Right to Sue Does Not Survive - Several sources confirm that the right to initiate or continue legal proceedings generally does not survive the death of a party, especially in personal actions such as divorce or pre-emption cases. For example, the High Court held that the right of pre-emption does not survive to heirs under the Rajasthan Pre-emption Act, 1966 (Kailash Chandra VS Smt. Gyarsi Devi - Rajasthan) and that a divorce petition dismissed due to the death of a spouse is not maintainable, as the right to sue does not survive (KIMTI LAL VS INDU KUNDRA - Delhi).
Survivability of Rights in Certain Cases - Conversely, in civil and contractual matters, the right to sue may survive the death of a party, allowing legal heirs or representatives to continue the action. Examples include causes of action for damages for breach of contract (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, U. S. M. WORKS LTD. VS SUJATA ROY - Calcutta) and applications under Section 14 of the Act, where the right to sue was considered to survive (KEDAR NATH VS RAM NATH ETC - Delhi).
Application in Criminal and Bail Proceedings - In criminal law, an application for bail in the High Court is not a review of the lower court's order, and the right to seek bail may not survive if not applied for within the prescribed period (Lambodar Bag VS State of Orissa - Orissa). Additionally, bail rights that are not exercised during the default period are enforceable only prior to the filing of the challan, and do not survive afterward (State VS E. Veeramani - Crimes).
Legal Procedures and Court Orders - The principles of abatement of suits and applications are tied to whether the right to sue survives; if it does, applications can be made to bring legal representatives on record, and suits may continue despite delays (Tirtha Bararty VS Dingar Kanda - Orissa, Bhanwar Devendra Singh VS M/s. Meenakshi Projects Ltd. - Rajasthan). However, the court emphasized that the survivability of such rights depends on the nature of the cause of action.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The general legal principle is that the right to sue does not survive in personal actions such as divorce or pre-emption, leading to the abatement of suits upon the death of a party. Conversely, rights related to contractual or civil causes of action may survive, allowing heirs or legal representatives to continue proceedings. In criminal law, procedural rights like bail are time-sensitive and do not typically survive default periods or after the filing of a challan. Courts assess survivability based on the nature of the claim and the applicable statutes, with procedural rules like Order 22 of the CPC guiding the process for substituting legal heirs or preventing abatement (Tirtha Bararty VS Dingar Kanda - Orissa, Bhanwar Devendra Singh VS M/s. Meenakshi Projects Ltd. - Rajasthan).
References:
- Lambodar Bag VS State of Orissa - Orissa, State VS E. Veeramani - Crimes, Chandralok (B) Chs. Ltd. VS Manish Rajnikant Jaitha - Bombay, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, U. S. M. WORKS LTD. VS SUJATA ROY - Calcutta, Tirtha Bararty VS Dingar Kanda - Orissa, Kailash Chandra VS Smt. Gyarsi Devi - Rajasthan, KIMTI LAL VS INDU KUNDRA - Delhi, KEDAR NATH VS RAM NATH ETC - Delhi, Maharani Dey and others VS Debabrata Bardhan and another - Gauhati, Bhanwar Devendra Singh VS M/s. Meenakshi Projects Ltd. - Rajasthan
BAIL - An application for bail in the High Court is not an application for review of the order of the Court below - Grounds not taken ... CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - Sec. 439 - Prosecution report submitted u/s. 20 (b) (ii) (C) of the NDPS Act, 1985 - Bail application ... for not making such application for bail during the default period - In the factual scenario, the petition....
to be released accruing to accused in such a situation is enforceable only prior to filing of challan - Right does not survive or ... is enforceable only prior to the filing of the challan and it does not survive or remain enforceable on the challan being filed, ... Besides, although it may not be possible for a Court hierarchically subordinate to the High Court, which granted bail to the accused ... Learned counsel for the responde....
survive, and that the application for impleadment should be allowed despite delays, viewing justice as paramount. ... (A) Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Article 227 of the Constitution of India -Challenge against order allowing application ... The original plaintiff died, leading to concerns over the right to sue and the application process for impleading the heirs. ... It is submitted that therefore the said application is an #HL_STA....
The defendants opposed the application, arguing that the suit was a personal action and the right to sue did not survive to the heirs ... CAUSES OF ACTION - DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT - NOT A PERSONAL ACTION - RIGHT TO SUE SURVIVES TO LEGAL HEIRS - APPLICATION FOR ... Issues: Whether the suit was a personal action and the right to sue did not survive to the heirs of the deceased plaintiff .......
to abate if the right to sue survives - In the event of death of a party, where the right to sue does not survive, the suit shall ... to sue has survived, then an application could be filed to bring the legal representatives of the deceased defendant on record within ... CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 - Order 22 Rule 9 - An application for setting aside the abatement has to be treated at par and the principles ... Rule 1 of Or....
Finding of the Court: The High Court held that the right of pre-emption does not survive to the heirs of the pre-emptor ... PRE-EMPTION - RIGHT OF PRE-EMPTION - RAJASTHAN PRE-EMPTION ACT, 1966 - APPLICABILITY - RIGHT OF PRE-EMPTION DOES NOT SURVIVE TO ... Plaintiff appealed to the High Court. ... Law, right of pre-emption does not s....
does not survive to the legal heirs — Appeal against the order dismissing divorce petition, not maintainable. ... Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13(1)(i-b) — Cruelty — Abatement of proceedings — Dismissal of divorce petition — Right to sue ... The Hon ble Supreme Court further held that the right to sue would also survive even if the other spouse died pending such appeal or application under Order IX Rule 13 of....
Whether the right to sue on the basis of the application under Section 14 of the Act survives in favor of the landlord, against the ... The right to sue on the basis of the application under Section 14 of the Act, which was pending before the Controller at the time ... The right to sue on the basis of the application under Section 14 of the Act, which was pending before the Controller at the time ... court, the right to pursue the #....
did not survive on his death. ... The court directed the MACT to consider the substitution application of the petitioners and dispose of the same in accordance with ... This view has been supported by several High Courts, including the Calcutta High Court. 2. ... Lodh, the learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the approach of the learned Tribunal that it was a personal cause and it does not survive....
survive against the remaining defendants. ... The court further held that the suit could not abate as the right to sue survived against the remaining defendants, who were the ... The court referred to Order 22, Rule 4(1) of the C.P.C., which provides that a suit can abate only when the right to sue does not ... As per Order 22, Rule 4 (1) the suit can be abated only when right to sue does #HL_STA....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.