AI Overview...
-
MPS Greenery Developers Limited - The company has been involved in various legal proceedings, including disputes over property ownership, legal notices, and regulatory compliance. Several court cases reference MPS Greenery Developers in the context of property transactions, injunctions, and corporate disputes. Notably, in Calcutta High Court judgments (e.g., 2010 SCC ONLINE CAL 1717), the company’s legal standing and case details have been discussed Arnaud Descamps, S/o. Gilles Descamps VS Onmobile Global Limited, Represented By Its General Counsel Ms. N. S. Indira - Karnataka.
-
Regulatory and Legal Interactions - MPS Greenery Developers has corresponded with authorities such as SEBI and courts, submitting letters and affidavits related to impounding, asset identification, and compliance issues (e.g., letters dated 19/05/14 and 24/11/2010). The company has shown willingness to cooperate with investigations and asset management efforts SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA vs M/S. MPS GREENERY DEVELOPERS LIMITED AND ORS - Calcutta, MPS GREENERY DEVELOPERS LTD vs BHASKAR DAS GUPTA & ORS - Calcutta.
-
Court Proceedings and Asset Management - The company’s assets, including property deeds, have been subject to judicial scrutiny, with courts appointing trustees and committees for asset disposal and resolution of disputes (e.g., Calcutta High Court in MAT No. 559 of 2015). The courts have examined the company’s ownership claims and its role in ongoing legal matters INDHC_JHHC010365422018.
-
Property and Ownership Disputes - MPS Greenery Developers has been involved in cases concerning property rights, including conveyance deeds and possession claims. The courts have analyzed whether the company asserted ownership and possession over the properties in question, with some judgments indicating limited or contested ownership claims ABDUR ROUF vs LAKSHMI ASSET AND LAND LLP AND ORS - Calcutta.
-
Legal Principles and Case Law - The company’s cases have referenced principles such as the scope of appeals against injunctions and the interpretation of prima facie cases, emphasizing that initial legal assessments are based on arguable merits rather than conclusive proof Srijan Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs John Augustine - Calcutta, Arnaud Descamps, S/o. Gilles Descamps VS Onmobile Global Limited, Represented By Its General Counsel Ms. N. S. Indira - Karnataka.
Analysis and Conclusion:
MPS Greenery Developers Limited is actively involved in legal proceedings relating to property disputes, regulatory compliance, and asset management. The company has engaged with courts and authorities through various correspondence and legal actions, often focusing on ownership rights and asset disposal. Its legal history reflects a pattern of contested property claims and regulatory scrutiny, with courts emphasizing the importance of prima facie assessments and procedural correctness. Overall, MPS Greenery Developers appears to be a significant entity within ongoing legal and regulatory frameworks concerning property and corporate governance multiple references.
Search Results for "Mps Greenery Developers Limited"
2013 0 Supreme(Cal) 607 • India - Calcutta
SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, MURARI PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA
Kania and another, The Justice of the Peace for the Town of Calcutta versus the Oriental Gas Company Limited, Gourlal Mitra versus ... Chief Justice Sir Richard Couch, speaking for the Bench, in The Justice of the Peace for the Town of Calcutta versus the Oriental Gas Company Limited reported in XVII Weekly Reporter 384, inter alia, held that the expression ‘judgment’ in Clause 15 of the Letters Patent contemplated a decision affecting
2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 1850 • India - Calcutta High Court
th Spl. Court Kolkata, J
[copy whereof is annexed and marked “F” hereto us part hereof]; (13) Letter dated 19/05/14 by MPS Greenery Developers Ltd. through accused no.1 to SEBI agreeing to the impounding by the authorities in compelling circumstances stated therein. ... No. 27927(W) at 2012); (7) Letter dated 24.11.2010 by MPS to L.R. ... As Trustee executed and duly read on 16/06/2010 [copy whereof is annexed and marked “P-49” page 601 of WP No. 27027(W) of 2012]; (5) Letter dated 08.09.2010 by SEBI to MPS intimating that the....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 5552 • India - Calcutta High Court
Greenery Developers Ltd. ... Learned counsel appearing for the CBI hands over a compact disc containing a list of all the depositors of MPS Greenery Developers Limited to Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the One Man Committee. Mr. ... Banerjee, learned counsel appearing for the MPS Greenery Developers Limited submits that the company is ready to assist the One Man Committee to identify the names and number....
• India - High Court of Jharkhand - Principal Bench Jharkhand
Greenery Developers of Hon’ble Justice Manjula Chellur and Hon’ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi of Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in MAT No. 559 of 2015, the title deeds of MPS ... Sailendra Prasad Talukdar former Judge of Calcutta High Court for the purpose of disposing all the assets i.e. movable and immovable belonging to the MPS
2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 831 • India - Calcutta High Court
Arijit Banerjee, Om Narayan Rai, JJ
60) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The plaintiffs, representing the Indian Church Trustees, filed a suit against developers ... MPS Greenery Developers Ltd.), [(2010) 3 CHN 112 (Cal)] 70. ... Mitra also cited another Division Bench judgment in the case of Gloster Limited vs Bowreah Jute Mills Private Limited & Ors. ... It is equally well settled that the scope of an appeal against an ex parte ad interim order of injunction is limited only to the examination as to ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 1666 • India - Calcutta High Court
Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the primary reliefs sought in the suit is declaration that a registered deed of conveyance dated March 16, 2012 executed in favour of one MPS Greenery Developers Limited (respondent no.2), the predecessor-in- interest of the defendant ... There is precious nothing on record to show even prima facie that MPS Greenery asserted its ownership or ever was in possession of the suit property pursuant to the purported sale deed o....
2010 0 Supreme(Cal) 640 • India - Calcutta
PRABHAT KUMAR DEY, BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
Fact of the Case: Plaintiff, a limited liability concern with offices in Lake Town and Kolkata, maintained its principal ... Agencia Commercial International Limited & Ors. vs. Custodian of the Branches of Banco Nacional Ultramarino, reported in (1982) 2 SCC 482. Mr. ... Patel Roadways Limited vs. Prasad Trading Company & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 1541; ... 2. Chanana Steel Tubes Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s. Jaitu Steel Tubes Pvt. ... Harnam Singh and others reported in AIR 1955 SC 590 which was quoted with approval in the subsequent case of ....
• India - Current Civil Cases
BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, PRABHAT KUMAR DEY
Harnam Singh & Ors., AIR 1955 SC 590 which was quoted with approval in the subsequent case of trail Court in the case of Agencia Commercial International Limited & Ors. v. ... Agencia Commercial International Limited & Ors v. Custodian of the Branches of Banco National Ultramarino., 1982 (2) SCC 482. ... 11. Mr. ... The defendant has been described as a limited liability concern, incorporated in India under the Companies Act, having its Lake Town Branch Office at Manshabari, Block-B, Lake Town, Kolkata-700089 admittedly outside the jurisd....
• India - Calcutta
I.P.MUKERJI
MPS Greenery Developers Ltd. reported in 2010(3) CHN (CAL) 112, Athmanathaswami Devasthanam v. K. Gopalaswami Ayyangar reported in AIR 1965 Supreme Court 338, Calcutta Cosmopolitan Club Ltd. v. Bhanwarlal Bhandari & Ors. Reported in 2005 CWN 1191, and T.K. Lathika v. ... It states as follows:- ... "In view of order dated 10th January, 2014 passed by the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta and without prejudice, the banks right to recover its dues in respect of the credit facilities granted to Capricorn Oils Limited subsequent t....
2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 311 • India - Karnataka
H. P. SANDESH
MPS GREENERY DEVELOPERS LTD. reported in 2010 SCC ONLINE CAL 1717, wherein in Para No.3 of the judgment, it is observed that the word “prima facie” case does not mean a case proved to the hilt, but is one, which is at least “an arguable one” at the time of trial. ... MPS GREENERY DEVELOPERS LTD. reported in 2010 SCC ONLINE CAL 1717 and brought to notice of this Court Para No.3 of the judgment, wherein it is observed that the word “prima facie” case does not mean a case proved to the hi....
Filter by Legal Phrase
