SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1235

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
NUPUR BHATI, J.
Ajeet Singh S/o Shri Kishan Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10071 of 2020
Decided on : 07-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Trilok Singh

Concurrent findings of fact are binding unless based on no evidence or misreading of material.

Headnote:

Natural Justice Violation - Land Dispute - Rajasthan Tenancy Act - Section 251 - Summary: The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the orders to open a recorded way on disputed land, citing that the Tehsildar's order did not violate natural justice, and the Additional District Collector and Board of Revenue concurred that no new way was opened, only a recorded way was reopened.

Fact of the Case:

The respondent submitted an application for opening a way in his field, which led to orders from the Tehsildar, Additional District Collector, and Board of Revenue. The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging these orders.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the orders did not violate natural justice and concurred with the authorities' findings that no new way was opened, only a recorded way was reopened.

Issues: Violation of natural justice, jurisdiction of the Tehsildar, and the authority to challenge the recorded way.

Ratio Decidendi: Concurrent findings of fact are binding unless based on no evidence or misreading of material. The orders did not violate natural justice, and no new way was opened, only a recorded way was reopened.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed for lacking merit.

ORDER :

(1) The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:-

    “(a) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the judgment dated 05.07.2018 (Annexure-P/7) passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer, judgment dated 23.10.2013 (Annexure/ P/5) passed by the learned Tehsildar, Hanumangarh, may kindly be quashed and set aside.

(b) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the matter may kindly be remanded back to the Tehsildar, Hanumangarh for passing a reasoned and speaking order after hearing the petitioners on the application moved by the private respondent for opening of the way from the land of the petitioners.”

(2) The facts apropos to the case are that the respondent No.2 Wali Mohammed submitted an application (Annex.P/1) before the District Collector, Hanumangarh for opening the way in his field situated at Chak 6 HMH, Stone No.160/270 square No.160/270 square No.41, Kila No.1-5, against the present petitioners which came to be forwarded to the Tehsildar (Revenue), Hanumangarh, who in turn, called factual report from the Patwari Halka, Amarpura Thedia with regard to the dispute for the way. The Patwari submitted his factual report with the dispute of way on 03.06.2013 (Annex.P/2) before the Tehsildar, Hasnumangarh.

(3) The Tehsildar, Hanumangarh thereafter isued an order/communication dated 04.06.2013 to the Inspector (Land Records), Hanumangarh and directed him to open the way and report accordingly.

(4) Being aggrieved of the order dated 04.06.2013 (Annex.P/3), passed by the Tehsildar, Hanumangarh, the petitioners preferred an appeal before the learned Additional District Collector, Hanumangarh, which came to be dismissed vide order dated 23.10.2013 (Annex.P/5). Being aggrieved of the order dated 23.10.2013 (Annex.P/5), the petitioners preferred a revision petition before the learned Board of Revenue, which too was dismissed vide judgment dated 05.07.2018 (Annex.P/7).

(5) Hence, being aggrieved of the judgment dated 05.07.2018 (Annex.P/7) passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer, order dated 23.10.2013 (Annex.P/5) passed by the Additional District Collector, Hanumangarh and order dated 04.06.2013 (Annex.P/3), passed by the Tehsildar, Hanumangarh, the petitioners prefers the present writ petition.

(6) Learned counsel for the petitioners made the following submissions:-

(a) that the Tehsildar, Hanumangarh passed the order dated 04.06.2013 (Annex.P/3) without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and thus, violated the principles of natural justice. The Additional District Collector as well as the Board of Revenue did not consider this aspect of the matter.

(b) that actual factual report was not brought to the notice of the Tehsildar, Hanumangarh as there is a residential dhani on the land and also an electricity transformer is installed for the last so many years and the Tehsildar, Hanumangarh directed to open the way without issuing any notice even to the petitioner but also to the electricity department as there is an electricity transformer on the land and the Additional District Collector as well as the Board of Revenue also did not consider this aspect of the matter.

(c) that the jurisdiction to entertain an application under Section 251 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act lies with the concerned Gram Panchayat and even if the application was moved before the Tehsildar, the Tehsildar should have referred the matter to the concerned Gram Panchayat. Hence, the Tehsildar has exceeded its jurisdiction while entertaining the application filed by the respondent no.2 and the Additional District Collector and the Board of Revenue have also, without application of mind, upheld the order passed by the Tehsildar and thus, have committed serious illegality.

(7) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record.

(8) This Court finds that the Patwari Halka, Amarpura Thedi, in his report, clearly mentioned that as per the jamabandi, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top