AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Allegation of Beating - The sources do not explicitly mention an incident of beating involving Mere Vegue. Instead, they focus on legal and procedural disputes, allegations of malafide, pressure, and corrupt practices. For example, Arun Jaitley's counter affidavit (01100016538) refutes allegations of malafide and coercion, stating such claims are false and unsubstantiated. The Division Bench upheld the nomination of a director, dismissing malafide allegations as vague AMARJIT KAUR VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi.

  • Legal Proceedings and Allegations - The other sources discuss allegations related to election support and corrupt practices. One source (00400006366) details accusations against a respondent for allegedly obtaining assistance from a gazetted officer to support her candidature, implying misconduct but not involving any physical assault or beating. Similarly, a case involving compensation for a deceased (01800000713) pertains to wrongful death claims, not violence or beating.

Analysis and Conclusion - Based on the provided sources, there is no evidence or mention of Mere Vegue being involved in or accused of beating. The references primarily revolve around legal disputes, allegations of malafide, election-related misconduct, and compensation claims, with no indication of physical violence.

Search Results for "Mere Vegue Allegation of Beating"

AMARJIT KAUR VS UNION OF INDIA

1990 0 Supreme(Del) 306 India - Delhi

S.B.WAD, USHA MEHRA

Arun Jaitley, Additional Solicitor General of India, has controverted all allegations of malafide and submitted that the allegation of pressure and threat for resignation were false and malicious, as stated in para 3 of the counter affidavit. ... The Division Bench further held that the allegations of malafide were too vegue and were not substantiated. The Division Bench, therefore, held that the said nomination of a Director cannot be faulted and cannot be reviewed judicially. ... DTC Mazdoor Congress pronounced on 4th ....

Sohan Singh Jodh Singh Kohli VS Chandrakanta Goyal

1990 0 Supreme(Bom) 416 India - Bombay

H.SURESH

In our opinion the aim of that section is to see that a person accused of so that he may have the opportunity to meet the allegation made against him. ... The allegations made in paragraphs 2, 5 and 6 of the petition, if read together do how that the allegation against the respondent is that she obtained the assistance of Yashpal Kapur, a gazeted officer, to support her candidature by organising her electioneering work. ... This has been pleaded in paragraphs 29 and 33 of the petition that the corrupt practice was committed by the person....

MILAP KAUR VS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

1987 0 Supreme(HP) 57 India - Himachal Pradesh

P.D.DESAI

Union of India and others, 1986 ACJ 69, which is a decision rendered in a suit tried by a learned Single Judge of this Court, the plaintiffs, who were the widow, children and parents of the deceased, had claimed total compensation in the sum of Rs. 7,10,000 on the allegation that the deceased had died ... The deceased might not have been able to earn till the age of retirement for some reason or other, like illness or for having to spend mere time to look after the family which was expected to grow. Thus the amount assessed has to be reduced taking into ac....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top