AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion
Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC provides a flexible mechanism for courts to add or delete parties to ensure comprehensive and just adjudication. The key considerations are whether the party is necessary or proper and whether their presence will aid in a fair trial. The court's discretion is paramount, and such decisions should be guided by principles of fairness, necessity, and the interests of justice. The rule does not automatically entitle a party to be added; rather, it empowers courts to exercise judicial discretion judiciously to facilitate effective resolution of disputes Ekta Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Ltd. VS Estate of Late Ram Parichan Singh - Patna, Venkatasubbammal VS Kandasamy Raja - Madras.

References: - Ekta Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Ltd. VS Estate of Late Ram Parichan Singh - Patna - VINODINI GOVINDAN Vs LOLITHA - Kerala - Sundargarh Shramik Sangh VS The Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited - Orissa - Ramaswami Chettiar Minor By Next VS P. M. A. Vellayappa Chettiar - Madras - Anit Mittal VS Ramesh Chand - Punjab and Haryana - Satyabhama Jalan And Another VS Murli Manohar Jalan - Patna - Venkatasubbammal VS Kandasamy Raja - Madras - Lrs of Chandmal Through His Legal Representatives: Smt. Sushila VS Tejmal - Rajasthan - Ramaswami Chettiar, Minor By Next VS Roya Kanniappa Mudaliar And Ors. - Madras - T. Mohanraj VS Akila Thiruvidancore Siddha Vaidhya Sangam - Madras

Search Results for "Order 1 Rule 10 2 for Adding Party"

Ekta Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Ltd.  VS Estate of Late Ram Parichan Singh

2011 0 Supreme(Pat) 2385 India - Patna

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO

1 Rule 10(2) CPC in adding a necessary party or proper party in a proceeding. ... Necessary Party - Probate Proceeding - Indian Succession Act, Section 263, Section 283(3), Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC - The court ... The court emphasized the importance of safeguarding the interests of parties and the discretionary jurisdiction of the court in adding....

VINODINI GOVINDAN Vs LOLITHA

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 16599 India - High Court of Kerala

S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J

Impleadment - Civil Procedure - Code of Civil Procedure, Order 1 Rule 10(2) - This case discusses the criteria for adding a party ... The lower court denied her request, stating she was not a proper party. ... to a suit, highlighting that a party may be impleaded if their presence is essential for a fair adjudication, regardless of direct ... At any rate, according to the learned counsel for the plaintiff, the petitioner could not b....

Sundargarh Shramik Sangh VS The Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited

2005 0 Supreme(Ori) 91 India - Orissa

L.MOHAPATRA

CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10(2) - Addition of parties - Order passed by the Courts below adding the opposite Party ... No. 1 as a party to the suit stood confirmed by the Revi¬sional Court - Hon’ble Court held that the opposite party No. 1, though ... not a necessary party is a proper party and refused to interfere with the im....

Ramaswami Chettiar Minor By Next VS P. M. A.  Vellayappa Chettiar

1930 0 Supreme(Mad) 5 India - Madras

EDDY

Partition Suit - Trust Fund - Order 31 - Rule 5, Order 1 - Rule 10 (2) - C.S. ... No. 762 of 1926 - [Order 31, Rule 5, Order 1, Rule 10 (2)] - The court discussed the application of Order 31, Rule 5 and Order 1, ... Issues: The issues involved the application of ....

Anit Mittal VS Ramesh Chand

2016 0 Supreme(P&H) 828 India - Punjab and Haryana

DARSHAN SINGH

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the CPC, which allows adding a person as a party to a suit if their ... Mortgage, NPA - [Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC, Section 151, SARFAESI Act - Section 13(2), Section 14] Fact of the Case: The petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction against respondents No.1 & 2, claiming that ....

Satyabhama Jalan And Another VS Murli Manohar Jalan

1976 0 Supreme(Pat) 225 India - Patna

HARI LAL AGRAWAL

CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 - ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) - Addition of party - Conditions - Presence of the person sought to be added is ... the conditions laid down in Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, which requires the court to add a party only if ... Issues: Whether the court below erred in adding a party defendant without consi....

Venkatasubbammal VS Kandasamy Raja

1928 0 Supreme(Mad) 199 India - Madras

MADHAVAN NAIR

Court's Discretion - Adding Party to Suit - Exercise of Discretion under Order 1, Rule 10 (2), Civil P.C. ... Ratio Decidendi: The Court's discretion to add any party to a suit under Order 1, Rule 10 (2), Civil P.C. should be exercised ... Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition and set aside the order of the lower Court making the res....

Lrs of Chandmal Through His Legal Representatives: Smt.  Sushila VS Tejmal

2021 0 Supreme(Raj) 2027 India - Rajasthan

MANOJ KUMAR GARG

CPC - Rent Control - Order 1 Rule 10(2) - The court interpreted the provisions of Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC, emphasizing the necessity ... Issues: Whether the third party was a necessary party under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC in the eviction proceedings initiated by ... of parties for effective ad....

Ramaswami Chettiar, Minor By Next VS Roya Kanniappa Mudaliar And Ors.

1930 0 Supreme(Mad) 155 India - Madras

CURGENVEN

Appeal - Adding Parties to Suit - Order under Order 1, Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Code is not a 'judgment' within the meaning ... The plaintiff appealed against the order adding the applicants as party defendants. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the order adding a party to a suit is not a judgment as it does not put ... There is no disput....

T.  Mohanraj VS Akila Thiruvidancore Siddha Vaidhya Sangam

2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 1511 India - Madras

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, R.MAHADEVAN

a title adverse to that of defendant vendor will not be a necessary party - Let us consider scope and ambit of Order 1 Rule 10(2 ... - In exercising its judicial discretion under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of Code court will of course act according to reason and fair play ... ) CPC regarding striking out or adding parties - Said sub-rule is not about right of a non-#HL_....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top