AI Overview

AI Overview...

Number of Members in the Supreme Court of India

  • Members of the Supreme Court of India: The Supreme Court of India is composed of currently 34 judges, including the Chief Justice of India and other judges. The total strength is initially fixed at 34 judges, as per the Constitution and subsequent judicial appointments general knowledge, not directly from sources.

Additional Insights from Provided Sources

Conclusion

The Supreme Court of India currently has 34 judges serving as its members. The Court plays a crucial role in adjudicating a broad spectrum of legal issues, including constitutional matters, statutory disputes, and the regulation of the legal profession. It maintains a firm stance against lawyer strikes and boycotts, reinforcing the importance of judicial integrity and the rule of law general knowledge, supplemented by insights from sources.


References: - General knowledge about the Supreme Court's composition. - Multiple judgments and references emphasizing judicial discipline and legal standards (e.g., Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India). - Specific sources discussing legal fraternity conduct and court proceedings.

Search Results for "How Many Members in Supreme Court of India"

Chennai Citi Centre Holdings, (P) Ltd. , Represented by its authorized signatory, P. T.  Shahul Hameed VS Designated Committee under Sabka Vishwas Legacy Disputes Resolution Scheme, 2019, (Commissioner of GST & Central Excise), Chennai

2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 1322 India - Madras

ANITA SUMANTH

Hon’ble Supreme Court has allowed the lessees to file a Civil Appeal challenging the applicability of service tax in such matters ... on immovable property rented by their members. ... effect that the lessees of petitioner have effected remittances towards the service tax dues of petitioner – Held, Association of India ... Retailers Association of India have represented that in many cases, department has initiated proceedings against lessors from non-payment of service tax on rent on i....

K.V.BABU RAJ vs THE STATE OF KERALA

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15631 India - High Court of Kerala

A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, Easwaran S., JJ

The court emphasized that lawyers cannot strike or boycott court proceedings, referencing Supreme Court decisions. ... (A) Legal Profession - Call for Boycott - The court addressed the absence of counsel due to a boycott call by the Kerala High Court ... (Paras 2-4) ... ... (B) Contempt of Court - The court reiterated that strikes by lawyers amount ... We might usefully remind the members of the legal fraternity of the decision of....

BRINDA vs  STATE OF KERALA

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15630 India - High Court of Kerala

A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, Easwaran S., JJ

The court cited Supreme Court precedents regarding the illegality of strikes and boycotts by lawyers, emphasizing that such actions ... (A) Legal Profession - Call for Boycott - The court addressed the absence of counsel due to a boycott call by the Kerala High Court ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court dismissed the cases without prejudice, allowing litigants to seek restoration within one ... We might usefully remind the members of the l....

JIMMY ELIAS vs SMT. ELIZABETH JASMINE

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15634 India - High Court of Kerala

A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, Easwaran S., JJ

The court cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. ... Union of India, emphasizing that lawyers cannot strike or boycott court proceedings. ... (A) Legal Profession - Calls for Boycott - The court addressed the absence of counsel due to a boycott call by the Kerala High Court ... We might usefully remind the members of the legal fraternity of the decision of the Supreme Court in Ex- Capt. Harish Uppal v. ... As J....

Abdulla. H. Naushad S/o. Hassan Naushad Vs State Of Kerala Transport Department

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15633 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, Easwaran S., JJ

The court emphasized that lawyers cannot strike or boycott court proceedings, referencing Supreme Court decisions. ... (Paras 2-4) ... ... (B) Contempt of Court - The court reiterated that strikes by lawyers violate ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court dismissed the cases without prejudice, allowing for restoration upon showing sufficient cause ... We might usefully remind the members of the legal fraternity of the decis....

NOORJAHAN vs SALAHUDEEN

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15632 India - High Court of Kerala

A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, Easwaran S., JJ

The court cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. ... The court emphasized the need for accountability among Bar Association members who call for strikes. ... Union of India, emphasizing that lawyers cannot strike or boycott court proceedings. ... We might usefully remind the members of the legal fraternity of the decision of the Supreme Court in Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India and Ano....

ABDULLA. H. NAUSHAD vs THE STATE OF KERALA TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT

2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 534 India - High Court of Kerala

DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S., JJ

The court emphasized that lawyers cannot strike or boycott court proceedings, referencing Supreme Court decisions. ... (Paras 2 - 4 ) (B) Contempt of Court - The court reiterated that strikes by lawyers ... Findings of Court: The court dismissed the cases without prejudice ... We might usefully remind the members of the legal fraternity of the decision of the Supreme Court in Ex-Capt. Harish U....

Vijay Dhanji Chaudhary VS Suhas Jayant Natwadkar

2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1378 India - Supreme Court

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, A.K.PATNAIK

Committee of Supreme Court of India is already seized of most of the issues that have been raised in these suggestions - Therefore ... Advocates Act,1961 - Supreme Court Rules, 1966 – Jurisdiction – Acquitted - Unfortunately, many special ... and Accounts paper being a part of the AOR examination - If same is deleted there would be better participation of members of Bar ... We are informed by the registry that the Rule Committee of the Supreme #HL_ST....

Board of Control VS KPH Dream

2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 1739 India - Bombay

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANOOP V.MOHTA

Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9, Clause 11.7, Clause 21.6 Fact of the Case: The Board of Control for Cricket in India ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the termination was based on erroneous factual grounds and that the franchisee ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the franchisee had established a strong prima facie case for interlocutory relief, as ... The judgment of the Supreme Court in Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd. (AIR 1986 SC 1370) ....

V.SENTHIL vs THE SECRETARY

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 17532 India - High Court of Madras

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J

Finding of the Court: The court held that the Bar Association cannot restrict an advocate's right to practice law, ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner was suspended from the Bar Association for attending court proceedings despite a boycott ... Boycott of Lawyers are dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in many Judgments and the Apex Court in an unequivocal terms held that one day boycott would be the last resort of any Bar Associati....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top