AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion

The provided sources collectively depict Pandit D. P. Mishra as a significant political figure involved in speeches, administrative decisions, legal proceedings, and controversies during the late 1940s and subsequent years. Notably, his speech on Indian Independence was scrutinized in the press, leading to legal debates on freedom of expression. Additionally, Mishra was involved in various legal cases concerning administrative and governmental functions, including eviction from official residence and land policies. These references portray a figure engaged in both political advocacy and administrative challenges, with ongoing legal and procedural considerations shaping his public and official life.

References:
- SHRADDHA KUMARI VS LUCKNOW UNIVERSITY - Allahabad, T B HAWKINS VS PANDIT D P MISHRA - Nagpur, T B HAWKINS VS D P MISHRA - Nagpur, Ajeet Chaudhary VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Bhushan Steel Limited VS Paradip Port Trust - Orissa, E. Tech Projects Private Limited VS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Department of Housing & Environment - Chhattisgarh, In Re VS State Of Bihar - Patna, NISHAT SULTANA ZAIDI VS RAM MANOHAR LOHIA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW - Allahabad, SATISH KUMAR VS STATE - Delhi, PRAKASH VIR SHASTRI VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi

Search Results for "Official Pankit Mishra Latest"

SHRADDHA KUMARI VS LUCKNOW UNIVERSITY

1984 0 Supreme(All) 234 India - Allahabad

K.N.GOYAL, R.C.DEO SHARMA, SHARMA

- Petitioner's Official Residence - Eviction - Validity. ... Whether the petitioner could be evicted from her official residence. Ratio Decidendi: 1. ... The recommendation to evict the petitioner from her official residence was not valid as it was based on unsubstantiated complaints ... The committee accordingly suggested that the Executive Council may give her notice to vacate the University premises latest by 30th June, and to shift to her own residence. ... ... ( 31 ) THE other matter was the recommendation of the #....

T B HAWKINS VS PANDIT D P MISHRA

1948 0 Supreme(Nagpur) 130 India - Nagpur

HEMEON, HIDAYATULLAH

The incriminating news items purported to be the reports of a speech said to have been delivered by Pandit D. P. Mishra at Jubbulpore on the occasion of the first anniversary of Indian Independence, which fell on the 15th August 1948. ... It was directed against the Hon'ble Pandit D. P. Mishra, Home Minister, Central Provinces and Berar Government, and the editors and printers of two newspapers called the Hitavada and the Jai-Hind published at Nagpur and Jubbulpore, respectively. ... A similar application was made by Pow....

PRAKASH VIR SHASTRI VS UNION OF INDIA

1971 0 Supreme(Del) 51 India - Delhi

H.R.KHANNA, T.V.R.TATACHARI, S.N.ANDLEY, JAGJIT SINGH, HARDAYAL HARDY

The use of government aircrafts by the Prime Minister for non-official including election purposes is permissible if it is done in ... It found that the impugned orders and directions about the use of IAF aircraft by the Prime Minister for non-official including election ... The latest office memorandum incorporating the orders of the President was issued on August 17, 1968. ... Misra on behalf of respondent No. 7. ... In this connection we find that the affidavit of Shri Prabhu shows that only two out of those tours wer....

T B HAWKINS VS D P MISHRA

1948 0 Supreme(Nagpur) 129 India - Nagpur

HEMEON, HIDAYATULLAH

Mishra at Jubbulpore on the occasion of the first anniversary of Indian Independence, which fell on 15-8-1948. ... Mishra, Home Minister, Central Provinces & Berar Govt., & the editors & printers of two newspapers called the Hitavada & the Jai-Hind published at Nagpur & Jubbulpore respectively. The incriminating news items purported to be the reports of a speech said to have been delivered by Pandit D. P. ... The relevant portion of the news Item in the 'Hitavada' reads as follows: ... Another is the revealing story behind the scandalous ....

Ajeet Chaudhary VS State of U. P.

2021 0 Supreme(All) 4 India - Allahabad

AJAY BHANOT

In case, there is default on part of such official, the SSP/DCP/SP of the concerned district shall take immediate action in accordance with law against such erring official. ... Institutions have to upgrade with the latest technological developments. Fruits of technology have to be put in the service of the people. ... Zubair Khan, Shri Vinay Saran, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, learned counsel, Shri R.P.S. Chauhan, learned counsel, Shri Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel and Shri Raghu....

Bhushan Steel Limited VS Paradip Port Trust

2016 0 Supreme(Ori) 576 India - Orissa

VINEET SARAN, B.R.SARANGI

Annexure-D/1 was issued by virtue of notification issued on 04.08.2011 - "Authority" as defined u/s. 2 (aa) has not notified any rate in official ... The latest guidelines are formulated under the “Land Policy for Major Ports, 2010.” A copy of the Land Policy for Major Ports, 2010 is annexed herewith as Annexure-A/1.” ... Xxx xxx xxx ... “26. ... Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the Paradip Port Trust argued with vehemence stating that the entire action has been taken by imposing MGT being a part of Land Policy for Major Ports, 2010 ....

E.  Tech Projects Private Limited VS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Department of Housing & Environment

2018 0 Supreme(Chh) 238 India - Chhattisgarh

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL

authorisation with a specific area prescription of Raipur, Durg and Bhilai cities only - Said authorisation was kept on renewing and latest ... The said authorisation was kept on renewing and latest authorisation is valid up to 6-4-2018 in which the petitioner has made huge capital investment as per the guidelines of Central Pollution Control Board and also made huge investment for up-gradation as per the direction of respondent No.2 in the ... Section 6 of the Act of 1986 empowers the Central Government to frame rules to regulate environmental pollution a....

In Re VS State Of Bihar

1960 0 Supreme(Pat) 17 India - Patna

S.C.MISRA, K.SAHAI, H.K.CHAUDHURI

This proceeding has been started against Sri Basanta Chandra Ghosh, an Advocate of this Court, to show cause why he should not be committed for contempt of Court in respect of an article published in the latest morning edition of the Searchlight, a Patna daily, in its issue of March 8, 1959. ... As for the charge against Pandit M. S. M. ... Mishra, ILR (1949) Nag 640: (AIR 1952 Nag 259) to the effect that proceedings in contempt are in a special category and it is not necessary to follow the procedure for trial in a summons case following....

NISHAT SULTANA ZAIDI VS RAM MANOHAR LOHIA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW

2012 0 Supreme(All) 2820 India - Allahabad

SHABIHUL HASNAIN, UMA NATH SINGH

CW-7, Vishal Mishra too admitted that he did not see late Sahil Zaidi assaulting anyone. ... According to the report, Pallav, late Sahil Zaidi, Anurag, Anjul, Kanishik and Ankit Prakash were abusing and the other group of students consisting of Vishal Mishra and Shahank Singh were mere spectators. ... The second charge relating to the incident dated 12.10.2009 was held to be proved against petitioner’s late son alongwith six other students namely Vishal Mishra, Shanhak Singh, Pankaj Kumar, Anurag Singh, Ankit#H....

SATISH KUMAR VS STATE

2016 0 Supreme(Del) 1971 India - Delhi

G.S.SISTANI, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

Mishra who deposed regarding weapon of offence that the knife could have been used for the infliction of injuries and the torns clothes of the deceased also affirm the injuries on the body of the deceased. ... As per the latest nominal roll the appellant has undergone a period of 3 years and 5 months. We are of the opinion that the ends of justice would be met if we modify the sentence awarded to the appellant and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years. ... State (NCT of Delhi) reported in 2001 (59) DRJ 426, wherein this cou....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top