AI Overview...
Rajarama Prasad Yadav Legal Proceedings: Insights from Key Court Cases
In the realm of Indian jurisprudence, certain names and cases stand out for their illustrative value in procedural law. Rajarama Prasad Yadav legal proceedings often intersect with advocates and judges bearing similar names, highlighting pivotal rulings on discharge applications, election petitions, criminal trials, and land revenue disputes. This blog post breaks down notable cases drawn from judicial records, offering clarity on how courts handle these matters. While these examples provide general educational insights, they are not legal advice—consult a qualified attorney for specific situations.
Understanding Discharge Applications under CrPC Section 245
One recurring theme in Rajarama Prasad Yadav legal proceedings is the rejection of discharge applications under Section 245 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973. In a key writ petition, the petitioner challenged the magistrate's rejection, arguing no reasons were recorded. The court clarified: The rejection of a discharge application under Section 245 Cr.P.C. does not require detailed reasoning; only a prima facie case must be established for proceeding Ramashray Yadav VS State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 2070.
Key Principles from the Ruling
- Prima Facie Standard: Courts need only find sufficient material to proceed to trial; detailed reasons aren't mandatory for rejection, unlike allowances which require justification (Paras 9, 10) Ramashray Yadav VS State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 2070.
- Article 227 Review: High Courts under the Constitution's supervisory jurisdiction won't interfere unless there's illegality. Here, the writ was dismissed, upholding the lower court's order.
- Case Facts: Involved a complaint of post-marital harassment; statements of complainant and PW-2 supported proceeding Ramashray Yadav VS State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 2070.
This ruling underscores that magistrates have discretion at the pre-trial stage, focusing on whether a case needs to be established for proceeding with the trial Ramashray Yadav VS State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 2070.
Criminal Cases and Evidence Standards
Several proceedings linked to similar names delve into criminal law, emphasizing evidence quality over quantity. In a dacoity case, the court scrutinized identification and recovery evidence: The court upheld the convictions of the other three accused under Section 412 IPC for receiving stolen property but set aside their convictions under Sections 396 and 397 IPC for dacoity and robbery, as the recovery of the stolen articles was not recent enough to invoke the presumption of guilt under Section 114 of the Evidence Act Mangaroo son of Ram Sakal (In Jail) VS State of U. P. - 2005 Supreme(All) 1585.
Lessons on Evidence and Conviction
- Identification Sufficiency: Convictions of two accused were set aside due to uncorroborated identification; witnesses hadn't named them earlier Mangaroo son of Ram Sakal (In Jail) VS State of U. P. - 2005 Supreme(All) 1585.
- Presumption Limits: Section 114 Evidence Act presumption doesn't apply to delayed recoveries (over a month) Mangaroo son of Ram Sakal (In Jail) VS State of U. P. - 2005 Supreme(All) 1585.
- Family Tragedy Facts: A nighttime dacoity in Deoria left family members injured and three dead, with P.W.1 Rajesh Kumar Shukla detailing the horror Mangaroo son of Ram Sakal (In Jail) VS State of U. P. - 2005 Supreme(All) 1585.
Another case reinforced: The quality of evidence is more important than the quantity of evidence, and a single reliable witness can be sufficient to prove the charges RAJPAL VS STATE OF U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 447. Here, injured witnesses' testimony led to life imprisonment under IPC Section 302 for murder RAJPAL VS STATE OF U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 447.
In a corruption scam involving Ghaziabad P.F. Fund, the court noted: material does disclose a prima facie case of involvement of accused-appellants and a case for they being summoned R. N. MISHRA (RETD. ) (JUSTICE) VS STATE OF U. P. - 2011 Supreme(All) 243, refusing to quash summons.
Election Petitions and Mandatory Compliance
Election law featured prominently, as in a challenge under Haryana Municipal Election Rules: Non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of depositing security along with an election petition, as prescribed under Rule 77... entails the dismissal Sugan Chand Saini VS Senior Sub Judge And Anr. - 1996 Supreme(P&H) 594. The tribunal erred by returning rather than dismissing the petition, barring a second filing on the same cause Sugan Chand Saini VS Senior Sub Judge And Anr. - 1996 Supreme(P&H) 594.
Procedural Safeguards
- Rule 79 Mandate: Automatic dismissal for non-deposit; no discretion Sugan Chand Saini VS Senior Sub Judge And Anr. - 1996 Supreme(P&H) 594.
- No Repeat Petitions: Subsequent filings on identical grounds are impermissible.
Civil and Revenue Disputes
Land revenue matters under U.P. Land Revenue Act and U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act appeared repeatedly. In one, the Sub Divisional Officer manifestly erred by ignoring Rule 172 requirements, leading to remand: Matter remitted to Sub Divisional Officer concerned for drawing proceedings under section 189/194 of Act read with Rule 172 of Rules, 1952 afresh Gaon Sabha Thariya Distt. Hardoi Thru Village Pradhan VS State Of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Revenue Lucknow - 2019 Supreme(All) 648.
Another affirmed the Commissioner's post-amendment jurisdiction: The Commissioner has jurisdiction to decide revisions on merit under the U.P. Land Revenue Act post-amendment, without needing to refer to the Board of Revenue Lalsa Yadav vs Board of Revenue, Lucknow - 2025 Supreme(All) 2523.
Common Issues
- Lease and Consolidation Disputes: Entries over khasra plots contested; lower findings on intestate death upheld if unappealed Gaon Sabha Thariya Distt. Hardoi Thru Village Pradhan VS State Of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Revenue Lucknow - 2019 Supreme(All) 648.
- Restoration Timelines: Directed expeditious decision within three months Gaon Sabha Thariya Distt. Hardoi Thru Village Pradhan VS State Of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Revenue Lucknow - 2019 Supreme(All) 648.
Overlaps with Criminal and Civil Proceedings
A critical ruling addressed dual remedies: If an act gives rise to both criminal and civil proceedings, the criminal court cannot refuse to proceed with the criminal case on the ground that civil action may also lie MAHAMANDLESHWAR SWAMI VS STATE OF U P - 2005 Supreme(All) 739. Quashing a rejection under CrPC Section 156(3), the court mandated proceeding despite civil overlaps MAHAMANDLESHWAR SWAMI VS STATE OF U P - 2005 Supreme(All) 739.
Restoration Applications and Liberal Approaches
In tribunal matters, courts advocate leniency: The sufficiency of cause for delay in filing a restoration application should be judged with a liberal approach, considering the reasonableness in normal circumstances Ram Bilas Mahto VS Union of India - 2006 Supreme(All) 1787. Health issues like angina justified condoning delay under Railway Claims Tribunal Act Ram Bilas Mahto VS Union of India - 2006 Supreme(All) 1787.
Delay condonation extends to appeals: Delay if not inordinate, should be condoned keeping the circumstances of the case in mind MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM VS SENAPATI APPALANAIDU - 2012 Supreme(SC) 205.
Family and Maintenance Law
Interim maintenance under Hindu Marriage Act Section 24 was fixed at Rs.5,000/month, emphasizing sufficiency for reasonable comfort matching the wife's prior status Rita Lal VS Addl. Principal Judge - 2006 Supreme(Bom) 818.
Mentions of Rajarama Prasad Yadav and Associates
Judgments frequently reference R.P. Yadav as judge or counsel across cases—from dacoity Mangaroo son of Ram Sakal (In Jail) VS State of U. P. - 2005 Supreme(All) 1585, discharges Ramashray Yadav VS State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 2070, to revenue disputes Lalsa Yadav vs Board of Revenue, Lucknow - 2025 Supreme(All) 2523. Karnataka High Court records list Rajarama Prasad family in land appeals SMT.JAYAMMA SINCE DEAD BY LRS Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SRI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, often with advocates like Rajarama S. SRI S. ABDUL RAHIM Vs THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER. These suggest interconnected legal networks in ongoing proceedings.
Third-party procedures under Original Side Rules were interpreted broadly for indemnity claims L. Venkatakrishna Naidu, Receiver VS R. Narayanaswami Aiyar and five Ors. and T. S. Rajarama Sastri - 1938 Supreme(Mad) 278.
Key Takeaways from Rajarama Prasad Yadav Legal Proceedings
- Prima Facie Threshold: Low bar for rejecting discharges; focus on trial-worthiness Ramashray Yadav VS State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 2070.
- Evidence Quality: Reliable single witness trumps multiples; recent recovery key for presumptions RAJPAL VS STATE OF U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 447, Mangaroo son of Ram Sakal (In Jail) VS State of U. P. - 2005 Supreme(All) 1585.
- Procedural Rigidity: Mandatory deposits lead to dismissal; no civil excuse for criminal halt Sugan Chand Saini VS Senior Sub Judge And Anr. - 1996 Supreme(P&H) 594, MAHAMANDLESHWAR SWAMI VS STATE OF U P - 2005 Supreme(All) 739.
- Liberal Delays: Health, distance justify condonation in restorations Ram Bilas Mahto VS Union of India - 2006 Supreme(All) 1787.
- Revenue Jurisdiction: Commissioners decide merits post-amendment Lalsa Yadav vs Board of Revenue, Lucknow - 2025 Supreme(All) 2523.
These cases illustrate Indian courts' balance of efficiency, fairness, and procedure. Rajarama Prasad Yadav legal proceedings exemplify how names recur in diverse litigation, from crime to elections.
Disclaimer: This post summarizes public judicial records for informational purposes. Legal outcomes depend on facts; seek professional advice. Cases may evolve.
Search Results for "Rajarama Prasad Yadav: Key Legal Proceedings Explained"
2024 0 Supreme(All) 2070 • India - Allahabad
NAND PRABHA SHUKLA
needed to be established for proceeding with the trial. ... Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 245 and 246 - Writ petition challenging the rejection of discharge application in a criminal proceeding ... (Paras 9, 10) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The petitioner was summoned in a complaint case alleging ... The statement of the complainant as well as PW-2 R.P. ... Ramashray Yadav) and also allow the discharge application filed by petitioner by setting aside t....
2005 0 Supreme(All) 1585 • India - Allahabad
IMTIYAZ MURTAZA, R.P.YADAV
Fact of the Case: In the night of 7/8.2.2003, Rajesh Kumar Shukla, P.W. 1 (35 years), son of Shri Hridayanand Shukla ... The court examined the facts of a dacoity case in which several family members were injured and three died. ... P.W. 1 and Ranjana Shukla (P.W. 4) have one son namely, Rikki alias Ankit (13 years) P.W. 5. ... R. P. YADAV, J. ... Gulariha in presence of Panches including Prahalad Pandey, P. W. 14.....
1996 0 Supreme(P&H) 594 • India - Punjab and Haryana
ASHOK BHAN, R.L.ANAND
Respondent No. 2 filed a second election petition on the same cause of action. ... The Court found that Rule 79 of the Rules provides for the mandatory dismissal of an election petition in case of non-compliance ... Fact of the Case: Petitioner, an elected Municipal Councillor, challenged the order of the Tribunal allowing the withdrawal ... Shri R. P. ... Mittal, Advocate, on behalf of the petitioner and Shri R. P. ... Upon compliance with the conditions as to the se....
2011 0 Supreme(All) 243 • India - Allahabad
ARUN TANDON
6—Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988—Section 13(1)(d)—(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468 and 471—Ghaziabad P.F ... of involvement of accused-appellants and a case for they being summoned—At this stage it cannot be said that Special Judge has committed ... Fund—Investigation has been transferred to C.B.I. under orders of the Apex Court—Court may record that material does disclose a prima facie case ... discharge of judicial function by a Judicial Officer will not make him a party to ....
2019 0 Supreme(All) 648 • India - Allahabad
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
U.P. Land Revenue Act – Section 34 – U.P.Z.A. & L.R. ... Act – section 167, section 189/194 – U.P.Z.A & L.R. ... reason that said order was not challenged by respondent in appeal – Matter remitted to Sub Divisional Officer concerned for drawing proceedings ... of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. ... The proceedings under section 34 of U.P. ... or proceeding.
• India - High Court of Karnataka
RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD MAJOR S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA PRASAD 6. ... LALITHAMMA MAJOR, D/O RAJARAMA RAO, 16. ... T R ANANTHARAO MAJOR S/O RAJARAMA RAO 12. ... O R ANANTHARAM PRASAD MAJOR S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA PRASAD RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 8 ARE RESIDING AT HUTHURU HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK-563127 SMT LAKSHMAMMA MAJOR W/O LATE RAMACHANDRA PRASAD 4.
• India - High Court of Karnataka
, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Cyril Prasad Pais, learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 have appeared in person. ... …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJARAMA.S, ADVOCATE) AND ... …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI P.P.HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1, SRI CYRIL PRASAD PAIS, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4 HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Sri Rajarama.S
• India - High Court of Karnataka
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
SRI R SOMASUNDARA PRASAD S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 4. ... SRI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS 2. SRI T R VISHWANATH S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS 3. ... It is open for the appellants to contest the proceedings before the jurisdictional Land Tribunal. ... SRI T R ANANTHARAM PRASAD S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING....
1938 0 Supreme(Mad) 278 • India - Madras
VENKATARAMANA RAO
Possibly some delay may be caused by the third party proceedings, but the object of the rule is td enable the Court to try once for all an issue of fact in which all parties are alike interested. ... 11. ... If therefore Rajarama Sastri would, according to dictum of Jessel, M.R., in Swansea Shipping Co. v. ... So far as Rajarama Sastri is concerned, the sale deed dated 14th March, 1923, in favour of the 1st defendant contains the following covenant: ... The said vendor (Rajarama Sastri) doth hereby covenant with the said....
• India - High Court of Karnataka
Rajarama, Advocate) AND 1. Smt. ... SHYAM PRASAD & SMT. H.R. ... 1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE ... Ltd., Krishna Prasad Building, 3rd Floor, M.G. Road, Mangalore – 575 001. ...
2005 0 Supreme(All) 739 • India - Allahabad
R.P.YADAV
C. on the ground that civil proceedings may also lie was not correct and legal. ... refuse to proceed with the criminal case on the ground that civil action may also lie. ... refuse to proceed with the criminal case on the ground that civil action may also lie. ... R. P. YADAV, J. ... Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned A. G. A. ... for criminal proceedings and also for civil proceeding....
2025 0 Supreme(All) 2523 • India - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
(A) U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1953 - Sections 33, 39, and 9-A(2) - U.P. ... (Paras 11, 12) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The petitioner’s father was granted a lease ... R.P. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Tarun Gaur, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents. ... of the order passed and as to the regularity of proceedings, and, if it were of opinion that the proceeding taken or order passed ... There is no dispute about th....
2006 0 Supreme(All) 1787 • India - Allahabad
The matter was remanded to the tribunal for further proceedings. ... for adjudication on merits. ... Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Restoration Application - Sufficiency of CauseFact of the Case: The appellant's ... DHAON, R. P. YADAV, JJ. ... ( 1 ) HEARD Mr. ... He was resident of village Sihoma, P. S. ... The health of a person is first concern, he can fight a legal battle, if he is alive and not otherwise.
2019 0 Supreme(All) 447 • India - Allahabad
SUDHIR AGARWAL, RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Fact of the Case: The prosecution case involved an incident where the accused-appellants assaulted the victim resulting ... case, medical examinations, and the investigation. ... The investigation and medical examinations corroborated the prosecution's case. ... He was deputed on duty of inquest proceedings and he rushed at above Hospital where dead body was kept and inquest proceeding was ... , as has been propounded in Narvada Prasad versus Chagan ....
2006 0 Supreme(Bom) 818 • India - Bombay
U.K.DHAON, R.P.YADAV
The court awarded interim maintenance to the appellant under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, even during the pendency of proceedings ... Fact of the Case: The appellant, wife, sought to cancel an ex parte divorce decree obtained by the respondent, husband ... under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code as the same is not a proceeding under the Hindu Marriage Act. ... She is aggrieved by an order dated 24 - 1 - 2005 passed in Misc. proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure ... learned Additional Pri....
Filter by Legal Phrase
