AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The main insight across these sources is that interest charged beyond statutory limits or contractual agreements is often deemed illegal or excessive. Courts tend to enforce the principle that excess interest must be refunded or offset against the principal. Statutory provisions, such as circulars prohibiting interest over 100%, serve as key benchmarks. The reforms under the Debt Redemption Act further influence how interest and principal are calculated and settled, emphasizing fairness and the reduction of usurious interest rates. Overall, borrowers have legal recourse to claim refunds for excess interest, and lenders must adhere to statutory caps to avoid legal penalties.

Search Results for "May be Interest Rate Excess from Principal Amount"

Sailendra Narayan Bhanj Deo VS Jagat Kishore Prasad Narayan Singh

1956 0 Supreme(Pat) 163 India - Patna

KANHAIYA SINGH, RAI

Fact of the Case: The plaintiff, as the executor and the principal legatee under the last will and testament of Chandreshwar ... Bihar Tenancy Act, is accountable to the mortgagor and that he is not entitled in law to remain in possession until the entire amount ... Any amount realised by the mortgagee byway of interest in excess of the statutory rate-shall be set off towards the amount of the principal. In csse the amount of #HL_....

Kartar Singh Alias Niranjan Singh VS State Of Punjab

1995 0 Supreme(SC) 396 India - Supreme Court

K.RAMASWAMY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, S.SAGHIR AHMAD

had deposited principal excess amount on February - District Judge by his order while upholding restitution of excess amount disallow ... on May – State therefore filed an application February for restitution of excess amount with interest payable thereon - Appellant ... excess amount realized in execution of decree of reference Court or appeal with interest - Granting of #HL_STA....

M. B. Gharpuray Engineers & Contractors VS State Of Bihar

2006 0 Supreme(Pat) 845 India - Patna

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH

The respondent-Corporation accepted the principal amount but disputed the claim of interest at the statutory rate. ... the amount to be paid within a week and the remaining half within a month. ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner filed a writ application seeking payment of the entire amount as per the arbitral ... Now the situation is that if the Corporation is to pay interest at the statutorily provided rate it may become sick o....

Sheo Balak and others VS Syed Mojiz Abbas

1973 0 Supreme(All) 143 India - Allahabad

SATISHCHANDRA, C.D.PAREKH

The mortgagors did not pay the amount. ... The Debt Redemption Act in reducing the rate of interest and in providing that the usufruct shall be calculated and its excess over the interest will be taken in satisfaction of the principal amount has in a way effected a revolutionary change in the terms of all subsisting usufructuary mortgages. ... Mona the predecessor-in-interest of the appellants before us. In 1944 the successors of the original mortgag....

SITA RAM SINGH VS GAYA PRASAD

1953 0 Supreme(All) 53 India - Allahabad

AGARWALA, CHATURVEDI

Fact of the Case: A usufructuary mortgage was executed in 1855, with a term that profits would be taken in lieu of interest ... The Debt redemption Act in reducing the rate of interest and in providing that the usufruct shall be calculated and its excess over the interest will be taken in satisfaction of the principal amount has in a way effected a revolutionary change in the terms of all subsisting usufructuary mortgages. ... The predecessors-n-interest#HL....

KUMARESAN Vs VILANANCHATHANOOR SERVICE CO-OP.BANK

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49926 India - High Court of Kerala

K.M.JOSEPH, J

Ratio Decidendi: The prohibition in Ext.P3 circular only applies when interest exceeds 100% of the principal; since the current ... interest is not excessive, the benefits were not applicable. ... Finding of the Court: The court permitted the petitioner to repay the loan in 7 equal monthly instalments with interest ... Learned counsel for Bank points out that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of Ext.P3 circular as prohibition in Ext.P3 is against the charge of rate higher than 100 % of th....

SREEKRISHNAN Vs VILANANCHATHANOOR SER.CO.OP.BANK

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49737 India - High Court of Kerala

K.M.JOSEPH, J

However, it allowed the petitioner to repay the entire amount in 7 monthly installments. ... rate applied. ... - Ext.P3 Circular: Reasonable Time and Installment Payment - The court interpreted the Ext.P3 circular's stipulations regarding interest ... Learned counsel for Bank points out that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of Ext.P3 circular as prohibition in Ext.P3 is against the charge of rate higher than 100 % of the principal amount and in this case interest....

MANIKKAN PILLAI Vs VILANANCHATHANOOR SERVICE CO-OP.BANK

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49912 India - High Court of Kerala

K.M.JOSEPH, J

Petitioner challenged demand notice - Ext.P3 Circular - Summary: The court evaluated the applicability of Ext.P3 circular concerning interest ... Whether the petitioner is entitled to the benefits stated in Ext.P3 circular concerning the repayment of a loan and the proper interest ... could repay the debt in manageable installments, denying the bank's claim that the circular's benefits were not applicable due to interest ... Learned counsel for Bank points out that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of Ext.P3 circular as prohib....

Board of Trustees VS Macgregor Navire Port Equipment A. B.

2008 0 Supreme(SC) 297 India - Supreme Court

TARUN CHATTERJEE, HARJIT SINGH BEDI

with interest, and the obligation to refund any excess amount paid to the bank. ... interest, and directed the parties to calculate and refund any excess amount paid by the appellant to the bank. ... Issues: Appellate jurisdiction, bank guarantee, payment obligation, interest calculation, refund of excess amount. ... Accordingly, the parties shall calculate the aforesaid sum with the aforesaid rate of in....

Indra Sekhar Chakravarty VS Raju Bala Haldar

1946 0 Supreme(Cal) 235 India - Calcutta

Finding of the Court: The court found that the principal of the loan should be considered as the amount stated in the ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amount stated in the mortgage should be considered as the principal of the loan, ... Final Decision: The court decided that the principal of the loan should be the amount stated in the mortgage, and a new decree ... Interest can only be calculated whatever may be adjudged to be the #HL_....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top