AI Overview...
-
Jurisdiction of Educational Tribunals in Uttarakhand - Educational Tribunals in Uttarakhand primarily handle grievances related to educational institutions, including disputes over admissions, fees, and administration. Petitioners, such as employees or students, are directed to approach these Tribunals for redressal of their grievances (IND_HC_UKHC010168592021). The Tribunals exercise jurisdiction under specific statutes like the Uttarakhand Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fees) Act, 2006, and related rules (02600013213). They also function within the scope of the powers conferred by the relevant laws, and their orders can be challenged through appeals under the statutory framework, but special appeals against Tribunal awards are generally not maintainable (02600005209).
-
Scope and Limitations - The jurisdiction of the Education Tribunals is subject to the provisions of relevant statutes and constitutional provisions. The High Court of Uttarakhand has the power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to examine cases related to educational disputes, but it generally defers to the Tribunals for initial redressal (02600008999). Orders passed by Tribunals can be challenged through appeals, but the scope of such appeals is limited, and the Tribunals' jurisdiction is protected from interference by other courts or authorities, including the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over officers of the High Court and Supreme Court (INDCAT00000005682).
-
Relation to Other Courts and Authorities - The High Court of Uttarakhand supervises and exercises jurisdiction over cases involving educational institutions, but it recognizes the specialized jurisdiction of Tribunals. The High Court’s jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is invoked mainly when Tribunals or authorities exceed their jurisdiction or fail to exercise it properly (02600013819). The Supreme Court has also clarified that Tribunals' jurisdiction is limited to statutory functions, and orders from Tribunals are subject to judicial review primarily on grounds of jurisdictional errors (INDCAT00000005682).
-
Conclusion - The Uttarakhand Educational Tribunal has a specialized jurisdiction to resolve disputes related to educational institutions, including grievances of employees and students. While the High Court has the power to exercise jurisdiction under constitutional provisions, it generally respects the Tribunals' authority, intervening mainly in cases of jurisdictional excess or procedural errors. Appeals against Tribunal decisions are governed by statutory rules, and the jurisdiction of other courts, including the High Court and Supreme Court, is circumscribed accordingly (02200017852, 02600013213, 02600005209).
Search Results for "Jurisdiction of Educational Tribunal in Uttarakhand"
2014 0 Supreme(Ori) 353 • India - Orissa
I.MAHANTY, B.N.MAHAPATRA
exemption under Sec.11 of the Act - Appeal - Capital expenditure incurred by the educational institution is the basic necessity ... Act - Both the first appellate authority and the learned I.T.A.T. held that the respondent-educational institution is eligible for ... date of assessment, registration granted under Sec.12-AA was not withdrawn - Learned Assessing Officer held that the respondent-educational ... The High Court of Uttarakhand in the case of CIT Vs. ... Queens Educational Society reported in 3....
2022 0 Supreme(UK) 103 • India - Uttarakhand
S. K. MISHRA, R. C. KHULBE
of the Rules of Court 1952, Uttarakhand Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation ... Special Appeal - Maintainability of Intra-Court Appeal - Rule 5 of Chapter VIII of the Rules of Court 1952 - Uttarakhand Unaided ... Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fees) Act, 2006 - [Rule 5 of Chapter VIII ... of its power of superintendence or in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction or in the exercise of the #HL_....
2021 0 Supreme(UK) 779 • India - Uttarakhand
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
of its power of superintendence or in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction or in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution in respect of any judgment, order or award—(a) of a tribunal, Court or statutory arbitrator made or purported to be made in the exercise ... Aggrieved by the order dated 23.04.2013, the appellant preferred an appeal before the Cooperative Tribunal Uttarakhand, Dehradun, which registered as Appeal 06/2013 titled as “Ravindra Kumar Pant ....
2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 2167 • India - Bombay
R.V.GHUGE
State of Uttarakhand and others, highlighting the equitable principles prohibiting recovery against the employee in the absence of ... A writ of certiorari can be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction committed by inferior courts or Tribunals; these are cases where orders are passed by inferior courts or tribunals without jurisdiction, or in excess of it, or as a result of failure to exercise jurisdictions. ... State of Uttarakhand and others), (2012) 8 S.C.C. ....
2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4207 • India - Central Administrative Tribunal
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Anand S. Khati, A
Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 and, especially, Section 2(c) therein which states that any officer or servant of Supreme Court or any High Court shall not be subject to jurisdiction of this Tribunal. 5. ... 8.3 In Sri Jeyaram Educational Trust & Ors., v. A.G.Syed Mohideen & Ors. reported in AIR 2010 Supreme Court 671, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as under:-"6. ... /order dated 05.04.2024 (Annexure A-2) (iii) Direct the Respondent herein to acknowledge the nomination of the Applicant as the Ombudsman & Ethics Offic....
• India - High Court of Uttarakhand
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma
Aggrieved employees of such institutions must seek redressal from the Educational Tribunal. ... Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Educational Tribunal for redressal ... Tribunal for redressal of their grievances. ... Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. ... Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with the liberty left open to the petitioners to approach the Educational....
2010 0 Supreme(UK) 644 • India - Uttarakhand
V.K.BIST, TARUN AGARWALA
1952 — A Special Appeal is not maintainable thereunder against a judgment, passed in a writ petition, challenging an award of the Tribunal ... or in the exercise of its power of superintendence or in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction [or in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution in respect of any judgment, order or award – (a) of a tribunal, Court or statutory arbitrator made or purported ... In the present case, the award was passed by the Tribunal ....
2015 0 Supreme(UK) 279 • India - Uttarakhand
V.K.BIST, U.C.DHYANI
(B)Constitution of India, 1950, Art. 226 – High Court is empowered to exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction ... Similarly, it has also been pointed out that due to illegal strike of the employees of Ministerial cadre of State of Uttarakhand, number of students could not get their domicile certificates, caste certificates resulting which, they were deprived of getting admission in the Educational Institutions. ... In the case of strike by a teacher, entire educational system suffers; many students are prevented from ap....
2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 12882 • India - High Court of Delhi
MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
as the primary grievance was against the Uttarakhand Ayurveda University - The court emphasized that merely having a part of the ... (Paras 10-13) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The petitioner-institute, located in Uttarakhand ... cause of action arise within its jurisdiction does not compel the court to exercise its jurisdiction. ... Union of India 2012 SCC OnLine Del 5264, has held that in case of pan India Tribunals, or Tribunals/statutory authorities having jurisdictio....
2022 0 Supreme(UK) 356 • India - Uttarakhand
SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA
petitioner's argument that the police exceeded its jurisdiction in investigating the case. ... The court also held that the offense under Section 506 was cognizable and non-bailable in the state of Uttarakhand, rejecting the ... Additionally, the court determined that the offense under Section 506 was cognizable and non-bailable in the state of Uttarakhand ... Uttarakhand on reorganization. ... By virtue of Section 28 of the Reorganization Act, the newly established Uttarakhand High Court had the #HL_ST....
Filter by Legal Phrase
