AI Overview...
-
Raghuvansh Dewachand Bhasin - Supreme Court Guidelines on Warrants and Caution in Issuance
The case of Raghuvansh Dewachand Bhasin vs. State of Maharashtra (2011, 2012) established that courts must exercise caution when issuing non-bailable warrants, emphasizing that such warrants involve a significant curtailment of personal liberty. The Supreme Court outlined specific guidelines to ensure the issuance is justified and not arbitrary, highlighting the need for careful judicial scrutiny Sunil Kumar Singh VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Md. Kudus Ansari VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Sunil Tyagi VS Govt Of NCT Of Delhi - Delhi, Sunil Tyagi VS Govt of NCT of Delhi - Delhi, Surjeet Kumar Jain S/o Shri Satish Kumar Jain VS State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Sarkanda Bilaspur - Chhattisgarh. -
Legal Precautions and Judicial Caution
The Court emphasized that issuing non-bailable warrants requires adherence to strict guidelines to prevent misuse and protect individual rights. The decision underscores the importance of judicial prudence in arrest procedures involving warrants Sunil Kumar Singh VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Md. Kudus Ansari VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand. -
Case of Alleged Crime and Defense
In cases involving criminal accusations, such as those against Devchand, the courts have examined pleas of alibi and the evidence presented. The trial courts often found the pleas unsubstantiated, affirming convictions and sentences, but also highlighted procedural concerns like the absence of clear findings on aggressors or injury causation DEVECHAND VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad, Devechand VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Crimes, [Devechand
VS State of Uttar Pradesh -
Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500040723).
-
Specific Reference to Devchand
Multiple cases mention Devchand's plea of alibi being rejected and his conviction upheld. The courts noted procedural errors but ultimately affirmed the conviction and sentence, with some cases noting that Devchand and co-accused Kewal remained on bail during appellate proceedings DEVECHAND VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad, Devechand VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Crimes, [Devechand
VS State of Uttar Pradesh -
Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500040723).
-
Broader Context of Personal Liberty and Judicial Oversight
The Supreme Court's rulings reinforce that arrest warrants, especially non-bailable ones, must be issued with caution, respecting constitutional protections against arbitrary detention. The case law serves as a reminder for courts to balance enforcement with individual rights Sunil Kumar Singh VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Md. Kudus Ansari VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Sunil Tyagi VS Govt Of NCT Of Delhi - Delhi.
Analysis and Conclusion
The case of Raghuvansh Dewachand Bhasin is pivotal in establishing judicial guidelines for issuing non-bailable warrants, emphasizing caution and adherence to procedural safeguards. It also illustrates the courts' approach to criminal defense, including alibi claims, and the importance of procedural correctness. Overall, these rulings reinforce the constitutional protections of liberty while balancing law enforcement needs Sunil Kumar Singh VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Md. Kudus Ansari VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Sunil Tyagi VS Govt Of NCT Of Delhi - Delhi, Sunil Tyagi VS Govt of NCT of Delhi - Delhi, Surjeet Kumar Jain S/o Shri Satish Kumar Jain VS State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Sarkanda Bilaspur - Chhattisgarh.
Search Results for "Raghuvansh Devachand"
2016 0 Supreme(Jhk) 481 • India - Jharkhand
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
State of Uttranchal, 2008(1) JLJR 82(SC), Raghuvansh Dewachand Bhasin vs. ... In the case of of Raghuvansh Dewachand Bhasin (supra), a note of caution was put that the courts have to be extra cautious and careful while directing issuance of non bailable warrant of arrest. ... In order to appreciate the rival contentions, it would be necessary to refer to the case of Raghuvansh Dewachand Bhasin vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. Reported in 2011 (4) JLJR 385(SC), wherein it was held as fol....
2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 250 • India - Jharkhand
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
In the case of “Raghuvansh Dewachand Bhasin Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.” reported in 2011 (4) JLJR 385 (SC), it was held as follows: ... “9.
2021 0 Supreme(Del) 2113 • India - Delhi
J. R. MIDHA
The warrant must be issued keeping in mind the guidelines framed by the Supreme Court in Raghuvansh Dewachand Bhasin v. State of Maharashtra (supra). 261. ... In Raghuvansh Dewanchand Bhasin v. State of Maharashtra , (2012) 9 SCC 791 , the Supreme Court issued the following guidelines: "28.
2021 0 Supreme(Del) 831 • India - Delhi
J.R.Midha
The warrant must be issued keeping in mind the guidelines framed by the Supreme Court in Raghuvansh Dewachand Bhasin v. State of Maharashtra (supra). 261. ... In Raghuvansh Dewanchand Bhasin v. State of Maharashtra , (2012) 9 SCC 791 , the Supreme Court issued the following guidelines: "28.
• India - Bombay
Mr.Raghuvansh ... The original plaintiff Mr.Raghuvansh Bhasin thereafter took out a chamber summons The facts that are material and relevant for deciding this by Ms.Sonia, which was the only caveat filed in the probate petition, the probate was granted in favour of Mr.Raghuvansh
2004 0 Supreme(All) 1056 • India - Allahabad
MUKTESHWAR PRASAD
W. 2 Raghuvash Bahadur, record keeper of the office of Superin-tendent of Police, Azamgarh and D. W. 3 Vishwanath Singh, advocate. ... The appellant No. 1 (Devchand) pleaded alibi but his plea was not accepted by the trial court. The trial Judge has further erred in not recording any finding as to who was aggressor and as to how injuries were caused to appellant No. 2 Kewal also. ... The conviction of the appellants (Devchand and Kewal) and sentence recorded against them by the trial court are hereby affirmed. They are on bail. Their bail....
• India - Crimes
MUKTESHWAR PRASAD
Accused examined D.W. 1 Pawaroo, D.W. 2 Raghuvash Bahadur, record keeper of the office of Superin-tendent of Police, Azamgarh and D.W. 3 Vishwanath Singh, advocate. 25. ... The appellant No. 1 (Devchand) pleaded alibi but his plea was not accepted by the trial court. The trial Judge has further erred in not recording any finding as to who was aggressor and as to how injuries were caused to appellant No. 2 Kewal also. ... The conviction of the appellants (Devchand and Kewal) and sentence recorded against them by the trial court are hereby....
2004 0 Supreme(All) 1066 • India - Allahabad
MUKTESHWAR PRASAD
W. 2 Raghuvash Bahadur, record keeper of the office of Superin-tendent of Police, Azamgarh and D. W. 3 Vishwanath Singh, advocate. ... The appellant No. 1 (Devchand) pleaded alibi but his plea was not accepted by the trial court. The trial Judge has further erred in not recording any finding as to who was aggressor and as to how injuries were caused to appellant No. 2 Kewal also. ... The conviction of the appellants (Devchand and Kewal) and sentence recorded against them by the trial court are hereby affirmed. They are on bail. Their bail....
2021 0 Supreme(Chh) 148 • India - Chhattisgarh
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Raghevansh Dewachand Bahasin vs. State of Maharashtra, (2012) 9 SCC 791 has held that the issuance of non-bailable warrant of arrest directly involves curtailment of liberty of a person.
2024 0 Supreme(All) 2057 • India - Allahabad
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
In Lallubhai Devchand Shah and others v. ... Raghuvans Singh on 24.7.1981 he had taken the rifle to the Forensic Science Laboratory. In the cross-examination, he had stated that he had not recovered the rifle from Musafir.
Filter by Legal Phrase
