AI Overview...
- Case No. 6066/2016 - Main Points and Insights:
- The case involves a writ petition (WP(C) No. 6066/2016) filed against an order dated 09.09.2016, which related to an inquiry that led to the respondent company's Holiday status and invocation of a bank guarantee. The respondents challenged this order, indicating procedural or substantive issues with the inquiry process OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED VS ASSAM PETROLEUM LIMITED - Gauhati.
- The petitioner in Crl.M.C No.6066/2016 was accused No.6 in C.C No.2872/2014, involving allegations of illegal money lending and repayment issues, with charges under criminal law. The case was handled by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Thiruvananthapuram SURESH KUMAR vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala.
- The total outstanding amount as of February 3, 2016, was Rs.55,01,217, indicating financial disputes possibly linked to the case or related proceedings M/S AGRITZ vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK - Kerala.
- In another legal context, a 2016-2017 audit report was set aside by a Minister in charge, with directions for a fresh audit, reflecting administrative or financial oversight issues involving the same case number 6066/2016 Chandramohan Dubey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh.
- A service-related dispute involved a memo dated 24.11.2016, treating 6066 days as unauthorized absence, impacting gratuity and service continuity, suggesting procedural or disciplinary proceedings associated with case number 6066 Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation VS Jivanlal Chhaganlal Vaghela - Gujarat.
-
The case also appears in civil proceedings, such as Special Civil Application No. 6066 of 2010, and in civil revision petitions (CRP), where orders related to case 6066/2016 were challenged or considered, indicating ongoing civil litigation involving the same case number Kalyani Roshanali Abdulla VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat, M/S BANGALORE SOFT DRINKS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs M/S KRISHNA SHELTERS PRIVATE LIMITED - Karnataka.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- Case 6066/2016 encompasses multiple legal dimensions, including administrative orders, criminal proceedings, financial disputes, and civil litigation. The core issues involve procedural challenges to inquiries, financial liabilities, disciplinary actions, and judicial review of administrative decisions.
- The consistent reference to case number 6066 across different contexts suggests it is a significant case with ongoing legal proceedings, involving both civil and criminal aspects, and administrative challenges.
- The case exemplifies complex multi-faceted litigation typical in administrative, criminal, and civil law intersections, requiring careful consideration of procedural fairness, financial accountability, and legal rights.
References: - OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED VS ASSAM PETROLEUM LIMITED - Gauhati - Mr. A.Arulraj, Vs The President-Executive - Madras - M.A.M.R.Muthiah vs K.Muthuvelliyan - Madras - SURESH KUMAR vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala - M/S AGRITZ vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK - Kerala - Chandramohan Dubey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh - Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation VS Jivanlal Chhaganlal Vaghela - Gujarat - Kalyani Roshanali Abdulla VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat - M/S BANGALORE SOFT DRINKS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs M/S KRISHNA SHELTERS PRIVATE LIMITED - Karnataka
Search Results for "O s no 6066 2016"
2018 0 Supreme(Gau) 213 • India - Gauhati
PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
Prior to that the present respondents preferred WP (C) No. 6066/2016 against the present petitioners, as the respondents. In the said writ petition, the respondents assailed the impugned order dated 9.9.2016 issued vide letter No. ... A challenge in the WP (C) No. 6066/2016, as per the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents was found to the extent of the act of causing the enquiry in order to put the respondent company on “Holiday” and act of invoking the Bank guarantee. ... DLI/ CHMM/ Q&....
2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 36698 • India - Madras High Court
W.P.No.6801 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.6066 of 2016 A.Arulraj ... ... vaan W.P.No.6801 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.6066 of 2016 Dated: 4.1.2023 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6801 of 2016 2. ... 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6801 of 2016 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. ... W.P.No.6801 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COU....
2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 16153 • India - High Court of Madras
P.VELMURUGAN, J
The revision petitioner is A1 in C.C.No.6066 of 2016. The respondent herein filed a complaint under Section 200 and 190 of Cr.P.C . and Sections 438 and 442 of BNSS, against the order dated 16.12.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.717 of 2019 in C.C.No.6066 of 2016 on the file of the XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-15. ... The revision petitioner/A1 thereafter approached the Metropolitan Magistrate by filing petition for dropping the proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.717 of 2019 in C.C.No.6066 of 201....
2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37395 • India - High Court of Kerala
A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J
The total outstanding amount as of 03.02.2016 is stated to be Rs.55,01,217/-.
2017 0 Supreme(MP) 403 • India - Madhya Pradesh
SUBODH ABHYANKAR
2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 46102 • India - High Court of Kerala
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
The petitioner in Crl.M.C No.6066/2016 is accused No.6 in C.C No.2872/2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Thiruvananthapuram and the petitioner in Crl.M.C No.6043/2016 is the 17th accused in the above case. ... The petitioner in Crl.M.C No.6066/16 is charged with an allegation that, he lend around Rs.26,90,000/- to CW1 without any licence for money lending and Rs.5,00,000/- was returned to the petitioner. ... Sub Inspector of Police, Kothamangalam Police Station [2016 KHC 1....
2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 26621 • India - High Court of Madhya Pradesh
SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA, J
From the narration of submissions before this Court, it appears that on 31 May 2021, the Minister in- charge of the Co-operative department has set aside the audit report while directing a fresh audit report for 13 MCRC No.6066/2024 2016-2017 and 2017-2018. ... The only expression used by the Division Bench in disposing of the 7 MCRC No.6066/2024 writ petition is “on due consideration”. ... It was fairly conceded that since 9 MCRC No.6066/2024 registration is required for transfer of ownership which is valuable right of ....
2020 0 Supreme(Guj) 17 • India - Gujarat
VIKRAM NATH, A.J.SHASTRI
It appears that at the fag end of service, a memo was issued on 24.11.2016, wherein the appellant treated a period of 6066 days as unauthorized absence and break in service as contemplated under Section 2-A of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. ... A bare reading of the impugned action reflected from the communication dated 24.11.2016 (page-26) indicated that if the period of 6066 days is to be treated as unauthorized absence then, there is no sanctity to the recalling of punishment and substitution of the same by stoppa....
2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 1375 • India - Gujarat
K.M.THAKER
... 3.0 Special Civil Application No. 6066 of 2010 to be listed for hearing on 11.01.2013." ... 7. According to Mr.
• India - High Court of Karnataka
S.G.PANDIT
The petitioner and the respondent herein are the defendant and plaintiff, respectively in O.S.No.6066/2016 and they would be referred to as they stand before the trial Court. ... /2016 ON THE FILE OF THE LXI ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, REJECTING THE IA NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (b) OF CPC. ... 2 THIS CRP FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04/09/2018 PASSED ON I.A.NO.II IN O.S.NO. 6066 ... COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, T....
Filter by Legal Phrase
