over the dwelling house sold to a stranger can be given opportunity to re-purchase the same - A co-sharer who sold a portion ... The Court below by its order dated 22.8.2006 in the final decree proceeding allowed the #HL_STAR....
Filter by Legal Phrase
