Kavita Bhargava D/o Shri Devkinandan Bhargava vs Registrar Examination, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur (Raj. )

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 624

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, SAMEER JAIN
Kavita Bhargava D/o Shri Devkinandan Bhargava – Appellant
Versus
Registrar Examination, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur (Raj. ) – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate Mr. Vivek Joshi, Advocate with Ms. Preeti Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Arvind Kumar Arora, Advocate with Ms. Komal Kumari Giri, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena, Advocate Mr. Girraj P. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat, Adv. With Ms. Priya Pareek, Advocate Mr. Mahendra Singh Rathore, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Khandelwal, Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Kumar Jain, Advocate Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Advocate, Mr. Aamir Khan, Advocate and Mr. Giriraj Rajoriya, Advocate Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate with Ms. Gyamlani Neha, Advocate Ms. Bhavya Golecha, Advocate Mr. Vinodi Lal Mathur, Advocate Mr. Mohit Balwada, Advocate with Ms. Gayatri, Advocate Mr. R.K. Mathur, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar Avasthi, Advocate Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda, Advocate with Mr. Hemraj Rodiya, Advocate Mr. Bajrang Lal Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Satya Pal Poshwal, Advocate with Mr. Vinod Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Chandra Kant Chauhan, Advocate Mr. Saurabh Jain, Advocate with Ms. Shivali Katara, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Vishesh Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ravi Gupta, petitioner in person
For the Respondent:Mr. A.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Vishnu Kant Sharma, Advocate

ORDER :

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, J.

1. Petitioners, in this batch of petitions, call in question the correctness and validity of the merit list prepared after Preliminary Examination in the matter of selection to the post of Civil Judge Cadre. The petitioners had appeared in Preliminary Examination. After declaration of the result of Preliminary Examination on 11.01.2022 in the matter of recruitment to 120 posts of Civil Judge Cadre, notified vide Advertisement dated 22.07.2021, when model answer keys were published, inviting objections, the petitioners, as claimed by them, submitted objections. A Committee of Experts was constituted to examine various objections. The objections were with regard to either questions itself being vague, incorrect and misleading or answer keys alleged to be incorrect. In some cases, objection was raised that more than one answer keys are correct, yet there were cases where objection was to the effect that none of the answer keys are correct. All these objections were considered by the Committee of Experts constituted by the official respondents. While the Committee decided to delete four questions, objections with regard to other questions were overr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Raj) 624

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, SAMEER JAINKavita Bhargava D/o Shri Devkinandan Bhargava – AppellantVersusRegistrar Examination, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur (Raj. ) – Respondent

Cases Referred (15)

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, SAMEER JAIN
Kavita Bhargava D/o Shri Devkinandan Bhargava – Appellant
Versus
Registrar Examination, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur (Raj. ) – Respondent