AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
A press conference or public speech, by itself, does not constitute an act of instigation unless it explicitly incites unlawful activity or violence. The judiciary emphasizes the importance of context, intent, and the distinction between protected speech and unlawful incitement. Therefore, conducting a press conference about a particular issue, without crossing into incitement, is not legally considered an act of instigation.

Search Results for "Press Confrence of doing a Particular Thing is Not an Instigation"

Express Newspapers Private LTD.  VS Union Of India

1985 0 Supreme(SC) 343 India - Supreme Court

R.B.MISRA, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, A.P.SEN

and Housing New Delhi - Said notice required petitioner Express Newspapers - New Delhi to show cause why Union of India should not ... between parties - These questions can be satisfactorily and effectively dealt with in properly instituted proceeding or suit and not ... which are so discrepant and contradictory in this case - Right to land and to construct buildings thereon for running business is not ... In substance, the submission is that the right to run a press may be a fundamental right guaranteed under Art. 19 (1....

Express Newspapers Private LTD.  VS Union Of India

1985 0 Supreme(SC) 344 India - Supreme Court

A.P.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, R.B.MISRA

TREAT TO FREEDOM OF PRESS - HOWEVER PRECIOUS AND CHERISHED THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS UNDER ARTICLE 19(i)(a)—THIS FREEDOM IS NOT ABSOLUTE ... ENOUGH - DISTINCTION BETWEEN EXERCISE OF POWER IN GOOD FAITH AND MISUSE IN BAD FAITH - WRIT PETITION ALLEGING MALAFIDES—IT IS NOT ... PUBLIC PREMISES - OCCUPATION — UNAUTHORISED - LEIUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI IS NOT SUCCESSOR OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF DELHI. ... for one particular case or building or for one particular commercial area. ... In su....

Employers Of Cinema Exhibitors Industry In West Bengal VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL

1983 0 Supreme(Cal) 246 India - Calcutta

B.C.RAY

The court held that the word 'shall' used in Sub-section (6) of Section 12 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is mandatory and not ... court interpreted the word 'shall' used in Sub-section (6) of Section 12 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as mandatory and not ... Where indeed the whole aim and object of the legislature would be plainly defeated if the command to do a thing in a particular manner did not imply a prohibition to do it in any other, no doubt can be entertained as to the intention. .....

ARNAB MANORANJAN GOSWAMI VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2020 6 Supreme 93 India - Supreme Court

stated that deceased left behind a suicide note stating that his money is stuck and following owners of respective companies are not ... meaning of Section 306 of IPC – If High Court were to carry out a prima facie evaluation, it would have been impossible for it not ... has been arbitrarily deprived of their personal liberty in an excess of state power – Appellants are residents of India and do not ... The first segment of Section 107 defines abetment as the instigation of a person to do a particular #....

DIGVIJAYSINHJI HAMIRSINHJI VS H. K. OZA

1965 0 Supreme(Guj) 5 India - Gujarat

J.B.MEHTA, J.M.SHELAT

From the words used in this letter it will be seen that no privilege was claimed in express terms and that the only thing that was stated was that the particulars were not required to be given to the petitioner. ... In Ashutoshs case the grounds of detention were that the petitioner went to Delhi on March 27 1950 held a press conference there in which he gave a highly exaggerated and communal version of events in Bengal and East Bengal. ... Sub-paras (1) to (11) thereof then deal with the part....

AMISH DEVGAN VS UNION OF INDIA

2020 0 Supreme(SC) 697 India - Supreme Court

A.M.KHANWILKAR, SANJIV KHANNA

registered first in point of time, should be treated as main FIR and others as statements under Section 162 of Criminal Code – Court do not ... Everyone is free to express their own particular convictions and adhere to it. ... This rationale does not grant protection to speech that is antidemocratic in general, and hateful or political extremist in particular. ... It was observed there was no proximate or even foreseeable connection between such instigation and the public order sought to be protected. .....

Rajendra Prasad: Kunjukunju Janardhanan: Sheo Shanker Dubey VS State Of U. P. : State Of Kerala: State Of U. P.

1979 0 Supreme(SC) 118 India - Supreme Court

A.P.SEN, D.A.DESAI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER

merit the extreme penalty – Court find that in the facts and circumstances of this particular case these factors cannot outweigh ... as a sufficient ground for awarding the lesser punishment – Court has to take into consideration all the circumstances which do not ... A paranoid preoccupation with the horror of the particular crime oblivious to other social and individual aspects is an error. ... in theory, comes to much the same thing. ... I think Evans case shows, in spite of all that has been done since, that a mistak....

State by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch, C. I. D. , Madras VS S. Thiunavukkarasu and another

1992 0 Supreme(Mad) 486 India - Madras

JANARTHANAM

I have been making speeches in public meetings, press conference and other public forum stating that the present Chief Minister has misused her official position in purchasing property from TANSI a State owned body. ... This power, clearly postulates that the investigation so long as it is in accordance with the provisions of law cannot be interfered with and it does not give immunity to investigation which is not in consonance with the relevant provisions of law governing the particular case or is in b....

Peary Mohan Das VS D.  Weston

1911 0 Supreme(Cal) 417 India - Calcutta

FLETCHER

The court held that the defendants' actions were not justified under the Explosive Substances Act, as the plaintiff was not in possession ... The court held that the defendants' actions were not justified under the Explosive Substances Act, as the plaintiff was not in possession ... of the bomb and the arrest was not based on reasonable suspicion. ... Now it is alleged by the plaintiff that the bomb was placed in his house by the boy Bonomali at the instigation of the Moulvi. 197. ... ....

Vinita Dattatraya Samant VS Commissioner of Police, Thane & others

1981 0 Supreme(Bom) 182 India - Bombay

D.M.REGE, D.N.MEHTA

In view of the fact that I have come to the conclusion that the grounds are vitiated by the vices of irrelevance and vagueness, I do not think it necessary to deal with the third ground relating to the Press Conference in which the Chief Minister is alleged to have made certain observations in respect ... At the time the speech was delivered by Shri Borade the detenu was not present. Neither the report of the speeches (Ex. 14) nor does not ground indicate that the speech of Borade even in inflamatory wa....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top