AI Overview...
-
Quashing Orders - Several petitions seek to quash impugned orders dated 2.12.2022 and other dates, citing violations of legal principles or procedural errors. For example, the petitioners in INDHP00000054031 request to quash the order to allow secondary evidence of a lost Will, emphasizing adherence to the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Sections 64 and 65) Naresh Kumar vs Bharti Sharma - Himachal Pradesh.
-
Court Interventions - Courts have allowed petitions and set aside impugned orders, indicating that the orders were either unlawful, passed without proper consideration, or violated principles of natural justice. For instance, in INDCHH00000041336, the court set aside the Revenue Board's order on land title issues, emphasizing the importance of proper resolution of title disputes Chandrahas Sao vs The Chhattisgarh Board Of Revenue - Chhattisgarh.
-
Disciplinary and Service-Related Orders - Several cases involve challenging disciplinary dismissals or orders affecting service benefits. Courts have quashed disciplinary orders due to bias or procedural lapses (IND01000011662, IND01000011686), ensuring justice and adherence to natural justice principles IND01000011662, IND01000011686.
-
Criminal and Civil Proceedings - Some petitions seek to quash FIRs or criminal proceedings, citing abuse of process or procedural flaws. For example, in INDCHH00000010323, the order taking cognizance of offences under the Gambling Act was challenged, with courts tending to quash such proceedings if procedural violations are proven Anant Navratan Jain vs State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh.
-
Specific Orders and Reliefs - Many cases highlight specific reliefs such as setting aside orders, directing authorities to allow work or benefits, or remanding cases for proper consideration. The consistent theme is the judicial preference for fairness, legality, and proper procedure in administrative and judicial orders.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The overarching trend across these sources is that courts are willing to quash or set aside impugned orders when they are found to be arbitrary, procedurally flawed, or in violation of legal principles. The key grounds for quashing include violations of natural justice, procedural lapses, or incorrect application of law. This underscores the judiciary’s role in ensuring administrative fairness and adherence to legal standards when challenging impugned orders dated 2.12.2022 or similar judgments.
Search Results for "Kindly Quash the Impugned Order Dated 2 12 2022"
2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 8004 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Bipin Chander Negi, J
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 64 and 65 - Secondary evidence - Petitioners sought to lead secondary evidence of a lost Will dated ... Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) The present petition has been preferred seeking the following relief:- “(a) Kindly quash the impugned order dated 2.12.2022 (Annexure P-1X) and allow the i petitioners to lead secondary evidence of the registered ... 2. Heard counsel for the p....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10097 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Arvind Kumar Verma, J
... ... Result: The petition is allowed, and the impugned order is set aside. ... Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 109 and 110 - Challenge to the legality and validity of the Revenue Board's order on land title ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court set aside the Revenue Board's order, emphasizing that matters of title must be resolved ... By way of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased issue appropriat....
2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13928 • India - Central Administrative Tribunal
MR. AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J, MRS. MALLIKA ARYA, ACJ
She challenged the removal order issued against him, maintaining her right to pensionary benefits. ... 8.2 That, this Hon’ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 19.01.2022 (Annexure A/12), in the interest of justice. ... 8.6 That, this Hon’ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to quash/set aside the impugned termination memorandum w.e.f.27/0....
2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 405 • India - Chhattisgarh
PARTH PRATEEM SAHU
be pleased to set aside impugned order passed by respondent no. 2 and further be pleased to direct respondent authorities to allow ... Prastav) Rules, 1994 - Rules 3, 4 & 6 - Allow to work as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat - No-confidence motion - Hon’ble Court may kindly ... rules framed thereunder, further observing that Collector has not considered service of notices under Rules of 1995 and has passed impugned ... 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to ....
2024 Supreme(Online)(CG) 6242 • India - High Court of Chhattisgarh
Therefore, the impugned orders dated 24.09.2022 (Annexure A/1) and order dated 06.12.2018 (Annexure A/2) are liable to be set aside. 5. ... Hence, it is prayed that this Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant revision and set aside the order dated 24.09.2022 (Annexure A/1) & accordingly quash the order dated 06.12#H....
2024 0 Supreme(All) 86 • India - Allahabad
RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
the impugned order dated 15.12.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Pratapgarh in S.T. ... State of Rajasthan (2017) 7 SCC 706 - The court set aside the impugned order dated 15.12.2023 passed by ... Final Decision: The impugned order dated 15.12.2023 was set aside and quashed, and the matter was remanded ... (ii) And it is further prayed that this H....
2025 0 Supreme(Chh) 2 • India - HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
... ... Result: The impugned order was quashed, and the petitioner was to receive all service benefits. ... Appeal) Rules, 1966 - Principle of natural justice - The petitioner challenged the dismissal of his appeal against a disciplinary order ... disciplinary inquiry flawed due to bias and violation of natural justice principles, leading to the quashing of the disciplinary order ... The petitioner has filed this petition inter alia with the following reliefs: “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pl....
2025 Supreme(CHH) 26 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 - Principle of natural justice - The petitioner challenged the disciplinary authority's order ... The petitioner has filed this petition inter alia with the following reliefs: “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/ set-aside the impugned Order Kramank/770 New Raipur, dated 15/12/2023 issued by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest & Head of Forest ... Forces, arising out of Order K....
2025 0 Supreme(All) 2665 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Revenue Code, 2006 - Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash charge-sheet and cognizance order - Allegations of encroachment ... (A) Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Sections 2 and 3 - U.P. ... the FIR was an abuse of process as the Revenue Code provides a complete mechanism for addressing encroachments - The Magistrate's order ... Charge-Sheet dated 12/12/2021, filed before Learned A.C.J.M.- Court No. 17, Sultanpur, cognizance date....
2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 2382 • India - High Court of Chhattisgarh
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
the FIR No. 207 of 2023 for offences under the Chhattisgarh Gambling (Prohibition) Act, 2022 and IPC. ... filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash ... (IV) That, it is humbly prayed to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 20.02.2024 (Annexure P/2) whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Baikunthpur has taken cognizance of the impugned ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
