AI Overview...
-
Concurrent Findings of Revenue Courts - When revenue courts arrive at concurrent findings of fact, these are generally binding and should not be disturbed unless they are based on no evidence or misreading of material. Courts have emphasized that such findings are to be respected as they reflect factual correctness Ajeet Singh S/o Shri Kishan Singh VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, PRABHAKARA KAMMATH Vs THE TAHASILDAR - Kerala.
-
Jurisdiction and Revisional Powers - The Maharashtra Land Revenue Code permits multiple revisions, and revenue courts acting as courts of concurrent jurisdiction have the inherent power to examine the legality and propriety of decisions/orders passed in revision. However, once concurrent findings are recorded, revisional courts or higher authorities should exercise restraint in upsetting these unless gross irregularities are evident Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani VS State of Maharashtra - Supreme Court.
-
No Revision Allowed if Findings are Concurrent - If revenue authorities or courts have made concurrent factual findings, subsequent revisions or appeals are generally dismissed, as the findings are binding unless shown to be based on no evidence or misreading. For example, a High Court dismissed a revision petition where the lower courts' concurrent findings were upheld, indicating no irregularity or error in procedure Prithi And Others vs Satya Narain - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Interference with Concurrent Findings - Courts have cautioned against upsetting concurrent findings without proper evaluation of evidence, emphasizing that such findings should only be disturbed if they are unsupported by evidence or involve a violation of natural justice. Overturning such findings without proper grounds constitutes an error Charan Dass deceased through LRs VS Subhadra Devi - Himachal Pradesh.
-
Legal Principles on Finality of Findings - The principle that concurrent findings of fact by revenue or administrative authorities are final and binding is reinforced, with courts generally refraining from interference to uphold the stability of revenue administration Anchhi VS General Manager (Recovery) State Financial Corporation, Janjati Vikas Bhawan, Pratapnagar, Udaipur - Rajasthan.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The consensus across the sources is that concurrent findings of revenue courts are binding and generally not subject to revision or appeal, barring exceptional circumstances such as a lack of evidence or procedural irregularities. The courts prioritize the finality and stability of revenue judgments, emphasizing that revisional and appellate authorities should exercise caution before disturbing such findings. Therefore, if revenue courts have made concurrent findings of fact, no revision lies unless these findings are unsupported by evidence or involve a violation of principles of natural justice.
Search Results for "If Concurrent Finding of Revenue Courts then no Revision Lies"
2015 0 Supreme(SC) 1060 • India - Supreme Court
M.Y.EQBAL, C.NAGAPPAN
Government and ‘or’ for other Revenue officers – Suggesting jurisdiction of State Government to be concurrent with other Revenue ... ... Finding of the Court: ... ... entitled to examine legality and propriety of any decision/order passed in revision by the Revenue officers (Para 27) ... “…We record our finding that under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code more than one revision is possible. N....
1961 0 Supreme(All) 135 • India - Allahabad
MITHAN LAL
Finding of the Court: The court held that the revenue court, acting as a court of concurrent jurisdiction, could exercise ... The court emphasized that the revenue court, acting as a court of concurrent jurisdiction, could exercise its inherent jurisdiction ... Ratio Decidendi: The revenue court, acting as a court of #HL_ST....
2025 Supreme(Online)(PH) 2527 • India - High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Nidhi Gupta, J
of revenue authority findings. ... (A) Civil Procedure Code - Section 100 - Permanent injunction - Second appeal against concurrent judgments decreeing the plaintiff's ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff by the lower courts, dismissing the defendants' claims ... Therefore, there are no irregularities in the order of the lower revenue courts. The revision petition is hereby dismissed."....
2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1235 • India - Rajasthan
NUPUR BHATI
Ratio Decidendi: Concurrent findings of fact are binding unless based on no evidence or misreading of material. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the orders did not violate natural justice and concurred with the authorities ... application for opening a way in his field, which led to orders from the Tehsildar, Additional District Collector, and Board of Revenue ... The Board of Revenue also, on the same count, while concurring with th....
2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40631 • India - High Court of Kerala
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that concurrent findings of fact by administrative authorities should not be interfered with ... decisions of the Revenue Divisional Officer which highlighted procedural adherence and findings rooted in evidence regarding the ... Fact of the Case: The appellant purchased land from original assignees, but the Revenue Divisional Officer later canceled ... Under these circumstances, on a finding of fact, when there is concurre....
2010 0 Supreme(Raj) 673 • India - Rajasthan
G.K.TIWARI
is competent to make final declaration of the title with regard to the civil property situated in abadi area — Concurrent finding ... Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, Secs. 75, 76, 256/257 — Revision petition — Maintainability — Non-petitioner No. 3 took loan from ... before Revenue Appellate Authority and not in Board. ... Thus, both the courts below have given concurrent finding of facts that the attached property belongs to the loanee-defaulter o....
2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 1284 • India - Punjab and Haryana
PARAMJEET SINGH
Revenue Act, 1887 or Lambardari Rules that a person having five children, cannot be appointed as Lambardar. ... Punjab Land Revenue (Lambardari) Rules, 1908, R.16, R.17 & R.15--Lambardar--Appointment of--Held; there is no bar in the Punjab Land ... There is no bar in the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 or Lambardari Rules that a person having five children, cannot be appointed as Lambardar. ... ... In view of above discussion and concurrent findings recorded by authorities below with regard to suitabilit....
1969 0 Supreme(SC) 170 • India - Supreme Court
R.S.BACHAWAT, S.M.SIKRI, K.S.HEGDE
fact that no reference under Section 289 (2) was made, finding of Revenue Court that Civil Court was competent to entertain appeals ... could not be challenged in High Court - No reason for setting aside this concurrent finding of fact - Appellant did not obtain possession ... can disagree with finding and make reference. ... The High Court agreed with this finding. We see no reason for setting aside this #HL_START....
2016 0 Supreme(HP) 1911 • India - Himachal Pradesh
MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, SANDEEP SHARMA
by upsetting the concurrent findings of the revenue authorities without proper evaluation of evidence. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the Financial Commissioner (Appeals) had exceeded its revisional powers ... Issues: The main issues were whether the Financial Commissioner (Appeals) had the jurisdiction to upset the concurrent findings ... findings of facts recorded by the revenue court....
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 349 • India - Bombay
SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
- Secondly once it is held that Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide correctness of finding recorded by Mamlatdars Court there ... ,1950 - Article 227 - Exception to concurrent - Interim injunction - Special Civil Suit - Order challenged - As Respondents-Plaintiffs ... - Even if this Court considers same it being a point of law it cannot be upheld- Firstly because to operate any order or finding ... Secondly, it is submitted that, the finding of the fact recorded by....
Filter by Legal Phrase
