Courts have held that mere possession or residence does not establish adverse possession unless all legal criteria are met Mahar Chand VS State Of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh.
Adverse Possession and Legal Requirements
Courts have dismissed claims of adverse possession where prior eviction or repeated encroachment is established, emphasizing the need for clear proof Chandi Prasad VS State Of H. P. - Himachal Pradesh.
Government Actions and Encroachment Removal
Ejectment procedures must follow prescribed legal rules; notices issued without proper procedures are liable to be set aside Sonoram Chakma & Ors. VS State of Arunachal Pradesh & Ors. - Gauhati.
Legal and Procedural Framework
Courts have emphasized that encroachers cannot claim rights over government land through adverse possession if they have been previously evicted or have no lawful title Chandi Prasad VS State Of H. P. - Himachal Pradesh.
Judicial Decisions on Encroachment Cases
Legal rulings consistently recognize the state's authority to remove encroachers from government land, emphasizing procedural correctness and the burden of proof on encroachers to establish adverse possession. Claims of lawful ownership or adverse possession are often rejected if prior eviction or illegal occupation is proven. Authorities are encouraged to explore settlement options before eviction, but encroachment without lawful rights remains subject to removal and legal action.
References: - Netan Tsering VS State of AP - Gauhati - State Of Kerala VS Sunil Kumar S. - Supreme Court - KARAM CHAND VS STATE OF H. P. - Himachal Pradesh - Neera Manhar W/o Shri Sukhiram Manhar VS State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh - Sasmita Tripathy VS State of Odisha - Orissa - Sonoram Chakma & Ors. VS State of Arunachal Pradesh & Ors. - Gauhati - Mahar Chand VS State Of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh - Chandi Prasad VS State Of H. P. - Himachal Pradesh - MURALI PADHI ALIAS MURALIDHAR PADHI VS TAHASILDAR - Orissa - COMMUNIDADE OF MOROMBIO GRANDE VS JOSE AUTONIO RODOILO ACUAVIVA BRAGANZA - Bombay
The petitioner contended that he had not encroached upon any government land and sought reconsideration for NOC issuance. ... issuance of NOC if the petitioner is found not to be involved in encroachment, damage, and abetment of encroachment of Government property ... the Govt. officials has not encroached upon any Govt. property nor has caused any damage or abetted encroachment on the public property by a private person. ... the Govt. officials has ....
property. ... of encroached land and 38.42 acres of encroached planted area already resumed by Forest Dept. on lease to respondent—Arijit Pasayat, J.
ADVERSE POSSESSION - Adverse possession - Ownership rights - Evidence - Plaintiffs had admitted the ownership of the State Govt. ... No doubt, an encroacher on the Government land could apply for grant of illicitly possessed land as Nautor to him under Rule 21 of the Rules ibid, provided that he had encroached upon the land before 17th of July, 1951. ... As and when such encroached land was desired to be acquired as Nautor by the encroacher, he had to make an application on a court fee of Re. 1 accompan....
interpretation would impel Court to hold that when a person shares an encroached property by residing there and there is continuance ... elected office-bearer incur disqualification as envisaged – Held, If any of office-bearer himself/herself is occupier of Government property ... under encroachment, then he/she will not be able to command and discharge duties attached to post properly - Concept of purposive ... The Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Janabai (supra) has considered this issue and held that persons who are u....
of public property. ... could be removed from public property and must restore benefit of unjust enrichment taken from public property - Rules provide for ... have not disputed that they are the encroachers on the government land without any lawful right - Once the petitioners admittedly, encroached ... An encroacher could be removed from public property and must restore benefit of unjust enrichment taken from public property. The Rules provide for forfeiting left ove....
and order –Court however leave respondents free take action as may be permissible law against appellants are encroachers or have encroached ... have been sustained and ought not be sustained –Court therefore these appeals and set aside decision reached and directions given judgment ... Court conclude that case hand impugned notices having been issued without support rules prescribing procedure for ejectment an encroacher ... One of the purposes is embodied in Regulation 72(c), namely, to provide for the ejectment of any person, who has #H....
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner had established adverse possession over the encroached land. ... The judgment emphasized the need for the encroacher to establish all facts necessary to prove adverse possession and the duty of ... The judgment also underscored the encroacher's responsibility to establish all facts necessary to prove adverse possession. ... or part thereof which shall be recoverable as an arrear of land revenue for causing loss and damage to the Govt, property....
The judgment also highlighted the power of Revenue Officers to impose fines and recover mesne profits derived from illegal occupation ... Property. ... Collector has clearly observed that the petitioner has time and again encroached upon the same land as the petitioner and his brother were evicted from the same land in the year 1991. As such, the claim of adverse possession is not sustainable. ... It is also clearly proved from the record that the petitioner is deliberately trying to linger on the eviction proceedings so as to derive bene....
The court held that the Tahasildar, appellate and revisional authorities failed to consider the question of settlement of the encroached ... From a reading of the provisions of Section 7, it is clear that the statute casts a duty on the Tahisildar while considering to Summarily evict a person unauthorisedly occupying Govt. property, under Sub-Section (1) to consider whether the encroached land can be settled with the said person instead of ... Shri Panda does not, and in our view rightly, press the point that Gramakantha....
The suit property which was alleged to have been encroached upon by the father of defendant No. 1 sometime in 1946. ... The documents showed that an area admeasuring 26,370 sq. metres was granted to late Egidio and the deceased had encroached upon neighbouring ... It was contended by the plaintiff that it is an absolute owner and possessor of a rustic property. ... This plan leaves no doubt regarding the identification of the respective properties, namely the property originally granted to Egidio Bragan....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.