AI Overview...
- Jairajsingh Temubha Jadeja - Main Points and Insights:
- Jadeja has been involved in criminal cases, including serious charges under IPC sections such as 302, 307, 120B, etc., indicating his alleged involvement in violent crimes and conspiracy HARDIK MOTILAL SHETH VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, Gobarbhai Naranbhai Singala VS State of Gujarat - Supreme Court, Gobarbhai Naranbhai Singala VS State of Gujarat - Crimes.
- He has moved applications for remand and bail, with courts examining the legality of these motions, referencing legal principles established in prior judgments, notably the Gujarat High Court's decision in Jairajsinh Temubha Jadeja v. State of Gujarat 2002 (1) GLR 215 HARDIK MOTILAL SHETH VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, Central Bureau of Investigation VS Amit Shah - Gujarat, Indira Vishnoi W/o Shri Mohan Lal Vishnoi VS Director, Central Bureau of Investigation - Rajasthan.
- The courts have considered his antecedents, statements by witnesses, and the nature of the investigation during proceedings involving him Gobarbhai Naranbhai Singala VS State of Gujarat - Crimes, JAIRAJSINH TEMUBHA JADEJA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat.
- The 2002 Gujarat High Court judgment clarified legal principles regarding remand and bail, emphasizing that remand should not be used solely to obtain confessional statements or discover evidence, and that bail decisions depend on the nature of the offense and the accused's conduct HARDIK MOTILAL SHETH VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, Central Bureau of Investigation VS Amit Shah - Gujarat, Indira Vishnoi W/o Shri Mohan Lal Vishnoi VS Director, Central Bureau of Investigation - Rajasthan.
-
The Supreme Court and High Court have discussed that repeated misuse of liberty does not justify bail in serious cases like murder, and that remand is an interlocutory order subject to judicial review Latifkan Karamkhan VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Indira Vishnoi W/o Shri Mohan Lal Vishnoi VS Director, Central Bureau of Investigation - Rajasthan.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- Jairajsinh Temubha Jadeja's legal history reflects involvement in serious criminal activities, with courts scrutinizing his applications for remand and bail based on established legal principles.
- Judicial decisions emphasize caution in granting bail or remand in cases involving grave charges, considering the accused's antecedents, witness statements, and the nature of the offense.
- The 2002 Gujarat High Court judgment remains a significant reference point, highlighting that remand is not to be misused and that bail decisions are contingent on specific legal criteria.
- Overall, Jadeja's case illustrates the application of procedural safeguards and principles of criminal jurisprudence in handling serious criminal allegations involving public figures like legislative members HARDIK MOTILAL SHETH VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, Central Bureau of Investigation VS Amit Shah - Gujarat, Indira Vishnoi W/o Shri Mohan Lal Vishnoi VS Director, Central Bureau of Investigation - Rajasthan.
References: - Gujarat High Court, Jairajsinh Temubha Jadeja v. State of Gujarat, 2002 (1) GLR 215 - Court proceedings and remand/bail applications involving Jadeja JAIRAJSINGH TEMUBHA JADEJA VS STATE - Gujarat, Gobarbhai Naranbhai Singala VS State of Gujarat - Supreme Court, Gobarbhai Naranbhai Singala VS State of Gujarat - Crimes, JAIRAJSINH TEMUBHA JADEJA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, Central Bureau of Investigation VS Amit Shah - Gujarat, Latifkan Karamkhan VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay, Indira Vishnoi W/o Shri Mohan Lal Vishnoi VS Director, Central Bureau of Investigation - Rajasthan
Search Results for "Jairajsingh Temubha Jadeja"
2001 0 Supreme(Guj) 733 • India - Gujarat
J.R.VORA
Jayrajsinh Jadeja (petitioner No. 1 in this application ). (10) The offence has been committed after hatching a conspiracy of finishing life of Mr.
2018 0 Supreme(Guj) 341 • India - Gujarat
J.B.PARDIWALA
A learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of Jairajsingh Temubha Jadeja vs. State of Gujarat [2002 (1) GLR 215] has explained in details the position of law. ... Jadeja moved an application for 05 days remand before the learned 11th Additional Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ahmedabad (Rural) today. The Court concerned passed an order granting remand upto 19.12.2017 and, hence, this application. ... 5.
2008 1 Supreme 582 • India - Supreme Court
ASHOK BHAN, ALTAMAS KABIR
Satodiya seeking cancellation of the bail granted to respondent Shri Jayrajsinh Temubha Jadeja who, at that time, was a sitting Member of Legislative Assembly of Gujarat (the first accused in Criminal Case No.1-25/2004 registered under Sections 302, 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 341, 120B, 201 IPC and Sections ... ... 29.Taking the overall view of the entire matter and in particular to the antecedents of the respondent-Jayrajsinh Temubha Jadeja, the alleged statements made by the witnesses, who were present at the spot, to t....
• India - Crimes
ALTAMAS KABIR, ASHOK BHAN
Satodiya seeking cancellation of the bail granted to respondent Shri Jayrajsinh Temubha Jadeja who, at that time, was a sitting Member of Legislative Assembly of Gujarat (the first accused in Criminal Case No.1-25/2004 registered under Sections 302, 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 341, 120B, 201 IPC and Sections ... 29.Taking the overall view of the entire matter and in particular to the antecedents of the respondent-Jayrajsinh Temubha Jadeja, the alleged statements made by the witnesses, who were present at the spot, to the ....
2009 0 Supreme(Guj) 551 • India - Gujarat
H.N.DEVANI
Jadeja had gone to the spot to carry out investigation. Thus, the police inspector went to investigate upon being informed that there was an incident of shooting and hence, the proceeding taken by him thereafter was during the course of the investigation. ... During the course of the examination-in-chief of the prosecution witness No.44 ‘Navalsinh Bhikhubha Jadeja below Exhibit 504, the said witness has deposed that on 8.2.2004, the P.S.O. informed him about the incident and he immediately reached the spot. It was approximately 10:00 O’clock at night.
2010 0 Supreme(Guj) 227 • India - Gujarat
AKIL KURESHI
Counsel relied on decision of this Court in case of Jairajsinh Temubha Jadeja vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2002 (1) GLR 215. ... 7.
2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 712 • India - Gujarat
R.M.CHHAYA
At this juncture, it would be appropriate to refer to the judgment in the case of Jairajsinh Temubha Jadeja (supra), wherein it has been observed thus:-- ... "14. ... Relying upon the ratio laid down by this Court in the case of Jairajsinh Temubha Jadeja v. State of Gujarat, reported in 2002 (1) GLR 215, it was contended that the remand cannot be granted to obtain confessional statement or discover material used by the accused.
2008 0 Supreme(Bom) 606 • India - Bombay
V.R.KINGAONKAR
Jayrajsingh Temubha Jadeja and another), 2008 DGLS (soft) 113 : A.I.R. 2008 S.C.W.10 14", it is held that the fact that accused did not misuse his liberty while on temporary bail twice, by itself is no ground to grant bail in a murder case, especially when he was allegedly involved in a subsequent case
2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 436 • India - Rajasthan
P.K.LOHRA
In Jairajsinh Temubha Jadeja (supra), Gujarat High Court has dilated on the principle of granting or non-granting remand in exercise of power under Section 167 Cr.P.C. ... ... (4) Jairajsinh Temubha Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat [2002 (1) GLR 215]. ... (5) Shashibala Sharma, Trustee and Principal Vs. State of Gujarat [(2004) 2 GLR 1393]. ... (6)Mujahid vs.
• India - Crimes
RAJESH H.SHUKLA
On the other hand, in the judgment of this High Court in the case of Jairajsinh Jadeja (supra) it has been observed that it is an ... He has also pointedly referred to the observations made in the judgment in the case of Jairajsinh Temubha Jadeja v. ... On the other hand, in the judgment of this High Court in the case of Jairajsinh Jadeja (supra) it has been observed that it is an interlocutory order.
Filter by Legal Phrase
