References: - Murlidhar Vishnu Choudhari VS Chief Executive Office, Zilla Parishad and others - Bombay - Rohini Oomman VS Late Vishakha - Madhya Pradesh - GANESH VS MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD - Bombay - Vishnu Tiwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh - Murlidhar Genuji Tupe VS State of Maharashtra - Crimes - DR. MURLIDHAR @ MEHUL S/O. VISHNU ADWANI Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS P.S.O., NAGBHID P.S., - Bombay
Though in the case of Vishnu Murlidhar and ors. ... It was held in the case of Vishnu Murlidhar and Ors. ... The Nagpur High Court in the case Vishnu Murlidhar and ors. (1944 N.L.J. 264) did not fall within the definition of 'District Judge
This Court in Murlidhar Vishnu Khare v. M.S.E.B. Fort. Bombay, Spl. Civil Appln. No. 142 of 1974, decided on 13th August 1981. discussed this very point in details.
Approach road to their field is from the fields of Murlidhar, Dhondiba and Vishnu Ghule (A/1). ... The medical officer opined that injury Nos.1 to 3 of Vishnu and injury suffered by Mahesh can be self inflicted but injury Nos. 4 and 5 suffered by Vishnu cannot be self inflicted. ... On 2nd May, 2004 Tanaji (P.W.17) was examined. ... Sambhaji went inside the courtyard and accosted accused No.1 Vishnu. After Vishnu came out there was exchange of words between the two. Accused Nos.2, 3 an....
A suit was also filed against Murlidhar, Gopal Tiwari and Vishnu Tiwari for removal of their possession. ... During investigation, the aforesaid persons made a forged will dated 16.10.1960 by holding that Damodar Gungare had made a will in favour of Girdharilal and Purushottam Tiwari regarding the disputed house and according to which, aforesaid persons are the owners of the disputed house and Vishnu Tiwari
JUDGMENT Vishnu Sabai, J. - By means of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the Judgment dated 17th December, 1981 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No. 86 of 1981 ... In this connection, she invited our attention to the cross-examination of Ashok Tupe (paragraph 4) wherein he has stated that since the last two to three years, Murlidhar (appellant) was not allowing them to take water from the well. Mrs. ... The Police Patil found that Ganpat was lying on the ground and appellant Murlidhar was stand....
JUDGMENT ... Vishnu Sabai, J. - By means of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the Judgment dated 17th December, 1981 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No. 86 of 1981, convicting and sentencing him in the manner stated hereinafter - ... p align ... In this connection, she invited our attention to the cross-examination of Ashok Tupe (paragraph 4) wherein he has stated that since the last two to three years, Murlidhar (appellant) was not allowing them to take water from the well. Mrs. ... The Police Patil found that....
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.302 OF 2019 (DR MURLIDHAR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.