AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Spelling Corrections in Official Records - Correction of misspelled names or words in official records, such as registers or documents, can be allowed, especially when it pertains to clerical or incidental errors. The Supreme Court case (02500074719) allowed correction of a wrongly spelled name in a tabulation register, emphasizing that such corrections are permissible to prevent prejudice or misidentification ANIL KUMAR VERMA VS U. P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. - Allahabad.

  • Judicial Discretion and Error Correction - Courts have the authority to correct clerical errors or inadvertent mistakes in judgments or records to ensure justice. For instance, in correctional or procedural contexts, courts may permit amendments to avoid injustice or confusion, as seen in various judgments emphasizing the importance of accurate records ANIL KUMAR VERMA VS U. P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. - Allahabad, State of Karnataka VS Selvi J. Jayalalitha - Supreme Court.

  • Limitations on Corrections and Need for Proper Procedure - While corrections are allowed, they must be within the scope of incidental or clerical errors. Corrections that alter the substance of judgments or involve extraneous considerations are generally not permitted. Proper procedural safeguards and judicial discretion are necessary to prevent misuse LAXMAN KUMAR PRADHAN vs STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa.

  • No Automatic Allowance for Spelling Mistakes - The correction of spelling mistakes will not be automatically allowed if it involves substantive changes or affects the rights of parties. Each case requires careful consideration of whether the error is clerical or substantive. Courts tend to be cautious in allowing corrections that could impact the outcome of cases ANIL KUMAR VERMA VS U. P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. - Allahabad.

  • Judicial Approach to Errors and Fairness - Courts recognize that errors, including spelling mistakes, can occur and should be rectified to uphold fairness. However, corrections should not compromise the integrity of the record or judgment. Proper judicial procedures and criteria are essential to determine when correction is appropriate State of Karnataka VS Selvi J. Jayalalitha - Supreme Court.

Analysis and Conclusion:
Correction of spelling errors or clerical mistakes in legal records and judgments is generally permissible, provided the errors are incidental and do not alter substantive rights or judgments. Courts exercise caution to ensure corrections serve the cause of justice without undermining procedural integrity. Automatic correction is not guaranteed; each case is evaluated on its merits, emphasizing procedural safeguards and the nature of the error involved ANIL KUMAR VERMA VS U. P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. - Allahabad, LAXMAN KUMAR PRADHAN vs STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa.

Search Results for "One Acuused Spelled Worngly will Correction of Spelling be Allowed Judgment"

ANIL KUMAR VERMA VS U. P.  STATE INDUSTRIAL 		DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 		LTD.

2014 0 Supreme(All) 1245 India - Allahabad

ARUN TANDON, ARVIND KUMAR MISHRA

[Paras 248 to 377] ... Result; Petition Allowed. ... He tried to suggest that respondent No. 3 could come to know that his name has wrongly been spelled in the tabulation register of ... JUDGMENT ... Hon’ble Arun Tandon, J. ... This was allowed in part on 3 March 2014. The Supreme Court allowed the summoning of the entire record on 10 March 2014.

Kavita Bhargava D/o Shri Devkinandan Bhargava VS Registrar Examination, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur (Raj. )

2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 624 India - Rajasthan

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, SAMEER JAIN

correct answer - Even if answer could be more than one, candidates will have to select one which is more correct out of alternative ... being vague, incorrect and misleading or answer keys alleged to be incorrect - In some cases, objection was raised that more than one ... All recommendations made by Committee of Experts have been acted upon and decision to delete four questions and alter option in one ... The question req....

STATE OF U. P. AND OTHERS VS PAWAN KUMAR SINGH

2009 0 Supreme(All) 736 India - Allahabad

JANARDAN SAHAI, RAKESH SHARMA

about adoption of extraneous consideration and unfair process—Constitution of Enquiry Committee—Appointment of two of its members (one ... By that judgment the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petitions of the respondents against the order of the State Government ... The reason for spelling out an incidental power in a statutory provision is that the Legislature frequently does not legislate in ... It was held in ....

Subrata Roy Sahara VS Union of India

2014 4 Supreme 129 India - Supreme Court

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR

Pleadings not disclosing anything which could be assumed, as would humiliate or discomfort the Judges by putting them to shame – Correction ... demonstrating “bias” – Petitioner’s counsel, by his posturing antics aiming at bench-hunting or bench-hopping or bench-avoiding – Not allowed ... and 142 of the Constitution – Shows that counsel themselves not sure about maintainability of the petition – Petition questioning judgment ... C....

State of Gujarat VS Bilal Ismail Abdul Majid Sujela @ Bilal Haji

2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 1723 India - Gujarat

ANANT S.DAVE, G.R.UDHWANI

All these cases arise out of judgment and order rendered by learned Sessions Judge – Camp at Central Jail ... answered to extent of commuting death sentence to rigorous life sentence of convicts of Schedule-A of operative order of impugned judgment ... recorded by learned trial Judge under Section 302 read with Sections 120 offences of IPC qua 11 convicts of Schedule-A of impugned judgment ... custody and as to whether any one#HL_....

State of Karnataka VS Selvi J.  Jayalalitha

2017 4 Supreme 6 India - Supreme Court

PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, AMITAVA ROY

... The High Court allowed the appeals thereagainst and acquitted the ... furnish necessary scientific criteria for testing accuracy of his conclusions enabling the Judge/Court to form his/its independent judgment ... evidence accepted by trial court rejected perfunctorily by High Court, or crucial evidence ignored without any reason – If impugned judgment ... Furnish a free copy of the full judgment to the accus....

Kartar Singh: Kripa Shankar Rai VS State Of Punjab

1994 0 Supreme(SC) 1 India - Supreme Court

S.C.AGRAWAL, R.M.SAHAI, M.M.PUNCHHI, K.RAMASWAMY, S.R.PANDIAN

in High Court should stand automatically transferred - Court opinion in such cases accused should be provided a counsel of his choice ... file an appeal in High Court itself and in case an appeal against conviction is filed by the Government in Court appeal filed by accused ... and the payment of fee should be either made by State or if made by accused it should be reimbursed - Court to entertain an application ... to be present at that tim....

KARTAR SINGH VS State Of Punjab

1994 0 Supreme(SC) 333 India - Supreme Court

S.C.AGRAWAL, R.M.SAHAI, K.RAMASWAMY, M.M.PUNCHHI, S.R.PANDIAN

If the exercise of the power is allowed to be done once, may be conferred with judicial powers in a lesser crisis and be normalised ... If every such person aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Designated Court passed under any criminal law other than the TADA ... Special provisions are enacted in the Act with regard to the grant of bail and appeals arising from any judgment, sentence or order ... to be present at that time or is #HL_....

Kartar Singh VS State of Punjab

India - Crimes

K.RAMASWAMY, S.C.AGRAWAL, S.RATNAVAL PANDIAN, R.M.SAHAI, M.M.PUNCHHI

If the exercise of the power is allowed to be done once, may be conferred with judicial powers in a lesser crisis and be normalised ... If every such person aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Designated Court passed under any criminal law other than the TADA ... Special provisions are enacted in the Act with regard to the grant of bail and appeals arising from any judgment, sentence or order ... to be present at that time or is #HL_....

LAXMAN KUMAR PRADHAN vs STATE OF ORISSA

2024 Supreme(Online)(ORI) 4943 India - Orissa High Court

Murahari Sri Raman, J

compulsory retirement is limited to instances of mala fides, arbitrariness, or lack of evidence - The court cannot substitute its judgment ... After discussing various judgments, including the judgments referred to by us hitherto, the Court clarified and spelled out the circumstances ... A bona fide error may need correction and counselling. ... and they allowed the appeal of the State.

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top