AI Overview...

Gopakumar R. Thaliyal - Legal Counsel involved in various cases, representing respondents or petitioners, and actively participating in court proceedings Jisha Thomas D/o. Thankamma Thomas VS George Thomas S/o. K. V Thomas - Kerala, Sobhanakumari K. VS Santhosh - Kerala, ANIL KUMAR G. S. VS KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION - Kerala, Raveendran Nair, S/o Krishnan, Chairman And Managing Director, M/S Waltz Hospital Private Limited VS Musthafa. P. K, S/o Mammicha Haji - Kerala.
Jurisdiction in Family Court - Thaliyal argued that since children reside with the wife and study at Pallipuram, the Family Court, Alappuzha, has jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Guardian and Wards Act Jisha Thomas D/o. Thankamma Thomas VS George Thomas S/o. K. V Thomas - Kerala.
Legal Proceedings and Representation - Thaliyal appeared in multiple cases, including transfer petitions, guardianship, and impleadment applications, often alongside other counsels and amicus curiae, indicating his active role in complex litigation Sobhanakumari K. VS Santhosh - Kerala, ANIL KUMAR G. S. VS KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION - Kerala.
Specific Case Involvement - Notably, Thaliyal represented petitioners seeking urgent relief for issues such as hospital medicine retention worth Rs.10 lakhs, emphasizing the importance of swift judicial intervention to prevent wastage due to power outages Raveendran Nair, S/o Krishnan, Chairman And Managing Director, M/S Waltz Hospital Private Limited VS Musthafa. P. K, S/o Mammicha Haji - Kerala.

Analysis and Conclusion:
Gopakumar R. Thaliyal is a prominent legal counsel involved in family law, guardianship, and miscellaneous litigation in Kerala. His arguments often focus on jurisdictional issues and urgent relief measures. His participation underscores his expertise in handling sensitive cases requiring prompt judicial attention.

Search Results for "Gopakumar R Thaliyal"

Jisha Thomas D/o. Thankamma Thomas VS George Thomas S/o. K. V Thomas

2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 1172 • India - Kerala

V.G.ARUN

Gopakumar Thaliyal, learned Counsel for the respondent. 5. Shorn of the disputed factual contentions, which I am not bound to consider in these transfer petitions, the legal contentions put forth by Dr. ... In reply, Sri.Gopakumar R.Thaliyal put forth the following contentions; As the children are residing with the wife and are studying in a school at Pallipuram, the Family Court, Alappuzha is the jurisdictional court in terms of Section 9 of the Guardian and Wards Act.

THE BRANCH MANAGER vs T K SASIDHARAN Advocate - GOPAKUMAR R THALIYAL ,GOPAKUMAR R THALIYAL

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 17998 • India - High Court of Kerala

Devan Ramachandran, J

SHEEJA VIJAYAKUMAR vs M R DEEPU Advocate - GOPAKUMAR R THALIYAL, ,GOPAKUMAR R THALIYAL,R B RAJESH

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 16043 • India - High Court of Kerala

V. G. Arun, J

M I SHAJAHAN vs ALICE @ ALICE GEORGE Advocate - GOPAKUMAR R THALIYAL, ,GOPAKUMAR R THALIYAL,R B RAJESH

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34294 • India - High Court of Kerala

K.HARILAL, A.M.BABU, JJ

TOONZ ANIMATION INDIA PVT LTD vs SRI S AJITHKUMAR Advocate - GOPAKUMAR R THALIYAL, ,GOPAKUMAR R THALIYAL,R B RAJESH

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6221 • India - High Court of Kerala

A. Muhamed Mustaque, J

2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 1340 • India - Kerala

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, P.UBAID, A.M.BABU

Gopakumar R. Thaliyal, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Suman Chakravarthy, the learned public prosecutor. Advocate Sri. K.A. Salil Narayanan was appointed amicus curiae. We heard the learned amicus curiae also. ... 3.

Vaishna Vinod, D/o. Kalamalini VS Employees State Insurance Corporation

2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 495 • India - Kerala

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

Gopakumar R. Thaliyal, Sri. S. Sreekumar, Sri. Ajit G. Anjarlekar, Sri. Anchal C. Vijayan, Sri. Thomas Abraham, Sri. T.B. Hood and Sri. Millu Dandapani, learned counsel appearing for the various appellants, Sri.

ANIL KUMAR G. S. VS KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 202 • India - Kerala

P.N.RAVINDRAN, R.NARAYANA PISHARADI

Gopakumar R.Thaliyal, learned counsel appearing for the applicants in I.A.No.64 of 2018 who seek impleadment as additional respondents 3 and 4 in the writ appeal and Smt.K.R.Deepa, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the State of Kerala. ... Per contra, Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, learned counsel appearing for the Commission, Smt.K.R.Deepa, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the State of Kerala and Sri.Gopakumar R. ... Thaliyal, learned counsel appearing for the additional respondents seeking impleadment....

Raveendran Nair, S/o Krishnan, Chairman And Managing Director, M/S Waltz Hospital Private Limited VS Musthafa. P. K, S/o Mammicha Haji

2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 229 • India - Kerala

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V.

Faced with the said submissions, Sri.Gopakumar R. ... Thaliyal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the main grievance of the petitioner is that medicines worth Rs.10 lakhs retained in the hospital will be rendered useless, if the same is not taken out in an expeditious manner, particularly since the electricity supply has been

SURESH R S vs S SUGATHAKUMARI Advocate -SRI GOPAKUMAR R THALIYAL

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37537 • India - High Court of Kerala

A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?