AI Overview...
-
Nahal Chand Laloo Chand Private Ltd. - Legal rulings emphasize that charges for stilt and open parking spaces are illegal when they contravene the Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act, 1995, and Supreme Court judgments, notably the case of Nahal Chand Laloo Chand Pvt. Ltd. Amanbir Singh Sarna VS State of Punjab - Consumer, A.S.Sarna vs State of Punjab - Consumer State, Awadhesh Kumar Agarwal vs Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd - Allahabad.
-
Court Judgments - The Supreme Court and other courts have consistently upheld that parking spaces, including basements considered part of common areas, cannot be arbitrarily charged for by developers or authorities, as established in Nahal Chand Laloo Pvt. Ltd. v. Panchali Co-operative Housing Society Limited (2010) 9 SCC 536. This case is frequently cited to support claims against illegal parking charges and to define the scope of common areas in property agreements Awadhesh Kumar Agarwal vs Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd - Allahabad, Mrs Sangeeta Tandon vs Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd - Allahabad, Usha Anandan VS V. J. Vikram - Consumer, USHA ANANDAN vs DR. V.J. VIKRAM & ANR. - Consumer National.
-
Legal Principles - The judgment underscores that any charges levied for parking must comply with statutory provisions and judicial directives. The law recognizes basement and parking areas as part of the common property, and charges for such spaces without lawful backing are unlawful Usha Anandan VS V. J. Vikram - Consumer, INDNCDRC_CC_876_2017.
-
Related Cases & References - The case of Oryx Fisheries Private Limited v. Union of India (2010) 13 SCC 427 reinforces that administrative orders affecting inter-party rights must be reasoned and lawful, aligning with principles laid in Nahal Chand to ensure transparency and legality in property-related charges Shivendu Shekhar Singh P D D No. 166764 and Ors vs The State Of Bihar and Ors - Patna, Manoj Ram and Ors vs The State Of Bihar and Ors - Patna.
Analysis and Conclusion
The collected judgments and legal references firmly establish that developers and authorities cannot impose charges for parking spaces, including basements, that are classified as common areas under statutory law and Supreme Court rulings, particularly the Nahal Chand Laloo Chand Pvt. Ltd. case. Any such illegal charges violate the Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act, 1995, and judicial directives, and can be challenged in courts for unlawful collection.
Search Results for "Nahal Chand Laloo Chand Private Ltd"
• India - Consumer
GURCHARAN SINGH SARAN, RAJINDER KUMAR GOYAL
Chand Laloo Chand Private Limited vs. ... Laloo Chand Private Limited vs. ... of the CP Act, the Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act, 1995, and the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Nahal Chand ... The OP is illegally charging for stilt and open parking spaces, which is in contravention to the Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act, 1995 and the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Nahal #....
• India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
The Op is illegally charging for stilt and open parking spaces, which is in contravention to the Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act, 1995 and the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ‘Nahal Chand Laloo Chand Private Appeal Nos. 2544 of 2010 with Nos. 2449 and 2456 and 2545-48 of 2010.
• India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Ltd. and others Civil Appeal No.6239 and 6303 of 2019. In support of his submission with regard to the provisions of the Lucknow Development Authority he has relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Nahal Chand Laloo Pvt. Ltd. ... 02.Nahal Chand Laloo Pvt. Ltd. V/s Panchali Co-operative Housing Society Limited (2010) 9 SCC 536. 03.Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Limited V/s Govindan Raghavan and o....
• India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
02.Nahal Chand Laloo Pvt. Ltd. V/s Panchali Co-operative Housing Society Limited (2010) 9 SCC 536. 03.Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Limited V/s Govindan Raghavan and others in Civil Appeal No. 12238 of 2018 and 1677 of 2019. ... Ltd. and others Civil Appeal No.6239 and 6303 of 2019. In support of his submission with regard to the provisions of the :7: Lucknow Development Authority he has relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Nahal #HL_ST....
• India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Nahal Chand Laloo Pvt. Ltd. V/s Panchali Co-operative Housing Society Limited (2010) 9 SCC 536. Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Limited V/s Govindan Raghavan and others in Civil Appeal No. 12238 of 2018 and 1677 of 2019. ... In support of his submission with regard to the provisions of the :8: Lucknow Development Authority he has relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Nahal Chand Laloo Pvt. Ltd. ... In t....
• India - Consumer
A. P. SAHI
Learned Counsel has alleged that the Judgment in the case of Nahalchand Laloochand Private Ltd. ... Learned counsel has advanced another submission contending that the basement forms part of the common area and is included in terms of the agreement as also in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Nahal Chand Laloo Chand Pvt. Ltd. Vs.
2024 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 133 • India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Learned Counsel has alleged that the Judgment in the case of Nahalchand Laloochand Private Ltd. ... Learned counsel has advanced another submission contending that the basement forms part of the common area and is included in terms of the agreement as also in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Nahal Chand Laloo Chand Pvt. Ltd. Vs.
• India - Patna High Court - Principal Bench Patna
690 (Oryx Fisheries Private ... Chand, P.S. Chand, Block- Chand, Distt- Kaimur (Bhabhua). ... Chand Block- Chand, Distt- Kaimur (Bhabhua). 61. ... Ramesh Chand Mishra, S/o. Late Shiv Chand Misra, Q.- B.A. Vill+PO.- Nvada, PS.- Bahera, Dist- Darbhanga. ... Laloo Prasad Yadav son of Brijbihari Rai At+P.O.-Kanchnar P.S.-Ravilganj, Dist.
• India - Patna High Court - Principal Bench Patna
Learned counsel has next referred to a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in (2010) 13 SCC 427 (Oryx Fisheries Private Limited vs. Union of India) to submit that orders determining inter-party rights has to be backed by reasons. ... (7) (2007) 1 SCC 408 (Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Workmen). ... Chand, P.S. Chand, Block- Chand, Distt- Kaimur (Bhabhua). 60. Devant Singh, S/o Rambriksh Yadav, Resident of Village- Naubant, P.O. Kuddi, P.S. Chand Block- Chand#....
• India - Patna
690 (Oryx Fisheries Private ... Chand, P.S. Chand, Block- Chand, Distt- Kaimur (Bhabhua). ... Chand Block- Chand, Distt- Kaimur (Bhabhua). 61. ... Ramesh Chand Mishra, S/o. Late Shiv Chand Misra, Q.- B.A. Vill+PO.- Nvada, PS.- Bahera, Dist- Darbhanga. ... Laloo Prasad Yadav son of Brijbihari Rai At+P.O.-Kanchnar P.S.-Ravilganj, Dist.
