AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Interim decrees in partition suits serve critical functions, including maintaining the status quo and facilitating fair property distribution. Courts balance the need for interim relief with the finality of decrees, often granting stays or restraining orders to prevent injustice. Appeals against these orders are permissible but are generally limited to those with conclusive or final effect. Proper classification of interim decrees—whether as preliminary, interim final, or conclusive—determines their enforceability and appealability. Ensuring timely disposal of partition cases is vital to uphold justice and prevent protracted disputes.
References: Pabbathi Venkataramaiah Chetty VS Pabbathi N. Rathanamaiah Chetty - Supreme Court, Bharat Wadhwa VS Sushma Arora - Delhi, Mohammad Shakil VS Girish Chandra - Allahabad, Kandaswamy Koundar VS Thirumurthy Goundar and another - Madras, VILOCHANA AND ANOTHER vs DEVU AND OTHERS - Kerala, Pabbathi Venkataramaiah Chetty VS Pabbathi N. Rathnamaiah Chetty - Rajasthan, K. M. Venugopal Pillai VS K. M. Madhava krishnan and others - Madras, Chandrajit Singh VS Ratanjit Singh - Himachal Pradesh

Search Results for "Interim Decree on Partition"

Pabbathi Venkataramaiah Chetty VS Pabbathi N. Rathanamaiah Chetty

2007 3 Supreme 336 India - Supreme Court

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, DALVEER BHANDARI

partition—Prayer for interim stay of execution of decree—High Court directed building not to be demolished—Appeal—Appellant was in ... Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Section 96—Appeal against final decree in a suit for ... The Appeal against final decree filed before the High Court may become infructuous if stay of dispossession is not granted. ... This appeal arises from an interim order of the High Court. The Appellant herein has filed an appeal against the final decree....

Bharat Wadhwa VS Sushma Arora

2013 0 Supreme(Del) 756 India - Delhi

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

They also sought interim relief restraining the defendants from pressing for final decree in the partition suit and from creating ... the execution of the decree for partition to the outcome of the present suit. ... It granted interim relief restraining the defendants from dealing with the property and subjecting the execution of the decree for ... The plaintiffs alongwith the suit have filed this application for interim relief restraining the defend....

Mohammad Shakil VS Girish Chandra

2019 0 Supreme(All) 1627 India - Allahabad

HARSH KUMAR

and not against interim orders such as the preparation of a partition scheme. ... Second Appeal - Partition Suit - Appealability of Interim Orders Fact of the Case: The appellant filed a second appeal ... Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the legal position that in a partition suit, appeal lies only against the final decree ... In a partition suit, unless a partition scheme is finalized and final decree is prepared, no appeal l....

Kandaswamy Koundar VS Thirumurthy Goundar and another

1977 0 Supreme(Mad) 521 India - Madras

V.SETHURAMAN

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Order 20, Rule 18-Interim final decree passed in a suit for partition-Final decree passed directing ... payment of mesne profits-Held, final decree valid. ... In the present, ease the decree dated 14th February, 1959 was itself in the nature of an interim final decree. Ex facie it stated that it was not a final decree disposing of the suit in toto. Against that decree, there was an app....

VILOCHANA AND ANOTHER vs DEVU AND OTHERS

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 38130 India - High Court of Kerala

THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J

They sought timely disposal of their interim and final decree applications amid pending objections to the Advocate Commissioner's ... Fact of the Case: Petitioners filed for a final decree for partition in an ongoing case since 1984. ... Partition - Petition for Final Decree - O.S. 45 of 1984 - The court emphasized the need for timely disposal of pending applications ... No.1356 of 2006 which is for passing a final decree for partition in O.S. No.4....

MARY ANITHA LATHA Vs ADLEIN PUSHPAVENI

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43352 India - High Court of Kerala

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ

Fact of the Case: The appellant, as the 2nd defendant, appealed against a partition suit's final decree. ... The court granted interim stays on proceedings and later directed mediation due to the potential for settlement. ... Appeal - Partition - CPC Sections 96, Order XLI - Appeals set aside in terms of mediation settlement. ... R.F.A.No. 139 of 2020:- The appellant is the 1st defendant in O.S.No.184 of 2013 on the file of the Sub Court, Vatakara, a suit for partition. ... The learned counsel for the....

Chandrajit Singh VS Ratanjit Singh

1994 0 Supreme(HP) 39 India - Himachal Pradesh

D.P.SOOD

- PRELIMINARY DECREE - INTERIM RELIEF - JURISDICTION - CAUSE OF ACTION - COLLATERAL PROCEEDINGS - RES JUDICATA - FRAUD - CONCEALMENT ... - SECTION 10 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - SAME PARTIES - SAME SUBJECT MATTER - COPARCENARY PROPERTY - HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY - PARTITION ... Ratanjit Singh, filed a suit seeking declaration, partition, and separate possession of his share in the disputed coparcenary property ... Ripjit Singh and late Raja Charanjit Singh came to an end and relationship of H.U.F. thereby was disrupted Th....

Sivalinga Pathar VS Narayani Ammal

1945 0 Supreme(Mad) 262 India - Madras

YAHYA ALI

The widow of Ekambara filed a suit claiming a share in the properties, leading to the passing of an interim decree. ... The court also considered the nature of the interim decree and its conclusive effect, as well as the possibility of amending the ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the interim decree was conclusive and that the first defendant could not ... The first defendants advocate appeared and stated that the first defendant had no objection to an interim....

Pabbathi Venkataramaiah Chetty VS Pabbathi N. Rathnamaiah Chetty

2007 0 Supreme(Raj) 193 India - Rajasthan

DALVEER BHANDARI, R.V.RAVEENDRAN

C.P.C., Order 39 Rule 1 – Interim relief – Partition suit – Appeal against the final decree in a suit for partition – Sought stay ... of execution of final decree – Appellant in possession and running lodge there in – Refusal of stay would render appeal infructuous ... This appeal arises from an interim order of the High Court. The Appellant herein 8 has filed an appeal against the final decree in a suit for partition. ... In the said appeal, he soug....

K. M. Venugopal Pillai VS K. M.  Madhava krishnan and others

1963 0 Supreme(Mad) 178 India - Madras

ANANTANARAYANAN, RAMAKRISHNAN

Fact of the Case: In a partition suit, the interim final decree specified and declared the items allotted to the second ... Finding of the Court: The court held that the interim final decree, which was the consent decree in the suit, did not ... HINDU LAW - PARTITION - CONSENT DECREE - EFFECT OF S. 14(1) OF HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956 - WHETHER ENLARGED THE LIMITED INTEREST ... As far as the two ladies in the suit were concerned, namely, the secon....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top