In the complex world of banking and finance, a pari passu charge is a critical concept that lenders must grasp. It refers to a shared security interest where multiple creditors hold equal ranking claims over the same asset, typically without priority over one another. But what does this mean in practice for banking transactions? This post explores the legal implications, drawing from key Indian court judgments to help you navigate this terrain.
Whether you're a banker, borrower, or legal professional, understanding pari passu charges can prevent disputes and ensure smooth enforcement. We'll break down definitions, priority rules, and real-world applications based on established case law.
A pari passu charge (Latin for on equal footing) arises when multiple lenders agree to share security over a borrower's assets equally. This is common in consortium lending, where banks pool resources for large loans.
Without a formal agreement, courts strictly enforce first-in-time priority (first charge holder prevails) Avil Menezes VS Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 48.
Section 48 of the TP Act is foundational: Where a person pledges or transfers the same property to two or more persons separately, the first charge has priority unless a contract to the contrary exists. This principle applies to both movable and immovable assets Avil Menezes VS Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 48.
In one case, a bank lacking a formal pari passu contract was barred from SARFAESI proceedings under Sections 13(2), 13(4), and 13(9), as it didn't qualify as a first charge holder Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation vs Kotak Mahindra Bank - 2019 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 1787.
The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002 amplifies these implications for non-performing assets (NPAs).
Quote from judgment: Creditor who had not obtained first pari-passu charge and who holds only a second charge, cannot invoke Section 13(9) Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, Mahabubnagar Branch VS Kotak Mahindra Bank, Rep. by its Manager - 2019 Supreme(Telangana) 155.
In a multi-bank scenario, UCO Bank Consortium held the first pari-passu charge over movable assets. A respondent's claim failed due to no no-objection certificate from the prior holders, invalidating SARFAESI invocation Avil Menezes VS Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 48. The Adjudicating Authority's order was set aside, reinforcing TP Act Section 48 priority.
Complications arise in insolvency. Under Companies Act, 1956 Sections 529 and 529A, workmen gain a statutory pari passu charge over secured creditors' securities upon winding-up.
Illustration: If assets are sold pre-liquidation but undistributed when winding-up commences, DRT must distribute per Section 529A, treating workmen as secured creditors from the winding-up order date Bank of Maharashtra VS Pandurang Keshav Gorwardkar.
| Scenario | Ruling | Key Implication |
|----------|--------|-----------------|
| No formal deed | Second charge only; no SARFAESI standalone rights Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, Mahabubnagar Branch VS Kotak Mahindra Bank, Rep. by its Manager - 2019 Supreme(Telangana) 155 | Prioritize documentation |
| Pari Passu Deed exists | Proportional recoveries post-default notice Clearwater Capital Partners India VS Punjab National Bank - 2012 Supreme(Del) 1558 | Ensures equitable enforcement |
| Liquidation | Workmen pari passu with secured creditors Bank of Maharashtra VS Pandurang Keshav Gorwardkar | Plan for diluted payouts |
| Consortium dispute | First charge prevails sans NOC Avil Menezes VS Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 48 | Consent is king |
Pari passu charges promote collaborative lending but demand precision. Missteps can lead to lost priorities or stalled recoveries.
The implications of a pari passu charge in banking transactions hinge on formal agreements and statutory priorities. Indian courts consistently uphold TP Act Section 48 and SARFAESI safeguards, protecting first holders while mandating equity where agreed Avil Menezes VS Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 48.
This post provides general insights based on case law and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation, as outcomes vary by facts.
For more on banking law, stay tuned!
Livelihood is a matter of concern to the individual and his family as also a matter of public interest and in appropriate case public ... FROM LAWFUL DUTIES ... -held, public has a vital interest in efficiency ... good should prevail where taking away of livelihood provided by public exchequer, is in public interest. ... implication. ... ' and ....
render their direction susceptible to a charge of discrimination. ... consequences. ... any collateral-attack. ... repeal suggest that in view of the difficulties in determining whether an implication of repeal was intended in a particular situation ... render their direction susceptible to a charge of discri....
It was held that Section 48 of the Banking Act, 1945, prohibiting banks from conducting banking business for a State and for ... For a proper understanding of the provisions of Article 31-C, one must in the first place appreciate the full meaning and significance ... It will be legitimate to bear i....
Following the principle of interpretation that all words must be given its full effect, we must also give full effect to the words ... aforementioned reasons, we are in agreement with the findings of the High Court. ... It is well-settled that when a statutory authority is required to do a thing in a particular manner, #HL_STA....
was required in the interest of justice, and grave injustice would be occasioned if the time was not extended. ... in negative form, it does not specify any penal consequences flowing from the non-compliance. ... not in itself provide for penal consequences to follow if the time schedule, as laid down, is not observed. ... though they may be read by necessary implication. ... How....
various banks - Court found that no formal agreement for creating a first pari-passu charge in favor of the respondent existed, despite ... The main contention was whether a first pari-passu charge was ceded to Kotak Mahindra Bank without a formal execution of requisite ... (A) Securitisation and Reconstructi....
- Held, Creditor who had not obtained first pari-passu charge and who holds only a second charge, cannot invoke the Section 13 ( ... bank and created pari-passu charge in favour of both of them, over certain immovable properties - Petitioner Corporation exclusive ... 9) - 1st respondent cannot claim to be holder of first pari-....
, in violation of the Pari Passu Deed. ... any such adjustment must be in compliance with the terms of the Pari Passu Deed. ... Issues: The main issue was the interpretation of the Pari Passu Deed dated 22.08.2011, specifically regarding the calculation ......
Pari Passu Deed - Loan Agreement - 29.11.2011 - Summary of Acts and SectionsFact of the Case: The plaintiff filed ... Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation of the Pari Passu Deed, the calculation date, and the rights and obligations ... a suit seeking declaration of....
security of every secured creditor and this charge is pari passu with that of secured creditor—Such statutory charge is to the extent ... workmen—Where a company is in liquidation, a statutory charge is created in favour of workmen in respect of their dues over t....
Hence, it was submitted that the claim of pari passu charge is unsustainable in law and contrary to both the contractual understanding and statutory filings. ... 03/10/2012 extending pari passu charge. ... This letter is subject to receipt of similar letter from your bank ceding pari passu charge in our favour. ... We request to issue similar letter conceding pari passu #HL_START....
Hence, it was submitted that the claim of pari passu charge is unsustainable in law and contrary to both the contractual understanding and statutory filings. ... 03/10/2012 extending pari passu charge. ... This letter is subject to receipt of similar letter from your bank ceding pari passu charge in our favour. ... We request to issue similar letter conceding pari passu #HL_START....
passu in proportion to the amounts due to each of them”. ... No. 9 of 1969 batch already referred to, and direct the Official Liquidator to divide the sale proceeds pari passu between the two banks, namely, the appellant bank and the first respondent bank, in proportion to the amount due to each of them. ... We are therefore, constrained to presume in the instant case that all transactions made by the managing director which resulted in the pledge of the stock with two independent banking institutions w....
p>no. 1 Bank from the Defendant no. 2 in their business transactions which are entirely separate and distinct from the plaintiff‟s loan or loan transactions. ... The extracted notice reads thus: “we refer to the pari passu deed. Words defined in the pari passu deed shall have the same meanings when used herein. ... , the same shall be distributed amongst the lenders on pari passu or proportionate basis as per the clause. ... Until such time....
which are entirely separate and distinct from the plaintiff’s loan or loan transactions. ... ... The plaintiff is misinterpreting the terms of the pari passu deed by contending that pursuant to service of the notice dated 7.2.2012, it is entitled to receive a share from the monies received by the defendant no. 1 Bank from the Defendant no. 2 in their business transactions ... ... c) The defendant No. 1 may as per its own option allow to carry out and provide the working capital facilities, banking fac....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.