AI Overview

AI Overview...

Search Results for "Legality of Fardbeyan Statements by Minor Eyewitnesses"

B. N. Singh @ Bishwanath Singh VS State of Jharkhand

India - Crimes

R.R.PRASAD, R.N.VERMA

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 302 r/w 120B and 148 — Conviction on dying declaration recorded as fardbeyan of deceased by Police ... Officer — Sustainability of conviction when the police officer author of fardbeyan as well doctor who conducted post mortem on deceased ... post-mortem report as secondary evidence with no objection raised by defence — PWs 6, 7 and 10 very specifically disposed that fardbeyan ... —The appellants call in question the legality of the judgment of conviction dated 19.12.2006 and order of se....

Kaila Mahto vs The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 1576 India - High Court of Jharkhand

Sujit Narayan Prasad, Rajesh Kumar, JJ

The discrepancies in the evidence of eyewitnesses, if found not to be minor in nature, may be a ground for disbelieving and discrediting their evidence. ... This Court, before proceeding to examine the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, deems it fit and proper to refer the background of prosecution case, as per the fardbeyan of P.W.5, Jehali Mian (Informant), which reads as under: 3. ... Thereafter, his attention has been drawn towards the statement made by the ....

Jugal Mahto VS State Of Bihar

2007 0 Supreme(Jhk) 265 India - Jharkhand

DABBIRU GANESHRAO PATNAIK, DILIP KUMAR SINHA

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 – murder – clear, cogent and uncontroverted statements of P.Ws. – also consistent medical evidence ... Learned Counsel for the appellant has next challenged the legality of the fardbeyan claiming that the same could not be used as the first information report, since even according to the admitted case of the prosecutions witnesses, the same is hit under Section 162 Cr.PC. ... ... The issue raised by the appellant in the instant case would have assumed significance if there was any material contradict....

Pappu Rabidas @ Pappu Das S/o Etwari Das VS State Jharkhand

2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1124 India - Jharkhand

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR

The court also underscored the principle that minor variations and contradictions in the evidence of eyewitnesses may not tilt the ... It noted contradictions in the statements of the witnesses and highlighted the failure of the prosecution to establish the guilt ... This Court, before proceeding to examine the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, deems it fit and proper to refer the background of institution of prosecution case, as per fardbeyan of informant, whic....

Inderjeet Patro @ Indrajeet Pater son of Rashu Patro VS State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)

2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 849 India - Jharkhand

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, SUBHASH CHAND

Much was sought to be made of minor discrepancies in the evidence of the two eyewitnesses, which have been described as glaring contradictions. ... The statements which are recorded immediately upon the incident would have to be given a little leeway with regard to the statements being made and recorded with utmost exactitude. ... The appellant's presence has been proved by two eyewitnesses. It has been proved by the eyewitnesses, that the appellant carried a rifle. But PW 2 and PW 3 d....

Harminder Mandal VS State of Bihar

2013 0 Supreme(Pat) 193 India - Patna

SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA, ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI

Whether the prosecution had failed to substantiate the genesis as well as the manner of occurrence as initiated as per the fardbeyan ... court found that the prosecution had failed to substantiate the genesis as well as the manner of occurrence as initiated as per the fardbeyan ... . - SECTION 34 IPC - FIR - MINOR AND MAJOR CONTRADICTION - MATERIAL CONTRADICTION - TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES - SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE ... The discrepancies in the evidence of eyewitnesses, if found to be not minor in nature, m....

Ramadhir Singh @ Ramadhin Singh, son of Late Chandi Prasad Singh VS State Jharkhand

2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1166 India - Jharkhand

NAVNEET KUMAR, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

Issues: Credibility of eyewitness testimony, alleged contradictions among eyewitnesses, delay in dispatching ... defense's contentions regarding the presence of the informant at the place of occurrence and the alleged contradictions among the eyewitnesses ... Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for careful assessment and evaluation of eyewitness testimony, highlighting that minor ... This Court, before proceeding to examine the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, deems ....

Kunwar Lakra vs State of Jharkhand

2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1199 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, SANJAY PRASAD

court emphasized the necessity for evidence to be cogent and credible (Para 55); ratio decidendi highlights that minor ... Having examined all the eyewitnesses even if other persons present nearby were not examined, the evidence of the eyewitnesses cannot be discarded. ... This Court, before proceeding to examine the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, deems it fit and proper to refer the background of institution of prosecution case. ... She had further stated that Police came at ....

Chhotu Singh @ Ajay Singh, S/o.  Lodha Singh VS State of Jharkhand

2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 281 India - Jharkhand

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI

The Arms Act sections were referenced to establish the legality of the firearms used in the crime. ... The court interpreted the evidence of eyewitnesses and the postmortem report to affirm the conviction of one appellant while acquitting ... Having examined all the eyewitnesses even if other persons present nearby were not examined, the evidence of the eyewitnesses cannot be discarded. ... All the three eyewitnesses, PW 1, PW 2 and PW 3 are natural witnesses. ... Prosecution has also proved the signatu....

Soma Bas Mahali @ Soma Bans Mahali Son of Shri Dago Bans Mahali VS State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 971 India - Jharkhand

ARUN KUMAR RAI, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

(Paras 60-74) ... ... (C) Eyewitness Testimony - The court noted that while eyewitnesses were ... related to the deceased, their testimonies were credible and corroborated by medical evidence, despite minor contradictions. ... Further, this Court is conscious with the fact that all the said eyewitnesses are injured eyewitnesses as such their testimonies cannot be brushed aside lightly. ... We must now deal with the submission that all the accused cannot be convicted for murder with the aid of Section 149 IPC because th....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top