AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The legal consensus across the sources indicates that for an accused to be convicted of abetment to suicide, it must be proven that they had a specific wish or intention that the victim should die. Casual remarks or circumstances stemming from anger or marital discord, without explicit intent, do not meet the threshold. The courts scrutinize the entire context, emphasizing the absence of positive acts or direct evidence of a desire for death. Therefore, the wish of the accused that the deceased should die is a crucial element, and its absence can lead to acquittal or dismissal of charges Manikandan VS State - Crimes, V. Venkataraman VS State, Represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ayanavaram Range - Madras, Bhimsen Bag VS State of Orissa - Orissa.


References:
- Manikandan VS State - Crimes
- V. Venkataraman VS State, Represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ayanavaram Range - Madras
- Ayyappan VS State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Arupukottai Town Police Station - Madras
- Ramesh Kumar VS State of Chhattisgarh - Crimes
- Ramesh Kumar VS State of Chhatisgarh - Supreme Court
- Bhimsen Bag VS State of Orissa - Orissa
- Romit Soni VS State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. - Allahabad
- Atchutuni Saibaba VS State Represented by the Inspector of Police - Andhra Pradesh
- Suresh Kumar & Another VS State represented by The Inspector of Police & Another - Madras
- Savitaben Rameshbhai Sodha Parmar VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat

Search Results for "It should be Wish of Accused that the Deceased should Die"

Manikandan VS State

India - Crimes

P.DEVADASS

and willingness of victim to die but has to be the wish of accused — Appellant and deceased were students and fell in love but it ... It is not the wish and willingness nor the desire of the victim to die, it must be the wish of the accused, it is the intention on ... the part of the accused that the victim should die that matters much.

V. Venkataraman VS State, Represented by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ayanavaram Range

2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 2578 India - Madras

P.DEVADASS

– It would not show any intention or wish on the part of the accused that his wife should die – It would not show any positive act ... information in the nature of instigation, provocation, forcing the victim to commit suicide – Now reading the alleged handwritings of the deceased ... on the part of the accused forcing her to commit suicide – Prosecution has not established the charges framed against the accused ... Now reading the alleged handwritings of the deceased....

Ayyappan VS State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Arupukottai Town Police Station

2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 3550 India - Madras

P.DEVADASS

commit suicide, die - It is established that deceased was not happy that her husband was not given her necessary money to run the ... to do so - It is not wish of victim to commit suicide - The requirement of mensrea will be attributed only to the accused - There ... P.W.4s other daughter and son are P.W.1 and P.W.5 - Appellant and deceased were living in Village they were blessed with a child ... The deceased told him that her husband had poured kerosene upon her and set fire on her. ....

Ramesh Kumar VS State of Chhattisgarh

2001 7 Supreme 737 India - Crimes

R.C.LAHOTI, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN

The accused is a Professor. The deceased did not come up to the expectations of the accused. ... Presumably because of disinclina­tion on the part of the accused to drop the deceased at her sister’s residence the deceased felt ... The accused Ramesh may or must have told the deceased that she was free to go anywhere she liked. ... The reading of the entire evidence shows that the present one is a case of marital mal-adjustment between the ....

Ramesh Kumar VS State of Chhatisgarh

2001 7 Supreme 737 India - Supreme Court

A. S. ANAND, K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, R. C. LAHOTI

The accused is a Professor. The deceased did not come up to the expectations of the accused. ... Presumably because of disinclination on the part of the accused to drop the deceased at her sister s residence the deceased felt ... The accused Ramesh may or must have told the deceased that she was free to go anywhere she linked. ... The reading of the entire evidence shows that the present one is a case of marital mal-adjustment between the ....

Bhimsen Bag VS State of Orissa

2018 0 Supreme(Ori) 49 India - Orissa

S.K.SAHOO

Abetment - Criminal Proceeding - Indian Penal Code - 306/34 Fact of the Case: The petitioners are accused of abetting ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the conduct of the petitioners created circumstances compelling the deceased ... Issues: The main issue was whether the conduct of the petitioners had a proximate link with the commission of suicide by the deceased ... Presumably the accused may have said some such thing -you are free to do whatever you wish and go wherever you like. ... ....

Romit Soni VS State Of U. P.  Thru.  Prin. Secy.  Addl.  Chief Secy.  Home Deptt.

2024 0 Supreme(All) 265 India - Allahabad

SUBHASH VIDYARTHI

The deceased's suicide note accused the applicant of harassment and non-repayment of money. ... The accused Ramesh may or must have told the deceased that she was free to go anywhere she liked. Maybe that was in a fit of anger as contrary to his wish and immediate convenience the deceased was emphatic on being dropped at her sister's residence to see her. ... Presumably the accused may have said some such thing — you are free to do whatever you wish and go wherever yo....

Atchutuni Saibaba VS State Represented by the Inspector of Police

2004 0 Supreme(AP) 998 India - Andhra Pradesh

P.S.NARAYANA

Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374 (2) - Abetment to suicide - Criminal Trial - Conviction and sentence - Appeal preferred by the Accused ... P1 and the explanation given by him in this regard is definitely highly suspicious - Evidently, initially, the relatives of the deceased ... The accused Ramesh may or must have told the deceased that she was free to go anywhere she liked. May be that was in a fit of anger as contrary to his wish and immediate convenience the deceased was emph....

Suresh Kumar & Another VS State represented by The Inspector of Police & Another

2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 5188 India - Madras

C.T.SELVAM

The accused Ramesh may or must have told the deceased that she was free to go anywhere she liked. May be that was in a fit of anger as contrary to his wish and immediate convenience the deceased was emphatic on being dropped at her sisters residence to see her. ... Presumably the accused may have said some such thing – you are free to do whatever you wish and go wherever you like. ... Unfortunately, the trial court misspelt out the meaning of the expression attributed by the ....

Savitaben Rameshbhai Sodha Parmar VS State of Gujarat

2019 0 Supreme(Guj) 704 India - Gujarat

ABDULLAH GULAMAHMED URAIZEE

Court has to take into consideration all the attending circumstances to record a satisfaction that by conduct and overt acts, the accused ... used to pick up quarrel with deceased regarding household work and used to scold deceasedDeceased left matrimonial home three ... and the father-in-law of deceased had gone to bring back the deceased therefore, complainant had sent deceased to matrimonial home ... The accused Ramesh may or must have told the....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top