AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • No Evidence or Irrelevant Evidence - Main points and insights
  • Evidence must be relevant to the issues at hand in family law and judicial proceedings, as emphasized by Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. Courts are mandated to confine their consideration to pertinent facts, avoiding irrelevant materials that could distort conclusions AJITH KUMAR.M.K vs PRASEETHA AJITH - Kerala.
  • Courts uphold findings based on genuine and sufficient evidence, rejecting claims supported by irrelevant or inadequate proof. For instance, in tenancy disputes, the landlord’s need is deemed genuine when supported by proper evidence, and courts will not interfere if the evidence is sufficient and relevant [ANAND KUMAR VERMA
    VS IV ADDL DISTT JUDGE SAHARANPUR
  • Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500042185).
  • In criminal and procedural contexts, the character of an accused or complainant is generally irrelevant under the Evidence Act, focusing instead on the admissibility and relevance of testimonies and documents. Courts avoid considering irrelevant character evidence, especially in sensitive cases like rape or attempt to rape, to maintain fairness Gopalakrishna Lakanidhi VS Union of India - Andhra Pradesh.
  • Administrative tribunals and courts are expected to base their decisions on relevant evidence. If a tribunal acts on irrelevant material or disregards relevant evidence, its findings can be challenged and quashed, emphasizing the importance of proper evidentiary consideration Akkabar Ali @ Aliakbar VS Union of India - Gauhati.
  • Interference by higher courts is permitted if decisions are based on no evidence or rely on irrelevant evidence, which renders the findings perverse or arbitrary. Courts are cautious to ensure that decisions are grounded in material evidence and not extraneous considerations S. Sivan VS Presiding Officer, II Additional Labour Court, Represented by its Chief Executive - Madras.
  • The Supreme Court and other judicial authorities have directed that courts cannot re-appreciate evidence or interfere unless there is clear evidence of irregularity, irrelevant considerations, or lack of evidence supporting the decision. This reinforces the principle that only relevant, legally admissible evidence should influence judgments Ibrahimkhan Jamalkhan Pathan VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat.
  • Disciplinary and administrative proceedings must be based on evidence free from irrelevant considerations. Findings based on irrelevant evidence or arbitrary conclusions can be challenged and set aside to uphold principles of natural justice Shrish Kumar Rangrao Patil VS State of Maharashtra and others - Bombay.
  • In caste recognition and related issues, courts rely on oral and documentary evidence, but the evidence must be relevant; reliance on irrelevant materials can lead to quashing of orders or decisions RASHEED AHMAD VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad.
  • Courts exercise caution to avoid re-evaluating evidence already considered by authorities unless there is clear evidence that the decision was based on irrelevant material or lacked evidentiary support. This preserves judicial efficiency and respects the findings of quasi-judicial bodies Narendra Kumar Sinha VS Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank - Patna.
  • In criminal cases, such as possession of contraband, independent corroborative evidence is not always necessary if the official evidence is relevant and credible. The focus remains on whether the evidence is relevant and legally obtained, rather than on extraneous factors SMT.JATOTH RAMILEE Vs THE STATE OF A.P. - Telangana.

  • Analysis and Conclusion

  • The overarching principle is that evidence must be relevant, legally admissible, and directly related to the issues in dispute. Courts are vigilant against the use of irrelevant or extraneous evidence, which can lead to perverse or unjust decisions.
  • Judicial authorities are tasked with ensuring that decisions are based solely on pertinent facts and not influenced by irrelevant considerations, maintaining fairness and adherence to legal standards.
  • Interference with decisions based on relevant evidence is generally restricted, emphasizing the importance of proper evidentiary evaluation at every stage of judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings.
  • Overall, the emphasis is on the integrity of the evidentiary process, ensuring that only pertinent facts influence judgments, thereby safeguarding the principles of natural justice and the rule of law.

Search Results for "No Evidence or Irrelevant Evidence 226"

AJITH KUMAR.M.K vs PRASEETHA AJITH

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1983 India - High Court of Kerala

AMIT RAWAL, C.S. Sudha, JJ

Evidence - Family Law - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Exclusion of Irrelevant Evidence In Family Court Proceedings ... 226, emphasizing the necessity of evidence being pertinent to the issues at hand, thereby influencing the court's ruling on the ... Ratio Decidendi: The ruling establishes that evidence must be confined to the factual issues at hand in family law matters ... After the close of the evidence of the respondent/wife, the ma....

ANAND KUMAR VERMA  
 VS IV ADDL DISTT JUDGE SAHARANPUR

1998 0 Supreme(All) 683 India - Allahabad

SHITLA PRASAD SRIVASTAVA

Whether the tenant had provided sufficient evidence to rebut the landlord's claim. ... upheld the lower courts' findings, holding that the landlord's need was genuine and that the tenant had not provided sufficient evidence ... Decidendi: The court held that the landlord's need for the accommodation was genuine and that the tenant had not provided sufficient evidence ... cannot be interfered with under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the finding of fact is not based on flimsy evidence or #H....

Gopalakrishna Lakanidhi VS Union of India

2001 0 Supreme(AP) 322 India - Andhra Pradesh

S.B.SINHA, S.R.NAYAK

interest litigation - According to petitioner character of an accused becomes irrelevant in terms of the evidence Act whereas the ... 54 and 155 (4) - Article 234 , 14 , 141 , 21 , 226 , 142 , - Publication - Circumstances Evidence - Testimonoy of Prosecutrix - ... Criminal procedure Code 1973 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 179 and 110 - Indian Evidence Act - Sections ... in the Indian evidence Act so that the character of a woman upon whom rape or attempt to rape is ....

Akkabar Ali @ Aliakbar VS Union of India

2017 0 Supreme(Gau) 746 India - Gauhati

UJJAL BHUYAN, KALYAN RAI SURANA

or that the Tribunal acted on irrelevant materials or failed to consider relevant evidence – As noticed above, the conclusion returned ... copies of certain documents disputing the allegation made and claiming to be an Indian citizen by birth – He also adduced oral evidence ... a Foreigners Tribunal unless it can be demonstrated that the proceedee was not served notice or that the finding is based on no evidence ... the finding is based on no evidence or that the Tribunal acted on irrelevant#H....

S.  Sivan VS Presiding Officer, II Additional Labour Court, Represented by its Chief Executive

India - Madras

A.P.SAHI, SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

, relies on irrelevant evidence, or disregards material evidence, making it perverse. ... Finding of the Court: The Court found that the Labour Court's award was based on no evidence and was perverse, leading ... Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that interference with the Labour Court's award is permissible if it is based on no evidence ... Nevertheless, such award can be interfered with if it is based on no evidence or if irrelevant evidence was r....

Ibrahimkhan Jamalkhan Pathan VS State of Gujarat

2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 103 India - Gujarat

A.S.SUPEHIA

and reliability of evidence - Supreme Court has also directed that Court cannot interfere, if there is some legal evidence, on which ... and 227 of Constitution of India, cannot appreciate evidence or interfere with conclusion, in inquiry and go into adequacy of evidence ... of principles of natural justice - It is also not found by this Court that authorities have held themselves to be influenced by irrelevant ... As held by the Supreme Court, this Court, while exercising the powers under Articles #HL_....

Shrish Kumar Rangrao Patil VS State of Maharashtra and others

India - Bombay

or influenced by irrelevant consideration or where the conclusion on the very face of it, is so arbitrary and capricious that no ... Articles 311 and 226-Disciplinary proceedings-Finding recorded by inquiring officer based on evidence-High Court cannot function ... recorded by the Enquiry Officer when the findings are based on the evidence.

RASHEED AHMAD VS STATE OF U. P.

2009 0 Supreme(All) 2550 India - Allahabad

JANARDAN SAHAI, ABHINAVA UPADHYA

[Evidence Act, 1872—Section 13—Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—Section 11—Constitution of India—Article 226]. ... on that issue if it is recorded on basis of irrelevant materials—High Court, therefore, quashing order of Tahsildar, cancelling ... under Section 13 of Evidence Act, as recognition of caste—However, it is not determinative of right of parties—High Court in exercise ... In the absence of documentary evidence about the petitioner’s caste the question could only be decided on the basis of oral #H....

Narendra Kumar Sinha VS Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank

2021 0 Supreme(Pat) 1097 India - Patna

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

/ materials on record or same has been arrived at by taking into account irrelevant materials leaving out relevant once, Court, exercising ... function – However, if a challenge is posed to such finding on the ground that same is without evidence or contrary to evidence ... of Constitution of India should normally not re-appreciate evidence already appreciated by authorities exercising quasi judicial ... However, if a challenge is posed to such finding on the ground that the same is without evidence or ....

SMT.JATOTH RAMILEE Vs THE STATE OF A.P.

2023 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 8442 India - High Court for State of Telangana

K.SURENDER, J

OF PANCHAS - IRRELEVANT Fact of the Case: The petitioner was convicted for possession of 226 polythin covers containing ... Issues: Whether independent evidence is necessary to corroborate the evidence of excise officials in a prosecution for possession ... POSSESSION OF LIQUOR - AP PROHIBITION ACT, 1995 - SECTION 8(B)(XII) - INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE - CORROBORATION - NOT NECESSARY - HOSTILITY

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top