AI Overview

AI Overview...

Summary of Gangster Rule 2021

Analysis and Conclusion

The Gangster Rules, 2021, serve as a comprehensive procedural framework to regulate the implementation of the Gangster Act, 1986. They reinforce the importance of procedural safeguards, proper documentation, and compliance with prescribed procedures to prevent misuse of power and protect individual rights. Courts have consistently underscored that violations of these rules can lead to the quashing of proceedings, highlighting the Rules’ role in ensuring fairness and legality in gangster-related cases. Overall, the Rules aim to balance effective law enforcement with safeguarding constitutional protections.


References:
- Virendra Kasaudhan VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad
- Mohd. Arif @ Guddu VS State Of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad
- Usman VS State of U. P. - Allahabad
- Sanni Mishra @ Sanjayan Kumar Mishra VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad
- Sukarmpal @ Amit Jat VS State of U. P. - Allahabad
- Raju Pathak VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad
- Navneet Sachan vs State of U.P. - Allahabad
- Rahmat Ali @ Monu VS State of U. P. , Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. - Allahabad
- Zeba Rizwan VS State of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. - Allahabad
- Sanjay Verma VS State of U. P. - Allahabad

Search Results for "Gangester Rule 2021"

Virendra Kasaudhan VS State Of U. P.

2023 0 Supreme(All) 1830 India - Allahabad

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, SURENDRA SINGH-I

Rules, 2021, and in compliance with Rule 5(3)(d) of the Gangster Act. ... Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - [Rule 5(3)(d) of the Gangster Act, Ambuj Parag Dubey vs. ... by the District Magistrate as per the Gangster Rules, 2021, and the interpretation of 'Gang' and 'Gangster' under the Gangsters ... It may also be noted that Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) R....

Mohd.  Arif @ Guddu VS State Of Uttar Pradesh

2024 0 Supreme(All) 1042 India - Allahabad

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL

, Section 3(1); Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021, Rule 17 - The court emphasized the necessity ... 17(2) of the Gangster Rules, 2021. ... It highlighted that signing pre-typed satisfaction violates Rule 17(2) of the Rules, 2021, which mandates a clear expression of satisfaction ... Therefore, it clearly violates Rule 17 of the Gangster Rules, 2021. 19. ... Rule#HL....

Usman VS State of U. P.

2023 0 Supreme(All) 1022 India - Allahabad

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL

2 of Rule 22 of Rules, 2021, which is presently under investigation and wherein on basis of collected evidence it is proved that ... and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021Rule 5 (3)(c), 8, 10, 22 (2) – Quashing First Information Report – Writ petition ... 22 of Rules, 2021, which clearly carves out an exception to other Rules by providing that provisions of Gangster Act can be imposed ... Learned counsel for the petitioners by referring to Rule 5 (3)(c....

Sanni Mishra @ Sanjayan Kumar Mishra VS State Of U. P.

2023 0 Supreme(All) 1596 India - Allahabad

ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL

Prevention) Act, 1986 - Rule 8(3) and Rules 16, 17 of the Gangster Rules, 2021 Fact of the Case: p align ... Rules, 2021. ... Rules, 2021. ... Rule 8 of the Gangster Rules, 2021 is being quoted below: “8. ... Rule-5(3)(a) of the Gangster Rules, 2021 is being quoted as under: “5(3)(a). ... 16 of the Gangster Rules, 2021. ... of the Gangster Rule....

Sukarmpal @ Amit Jat VS State of U. P.

2024 0 Supreme(All) 1352 India - Allahabad

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL

Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021 - Rule 4(2) - Quashing of FIR - FIR linked to petitioner was filed over ... ... ... Issues: Legality of FIR under the Gangster Act and validity of established guidelines regarding definition of gangster behaviours ... Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Section 3(1); U.P. ... Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perusal of record, following two questions arise for....

Raju Pathak VS State Of U. P.

2023 0 Supreme(All) 1069 India - Allahabad

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, SURENDRA SINGH-I

Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021Rule 27, 22 – U.P. ... From perusal of Rule 27 and 22 of U.P. Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021, it is clear that the proceedings u/s 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters Act can be taken against the gangster after he has committed any of the offences mentioned in Rule 22 and his age is more than 16 years. ... Rule 22 of U.P. Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021#....

Navneet Sachan vs State of U.P.

2025 0 Supreme(All) 3513 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

SIDDHARTHA VARMA, MADAN PAL SINGH

5 of the Gangster Rules, 2021, a gang chart must be prepared and approved following a thorough discussion to determine a gang's ... 3, 9, 10, 11) ... ... (B) Procedural Requirements - Under Rule ... Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 3 - The petitioner challenges an FIR under the Gangster ... Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as the “Gangster Rules, #HL_STA....

Rahmat Ali @ Monu VS State of U. P. , Thru.  Addl.  Chief Secy.  Deptt.  Home Lko.

2023 0 Supreme(All) 1619 India - Allahabad

SHAMIM AHMED

Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act - Section 2/3 of Act 1986 - Rule 5(3)(a) and Rule 16 of Rules, 2021 p align ... liberty was given to the State to initiate fresh proceedings strictly in accordance with the provisions of Act, 1986 and Rules 2021 ... issue was whether the approval of the gang chart followed the prescribed procedure laid down in Rules 5(3)(a) and 16 of the Rules, 2021 ... He next submitted that so far in the present case, neither Rule 5(3)(a) nor #HL_....

Zeba Rizwan VS State of Uttar Pradesh Thru.  Prin.  Secy.  Home Lko.

2022 0 Supreme(All) 788 India - Allahabad

KRISHAN PAHAL

Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Section 3(1) and 19(4) - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302 - NDPS ... Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, stand satisfied and it is a fit case for bail. (Para 23.) ... Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. Result: Bail application is allowed. ... Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, which reads as follows :- “Section-19(4)-Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code, no person accused o....

Sanjay Verma VS State of U. P.

2023 0 Supreme(All) 1447 India - Allahabad

GAJENDRA KUMAR

Rule 5(3)(c) of the Rules, 2021 - Violation of Procedural Safeguards Fact of the Case: The applicant sought to quash ... Gangster Act - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Section 2/3 of Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention Act, 1986) - ... The court emphasized the importance of procedural compliance in gangster Act cases and highlighted the deprivation of the applicant's ... State of U.P. 2021 Cri. ... Learned counsel for the applicants has also drawn attention towards the mandatory complia....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top